more of a Barca.....Though the overlap on corrugated sheeting on models is something I can never quite weigh up....it looks wrong if there isn't any,,,,,but it also looks wrong if there is too much :/ ......this latest effort seems to have got it more or less right and I imagine that the painting will reduce the visual of the overlap impact rather a lot

The thing is you're actually trying to model a very small diference in thickness, 152 (or 148?) times smaller. I certainly think you've got the right approach with the 'butting' method. You do need to ensure the corrugations line up (I think they mostly do!) as the real sheets can only properly be laid that way.

Got some information for you that you might find useful. I have been studying and modelling the china clay industry in Cornwall for the past 6 years, so if you can think of anything you'd like to ask me, please go right ahead.

First of all, I noticed in one of your previous postings that you pointed out the tall cylindrical structure as being the rotary dryer. Actually, this structure is the fuel oil tank for the dryer, the rotary dryer itself is a mechanical plant sited within the building that you are currently cladding. It is an approximately 7 meter by 2 meter insulated tube, laid horizontally, and slightly inclined to one end, mounted on rollers. This tube rotates, hence the term "rotary", by a planetary rack and pinion gear, and accounts for just under half the length of the building, and about a third of the width. The other half is taken up by the filter press deck, where clay slurry is introduced under pressure into banks of filter cells. This produces a more easily handled "cake", which can be moved throughout the rest of the process on conveyor belts. The remaining space inside the building is taken up with machines like lump-breakers, pug mill extruders, pelletisers, paddle mixers, feed delivery conveyors, and inspection platforms. Your open sliding "door" at the end of the rotary dryer building, would be looking in on the steps up to the press deck, and their concrete supports.

Secondly, I noticed that you have provided the entire length of the building with an asymmetrical roof. On the prototype, this asymmetrical roof only extends half-way along the length of the building. At this halfway point, a covered conveyor structure emerges and rises to join the gable end of the large clay store. This feature is visible from photographs. The rotary dryer building at moorswater is 50 feet wide x 160 feet long, of which the first 90 feet has an asymmetrical roof. The asymmetrical section is about 6 feet wider than the symmetrical section, accounting for the 6 foot wide covered conveyor belt structure. This structure contains a single conveyor belt, and a walkway next to it.

Also, the individual corrugated sheets used on buildings built by ECLP, were generally 7 foot x 3 foot. Don't forget that corrugated clear plastic sheets were used on the roof to allow light to enter the building. These were laid in a distinctive alternating pattern. Toward the end of the dryer's life, a few of these got broken and were replaced, resulting in a pattern of different coloured sheets on the roof. The plastic became so brittle in the constant sunlight that eventually all it took to break one was to lift a ladder or pipe too high! Speaking of the roof, it appears that you have already noticed that there is a clerestory ridge vent on the rotary dryer building. There is also a similar vent on the store building.

Another feature, possibly yet to be included in your model, is the wet scrubbing exhaust stack unit. This stands atop a steel tower beside the rotary dryer buiding and the oil tank, and is visible in photographs of the site. This unit essentially consists of a vertical cylindrical tank with an exhaust stack emerging from it's top, and an exhaust steam pipe entering it's base. This feature was, I believe, added sometime around 1975, when dust pollution laws came into effect. Prior to that, there was just a vertical steam stack emerging from the roof of the rotary dryer building, about halfway down it's length, and just off-centre. Which of the two steam exhaust stacks are modelled would depend on your era, but either way the feature is essential to a modern dryer, as aside from water, steam and hot gasses are the main bi-product of mechanical clay drying. A steam exhaust stack is how a clay industry engineer can tell dryer buildings apart from store buildings without entering one.

The older dry has a cut-down granite chimney stack at the far end. This might be worth including on a painted backscene. The dry is approximately 50 feet wide, and in the region of 300 feet long. The settling tanks at the rear (the uphill side) of the dry, are about 70 feet by 60 feet. Among these settling tanks adjoining the back of the dry are some small buildings. These buildings were filter press houses, that were added to aid the dewatering process back when the coal fired dry was still in use. These buildings stand one storey above the settling tanks, and were 20 feet x 40 feet, with a gable roof. Access to these concrete block-built buildings was usually internal, so their only external feature should be some 5 foot square industrial 12 pane windows.

The modern rotary store is 115 foot wide, by 150 foot long, and is asymmetrical along it's entire length. The lower side covers the tracks. The ridge of the roof is 18 feet off centre. There are two catwalks either side of the ridge, the purpose of which is unknown.

To model all the buildings in N scale, in full length without the use of selective compression, would've required a board 60cm long, by 36cm wide, if you excluded the settling tanks on the coal fired dry. To model the entire length and width of the site, from boundary to boundary, would require a baseboard 1.6 meters long by 60 cm wide. Most of this would be taken up by settling tanks, access roads and the headshunt. As it stands I think your selective compression has worked very well, and the height of the buildings looks to be spot on to me.

Well anyway, I hope this wasn't too long to read, and that you got some useful information out of it. Like I said if there's anything else you want to know about the clay industry or Moorswater dryer, let me know.

Scott.

I think I'm with Kris on this one. The 'overlap' is a definite improvement in being quite subtle, but individual panels would be better - either as true separate panels or pre-scored on the strips...

BTW, thanks for the pointer on the Evergreen cladding - it looks like it could be exactly what I'm after, but could you let me know which version it is? What's the distance between the 'peaks' and 'troughs'?

Cheers

When I get around to it I'll produce some scale drawings. I've (partly) built an N scale model of a rotary dryer building, albeit a different prototype, so I could upload a few photographs to give you some ideas about the steam exhaust system.

The covered conveyor would be difficult for you to model at this stage, unless you made some serious modifications to the structure. If you would like to be as prototypical as possible, and want to include this feature, then my suggestion would be to hold fire on the cladding for now, and wait for me to send you some diagrams, as it's easier to show than tell.

Pete sorry i was not able to get on line till now . did you think of sanding a chamfer to the bottom of the sheets on the inside this would allow you to get them closer and reduce the overhang

nige

I don't know if its been mentioned so far but if you get really stuck you could always try copper or aluminium corrugated foil - as sold by Micromark, amongst others......