Ruston Posted September 27, 2017 Share Posted September 27, 2017 (edited) Having recently cleared two skips worth of junk out of the garage the way is now clear for planning another layout. This time I have 11ft. 6ins. to play with for the scenic section, plus fiddle yard/off-scene. I've currently got two ideas for the grand design... The first is a multi-industry layout; a sort Trafford Park Estate meets the Silvertown Tramway thing. Starting at the far left is a scrapyard with roadside running and a level crossing to an oil/fuel depot. Below the "main line" is a depot for the estate company locomotives and to the right is a large warehouse or engineering works with the fiddle yard off stage, right.. The period would be 1950s/1960s, allowing BR rolling stock and company steam and diesel industrial locomotives. The second is a bit different from my usual period of modelling and is an enlarged version of one of the ideas I had for a small/Cameo layout. The region is a bit vague but possibly somewhere around Elland/Halifax and the mine produces coal and fireclay. The upper right track comes in from the fiddle yard on an upward gradient and trains are run around and run up the lower line, which climbs to a headshunt, where they reverse on the climb to the mine. It's all countrified and will give a good long run of around 26ft. from entry onto scenic section to arrival at the mine. There could even be another switchback just before the mine that goes off-scene on the assumption of another mine being served. The period will be about 1920 so the mine is small, with wooden headstocks and the motive power is all small 0-4-0 saddletanks (Pecketts, Manning Wardles, Black Hawthorns) I cannot make my mind up which to go for. The first one allows a lot of my existing stock to be used and, being a later period, allows diesels, period motor cars and lorries etc. All of which I like. The second one rules out all of the above but I like the idea of something less urban-industrial and the idea of dumb-buffered contractors type wagons and small old wheezing saddletanks charging up steep gradients with just 3 or 4 wagons. Decisions decisions... Edited September 27, 2017 by Ruston 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chriscleveland Posted September 27, 2017 Share Posted September 27, 2017 (edited) Will this be oo or o gauge? Edited September 27, 2017 by chriscleveland Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold Corbs Posted September 27, 2017 RMweb Gold Share Posted September 27, 2017 I rather like the split level one, if your wagons are heavily weighted it may be a good challenge to get the locos blasting up the bank! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold Regularity Posted September 28, 2017 RMweb Gold Share Posted September 28, 2017 Build one, on top of storage space, and when you get bored with it, put it in the storage space, and build the other. Swap ad infinitum. This changes your dilemma from, "Which do I build?" to, "Which do I build first?" 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
5050 Posted September 28, 2017 Share Posted September 28, 2017 There's 2 sides to your garage Dave. Build both! I like them both but the second one does seem to have more scenic and operating potential - and could be run in both periods without much difficulty. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold Stubby47 Posted September 28, 2017 RMweb Gold Share Posted September 28, 2017 I rather like the split level one, if your wagons are heavily weighted it may be a good challenge to get the locos blasting up the bank! ... the second one does seem to have more scenic and operating potential - and could be run in both periods without much difficulty. I agree with both of these posts - the 2nd one has much more 'fun' factor. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ruston Posted September 28, 2017 Author Share Posted September 28, 2017 Will this be oo or o gauge? It will be OO Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold Corbs Posted October 4, 2017 RMweb Gold Share Posted October 4, 2017 Dave, here's a curveball (easily ignored). Have you thought about a different kind of layout, rather than a supplier or source (as you have done with the output sidings at Nant Y Mynydd, River Don and White Peak), you could model a way of tying all three layouts together so they can be operated as one whole? Like a set of exchange sidings? Where trains arrive and get broken up to distribute to each of the locations, or maybe coal gets taken from Nant to River Don, then steel carried away from River Don, etc.? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ruston Posted October 6, 2017 Author Share Posted October 6, 2017 (edited) Dave, here's a curveball (easily ignored). Have you thought about a different kind of layout, rather than a supplier or source (as you have done with the output sidings at Nant Y Mynydd, River Don and White Peak), you could model a way of tying all three layouts together so they can be operated as one whole? Like a set of exchange sidings? Where trains arrive and get broken up to distribute to each of the locations, or maybe coal gets taken from Nant to River Don, then steel carried away from River Don, etc.? Thanks for the idea butI can't see how that can work to be honest. They were only ever designed to be self-contained railways and all three are dead end track layouts with each baseboard being of a different depth. With two of them having the hidden sidings at the same end it would be very difficult to link them all together to be able to run as one. The main thing agaist this idea is that I want to build something completely new for this project. Edited October 6, 2017 by Ruston Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LBRJ Posted October 6, 2017 Share Posted October 6, 2017 Big vote for the second one here - I like the Rural Industry aspect of it a lot; and the plan looks different to the norm but workable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barclay Posted October 7, 2017 Share Posted October 7, 2017 I think I'll have to go against the flow and vote for the industrial estate. Wild Swan's book on the Slough Estates railway is full of evocative pictures. 20's and 30's architecture, pipe gantries running over the road, loco's squeezing between parked cars. Almost enough to make me start again! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now