bill badger Posted January 25, 2018 Share Posted January 25, 2018 Google has not been helpful so far on this: where would the guard / crew accommodation be in WCML Mk3 rakes prior to the DVTs coming along? For the Mk2 WCML / cross country rakes the obvious answer would be a BSO (and I understand these were used in the earlier days of Mk3 rakes) I have many internet sourced pictures showing exclusively Mk3 rakes with a BG at the end but no sign of a Mk2 vehicle or other obvious 'train crew' accommodation. There weren't enough Mk3 BFOs to go round, so what did the guard do when not walking the aisles? Was the BG manned for the duration of the trip? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold rodent279 Posted January 25, 2018 RMweb Gold Share Posted January 25, 2018 Yes, usually they ran with either a mk1 BG, or a mk2 BSO, in which the guard lived when he/she was not doing ticket inspections etc. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pete the Elaner Posted January 25, 2018 Share Posted January 25, 2018 Weren't the Mk3 BFO's all Mk3B's, therefore built around the same time as the DVT's? Mk1 BGs were usually used. I seem to remember reading that the 110mph services used specially maintained BGs coded NHA. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
woodenhead Posted January 25, 2018 Share Posted January 25, 2018 I only ever remember BGs with the Mk3 trains until the DVTs came along Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flood Posted January 26, 2018 Share Posted January 26, 2018 (edited) The three Mk3B BFO coaches are covered in this post: http://www.rmweb.co.uk/community/index.php?/topic/2556-coaching-stock-the-clansman-1986/?p=18989 Looking at the 1985 Passenger Train Marshalling Circular the Mk3 rakes have just an NEA (or 110 mph NHA) for the Liverpool and Glasgow trains. The Manchester trains have an approximate 50/50 split of either a BSO at one end and an NEA at the other or just a single NEA. There is the odd exception but these seem to be the general rule.. Edited January 29, 2018 by Flood Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium Legend Posted January 26, 2018 RMweb Premium Share Posted January 26, 2018 Yes I used to see many a Euston Train leave from Glasgow Central. On mk3 formations the guard was in BG until DVTs appeared Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bill badger Posted January 26, 2018 Author Share Posted January 26, 2018 Thanks all. BGs / NEAs it is then; I think for some reason I had it in my head that BGs & NEAs weren't gangwayed (so what did the G stand for then!). Still nice to have the confirmation. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
muddy water Posted January 26, 2018 Share Posted January 26, 2018 BG braked gangway. You must be thinking of GUVs General utility Van. These had end doors for loading only. Usual cars, on the motor rail trains. These were used on the WCML attached to passenger trains. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Johnfromoz Posted January 28, 2018 Share Posted January 28, 2018 Very interested in any pictures or recollections of Mk 3 WCML stock working with MK 2 e/f stock. I know it would only be occasional as the BGs were the conventional option. Seem to recall possibly some Holyhead services mixing mk2/3. Anyone recall such mixtures? TIA Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GordonC Posted January 28, 2018 Share Posted January 28, 2018 there was always some sets with mk2 air conditioned coaches for the bulk of the rake but a mk3 buffet coach ... was it an RFM? also earlier days, perhaps early 80s, had very mixed rakes Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mjkerr Posted January 28, 2018 Share Posted January 28, 2018 (edited) WCML rakes 1986 / 1987 were basically in these types of formations : WB 300 WB 302 Manchester Pullman Mk 2d BSO, 3x Mk 3a TSO, Mk 3 RFB, 3x Mk 3b FO, RKB / Optional Mk 3b FO / Optional NEX WB 303 WB 304 Merseyside Pullman 4x Mk 3a TSO, Mk 3a RFB, 3x Mk 3b FO, RBR, NEA WB328 Lancashire Pullman Mk 2d BSO, 5x Mk 2d TSO, RKB, 3x Mk 3b FO, NEA WB 305 Mk 2d SO, 7x Mk 3a TSO, Mk 3a RSM, Mk 3a FO, Mk 3b FO , NEA WB 306 WB 307 Mk 2d BSO, 5x Mk 2d SO, 2x Mk 2d TSO, RBR, Mk 3a FO, Mk 3b FO, NEA WB 308 WB 309 Mk 2d BSO, 5x Mk 2d TSO, Mk 3a RFB, 3x Mk 3a FO, NEA WB 310 WB 311 Mk 2d SO, Mk 2d TSO, 5x Mk 3a TSO, Mk 3a RFB, 2x Mk 3b FO, NEA WB 320 Clansman (Euston - Glasgow) 3x Mk 3a TSO, Mk 3a RFB, Mk 3a FO, Mk 3b BFO WB 321 WB 324 Clansman (Euston - Inverness) NHA, Mk 3a FO, 5x Mk 3a TSO WB 322 WB 323 WB 326 6x Mk 3a TSO, Mk 3a RFB, 2x Mk 3a FO, NHA WB 327 6x Mk 3a TSO, RBR, 2x Mk 3a FO, NHA OY 260 4x Mk 2d TSO, RBR, 4x Mk 2d FO, NEA OY 261 OY 262 OY 263 Mk 2d BSO, 5x Mk 2d TSO, RBR, 4x Mk 2d, NEA OY 264 OY 265 OY 266 Mk 2d SO, 5x Mk 2d TSO, RBR, 3x Mk 2d FO, NEA OY 267 Mk 2c SO, 5x Mk 2d TSO, RBR, 4x Mk 2d FO, NEA OY 268 Mk 2d BSO, 4x Mk 2d TSO, RBR, 4x Mk 2d FO, 2 x NEA OY 271 OY 273 Mk 2d BSO, 4x Mk 2d TSO OY 270 OY 272 RBR, 3x Mk 2d FO, NEA OY 274 Mk 2d BSO, 5x Mk 2d TSO, RBR, 4x Mk 2d FO, NEA OY 275 OY 276 Midlands - Scotland sets LL 300 4 Mk 2d TSO, 3x Mk 3a TSO, Mk 3a RFB, 3 x Mk 3a FO, NEA LL 301 Mk 2d BSO, 7x Mk 2d SO, RBR, 2x Mk 3a FO, NEA MA 300 Manchester Pullman Mk 2d TSO, 3x Mk 3a TSO, Mk 3a RFB, 3x Mk 3b FO, RKB, Mk 3b FO (brake van?) MA 301 2x Mk 2d TSO, 6x Mk 3a TSO, RBR, 2x Mk 2d FO, NEA MA 302 Mk 2d TSO , 5x Mk 3a TSO, Mk 3a RSM, 2x Mk 3a FO, NEA MA 260 MA 261 MA 262 MA 263 MA 264 MA 265 Mk 2d BSO, 5x Mk 2d TSO, RBR, 2x Mk 2d FO, NEA CL 300 CL 301 Mk 2d BSO, Mk 2d SO, 4x Mk 2d TSO, 3x Mk 3a TSO, RBR, 2x Mk 3a FO, NEA CL 320 CL 321 CL 322 6x Mk 3a TSO, Mk 3a RFB, 2x Mk 3a FO, NHA Edited January 28, 2018 by mjkerr Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bomag Posted January 29, 2018 Share Posted January 29, 2018 I assume the reference to Mk2d include all d,e and f variants given that they add up to more Mk2d coaches than were built. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mjkerr Posted January 29, 2018 Share Posted January 29, 2018 I assume the reference to Mk2d include all d,e and f variants given that they add up to more Mk2d coaches than were built.Agreed, the article only lists Mark 2D coaches in formations However, there is a breakdown of all coaches by depot, which includes 2D 2E 2F Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold rodent279 Posted January 29, 2018 RMweb Gold Share Posted January 29, 2018 (edited) The Stranraer-Euston boat train, notorious for running late (an hour down was near enough right time!), usually had 1 or 2 GUV's on the rear, with cars in. Can't remember the full formation, but I think it was mainly Mk2 PV's. Edited January 29, 2018 by rodent279 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Johnfromoz Posted January 29, 2018 Share Posted January 29, 2018 Agreed, the article only lists Mark 2D coaches in formationsHowever, there is a breakdown of all coaches by depot, which includes 2D 2E 2F Thanks for the formation info. I was surprised to see any reference to Mk 2d on WCML - had they been cascaded from the ECML by this time? I always associated them with the Eastern and a few on the western. John Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pete the Elaner Posted January 29, 2018 Share Posted January 29, 2018 there was always some sets with mk2 air conditioned coaches for the bulk of the rake but a mk3 buffet coach ... was it an RFM? also earlier days, perhaps early 80s, had very mixed rakes I have seen photos of very mixed rakes & a friend tells me he liked the way the odd mix of lengths snaked through the station throat at Euston. I believe it would have been the 110mph services which separated them because the Mk2s were only maintained for 100mph. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flood Posted January 29, 2018 Share Posted January 29, 2018 (edited) Thanks for the formation info. I was surprised to see any reference to Mk 2d on WCML - had they been cascaded from the ECML by this time? I always associated them with the Eastern and a few on the western. John As stated above the use of Mk2D was more of a generic term in the PTMCs. In fact the copy I referred to actually stated AC2D, AE2D etc as POIS had just started to be used. By 1987 the majority of the Mk2D TSOs and BSOs were at Norwich. The FOs were spread around Anglia, Charter rakes and West Coast. The FKs and BFKs were spread around Anglia, Cross Country and West Coast. Edited January 29, 2018 by Flood Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mjkerr Posted January 29, 2018 Share Posted January 29, 2018 The Stranraer-Euston boat train, notorious for running late (an hour down was near enough right time!), usually had 1 or 2 GUV's on the rear, with cars in. Can't remember the full formation, but I think it was mainly Mk2 PV's.The topic discussed Mark 3 coaches, but I have not included the Mark 3 sleepers (as the rakes are quite complicated) However there is no record of this having GUV during the intercity period, suggesting this was prior to 1984 EN 260 EN 261 EN 262 6x Mk 2d TSO, RBR, Mk 2d FO, NEA Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mjkerr Posted January 29, 2018 Share Posted January 29, 2018 I have seen photos of very mixed rakes & a friend tells me he liked the way the odd mix of lengths snaked through the station throat at Euston. I believe it would have been the 110mph services which separated them because the Mk2s were only maintained for 100mph. Mixed rakes were more common in the early 1980s, as very few services were operated at 110mph Where a service was operating at 110mph it required the entire rake be Mark 3 coaches with a NHA (rated at 110mph) Sadly for maintenance the buffet would quite often be a Mark 1, so this limited the set to 100mph This was quite common at the early stage of the Mark 3 RFM conversions Equally, for a few days someone forgot one the Glasgow - Euston rakes had a Mark 2C TSO instead of a Mark 3A TSO It had been attached to remove one the Mark 3 coaches but the buckeye on the Mark 3 coach refused to release Time ran out and rather than have just four Mark 3A TSO, it was sent out and was supposed to return that night, but at Euston the diagrams swapped before it was realised the set had a note to return to Polmadie that night Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold rodent279 Posted January 29, 2018 RMweb Gold Share Posted January 29, 2018 The topic discussed Mark 3 coaches, but I have not included the Mark 3 sleepers (as the rakes are quite complicated) However there is no record of this having GUV during the intercity period, suggesting this was prior to 1984 EN 260 EN 261 EN 262 6x Mk 2d TSO, RBR, Mk 2d FO, NEA The Strannie, if I recall correctly, was not a full sleeper train, though it may have carried one or two sleepers. It definitely had GUV's on up to about 1986 though. I think a couple may have appeared in IC livery towards the end. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold rodent279 Posted January 29, 2018 RMweb Gold Share Posted January 29, 2018 Mixed rakes were more common in the early 1980s, as very few services were operated at 110mph Where a service was operating at 110mph it required the entire rake be Mark 3 coaches with a NHA (rated at 110mph) Sadly for maintenance the buffet would quite often be a Mark 1, so this limited the set to 100mph This was quite common at the early stage of the Mark 3 RFM conversions Equally, for a few days someone forgot one the Glasgow - Euston rakes had a Mark 2C TSO instead of a Mark 3A TSO It had been attached to remove one the Mark 3 coaches but the buckeye on the Mark 3 coach refused to release Time ran out and rather than have just four Mark 3A TSO, it was sent out and was supposed to return that night, but at Euston the diagrams swapped before it was realised the set had a note to return to Polmadie that night I don't think 110mph running started until the May 1984 timetable. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mjkerr Posted January 29, 2018 Share Posted January 29, 2018 The Strannie, if I recall correctly, was not a full sleeper train, though it may have carried one or two sleepers. It definitely had GUV's on up to about 1986 though. I think a couple may have appeared in IC livery towards the end.Yes, but as above I have not included the sleeper services (due to their complexity) Also, the article is for the 1986 allocations Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mjkerr Posted January 29, 2018 Share Posted January 29, 2018 (edited) I don't think 110mph running started until the May 1984 timetable.Sounds about right, for the first full timetable, but was very limited to begin with This followed the abandoning of the APT and introduction of Mark 3A coaches From memory the first year (which would then be May 1983) used three Class 87 and three rakes of Mark 3A coaches, although they were still timed to 100mph In the first timetable these services were easy to identify as they did not stop between Preston - Euston, and typically arrived 15 minutes early There were union issues to be resolved, and during this period these were addressed Similar to HST, unions wanted a driver and second man, as the train speed was in excess of 100mph There were also maintenance concerns with such sets requiring more visits to depots and in turn pressure on staff to meet these Edited January 29, 2018 by mjkerr Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
EddieK Posted February 6, 2018 Share Posted February 6, 2018 Back in Summer 1989 I started work at Wembley Carriage Depot. At that time, the new DVTs were still being built, so the NHAs were typical Guard/luggage accommodation. As I recall, there was a set dedicated to Blackpool services and for some reason this had the BG at the north end not the normal position at the Euston end. Earlier that year, set WB08 had suffered a derailment and the five normal TSOs were damaged. The sixth TSO, next to the Buffet was the wheelchair TSO with wheelchair space and a larger toilet. This set had the damaged vehicles replaced by facelifted Mark 1 late-build TSOs. Because it was an "odd" set it was on a special diagram that returned it to Wembley every night. So this set had BG - 2 Mark 3a FO - Mark 3 RF - Mark 3 TSO(W) and 5 Mark 1 TSO. At that time, WB06 - WB18 were "normal" Mark 3 sets (though see above for WB08) with BG - 2x Mark 3a FO - Mark 3 RF - 6x Mark 3 TSO. The "Pullman" sets were WB60-something with BG - 3x Mark 3b Pullman FO - Mark 3 RF - 5x Mark 3a TSO. The "Super Pullman" sets (might have been MA based) had a second RF and IIRC the Mark 3b BFOs and obviously a shorter second class section. WB05 was the special set with BG - 3x Mark 3a FO - RF - 6x Mark 3a TSO so it could cover for a normal set or a Pullman set. Once I allocated it to a particular diagram (possibly after push pull introduction) that had motorail vans attached as well. Because this was one coach longer than any other set, the back of the train stuck out into the station throat at Euston and gave them a headache. WB04 set did not exist. WB01-03 sets were like the "normal" sets above but with Mark 2f TSOs vice Mark 3a. When the Edinburgh-Glasgow service was about to convert from Mark 3 + DBSO to Class 158s in 1990 (ish), Wembley had to loan some coaches to ScotRail so as to allow the Scottish based Mark 3s to go through works and be upgraded to the current InterCity refurbishment. When the ScotRail coaches had all been through works, the end result was that WB01-03 lost the Mark 2f TSOs in favour of Mark 3a while WB04 set was newly formed, of Mark 3a and probably with a DVT by then. The ScotRail fleet had included 6x Mark 3a FO, later downgraded to Composite Opens. Of these, two became FOs again in new set WB04, while the other four were converted to TSOs with wheelchair accommodation, with new TSO numbers 12169 - 12172, to give the wheelchair accommodation in WB01-04. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Johnfromoz Posted February 6, 2018 Share Posted February 6, 2018 Very interesting - Thanks Would it be correct to presume the Mk1 TSOs would have been in intercity (raspberry ripple) livery? John Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now