Jump to content
Users will currently see a stripped down version of the site until an advertising issue is fixed. If you are seeing any suspect adverts please go to the bottom of the page and click on Themes and select IPS Default. ×
RMweb
 
  • entries
    109
  • comments
    1,198
  • views
    190,188

coombe junction - moorswater - highs and lows...


bcnPete

3,394 views

Update - This one is not very upbeat I am afraid - I was hoping to have cracked the cladding last night...and not my mojo :(

 

On the high point - after Scott's excellent descriptive piece about china clay dries and Moorswater, I thought I had better redo my homework. Out came the photos of Moorswater then and now and sure enough I had missed off the step in the building to allow the conveyor to pass from one to the other :angry:

 

I think this oversight was because there is a lot of 'kit' outside/attached to the buildings which I thought could be built later once the main building shells were built and clad but this one not so. So out with the scalpel and a few cuts later, a new end wall to the largest building and a modified side wall to the building, which is currently undergoing the cladding options. The conveyer has had to be reduced in length as my building is about two thirds of the prototype, so I tried to keep the angle of it the same so it doesn't look like a ski lift. This will be clad later and steel beams added beneath to recreate the support structure. I also managed to cut a small opening for a doorway which leads to the external structures by walkways.

 

blogentry-3290-074075600 1291209247_thumb.jpg

This is with the modification to include the conveyer...

 

Scott's note did also get me to requestion what I am trying to achieve here. I knew I could not represent Moorswater in full, and to model all the buildings to exact length would mean losing quite a few elements, but at least if I can recreate enough of it to 'give a sense of place' and that people could recognise it as Moorswater, albeit slightly condensed. So where possible, buildings have been built to scale height and width with only the length being cropped to suit.

 

Now the low point - taking on board as many comments as possible from before, I redid a cladding test using a thin strip of paper to create a minimal overhang and instead of using strips of horizontal cladding, I cut them into 6mm widths as Scott had noted they were 7 foot by 3 foot panels generally. This has proved more difficult than anticipated as to cut the panels between the troughs, butt them tightly together in the horizontal and try to align the ribs vertically...well let's just say the air was blue last night :blink: It didn't even make it to the morning to look at it with fresh eyes because it looked so awful. Not so much the overhang, which is more subtle, but the overall clustering of panels does not look convincing.

 

blogentry-3290-038239300 1291209236_thumb.jpg

Individual cladding panels on paper spacer...

 

So...cladding removed...blank canvas again...and time for a rethink. This morning I had a look at (one of many) of Chris Nevard's inspirational layouts, namely Cement Quay to see how the cladding has been handled in 4mm. It looks like a lot of the structures have overlaps to the cladding but not necessarily individual sheets but the painting and weathering and colouring all comes together to make a unified whole...and very pleasing it is, to look at.

 

Perhaps the individual panels are not the way forward for my building and I will have to either score them or rely on the painting and weathering. This last shot (copyright Mark 46444) does demonstrate how the horizontal banding is very prominent, whilst the lapping is only noticeable by the small fixings to the panels.

 

blogentry-3290-083162600 1291210113_thumb.jpg

 

Sorry that it's not such a great post, but as I treat my blog as a diary, I think it's important to show that not everything goes quite as planned - Back to the drawing board CAD machine for me :rolleyes:

32 Comments


Recommended Comments



Um Scott

 

Arent CDA and HAA hopper bodies aluminium? I dont think they rust.

 

Might be wrong though

 

Cheers

 

Jim

 

They are actually galvanised steel. CDA's are in a constant state of flux, getting sandblasted, repainted, covered in clay dust, rained on, covered again, rained on again, etc. and I have got many many photographs of rusty CDAs.

 

By the way Pete I didn't take your post as being arrogant at all. I fully understand that every modeller has his priorities when it comes to making compromises. My priorities are with the clay works themselves, as that's what my interest revolves around.

 

The OOV is indeed a mevagissey model. It's woefully inaccurate however.

 

Scott.

Link to comment
  • RMweb Gold

Scott - thanks - didn't know that about CDA's so more useful information - I think the OOV uses a Peco 5 plank for the base (as I used to) which means it's on a 10ft as opposed to a 9ft chassis...Parkwood do an interesting kit though...which features partly in my previous ramblings on here :)

Link to comment

yeah asa Scott says (so not written in invisible ink!!) CDAs are galvanised steel, just like the coal hoppers they once were - Scotts got the rusting bang on, though often you cant see the rust for the Clay.

Clay really does get everywhere, particularly in wet weather when it sticks. \one thing I have never seen so far on a model is jsut how much clay misses the hopper and ends up on the top of the frames and round the easy-sheet mechanism etc...

Link to comment
  • RMweb Gold

Thanks also Mickey

 

one thing I have never seen so far on a model is jsut how much clay misses the hopper and ends up on the top of the frames and round the easy-sheet mechanism etc...

 

This is where you come in with your CDA's... ;)

Link to comment

Indeed...though I must admit that at £12 a pop I hardly dare even touch 'em!! :lol:

 

I think I shall dig out some old Hornby OO ones to have a few practises on B)

Link to comment
  • RMweb Gold

I think I shall dig out some old Hornby OO ones to have a few practises on B)

 

That's good news too as I bought a 3 pack of those yesterday for my kids layout....no pressure then Mickey...2mm or 4mm...:lol:

Link to comment

I would personally hate to see what would happen to an aluminium bodied hopper once 10 tons of coal has been dropped from 20 feet down into it. I imagine that it would at least be a rather different shape afterwards!

 

Scott.

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...