RMweb Gold Right Away Posted July 14, 2019 RMweb Gold Share Posted July 14, 2019 (edited) Never having visited Weymouth in the days of steam hauled boat trains, I cannot help but wonder if there were operational difficulties over the extremely sharp curve on the Tramway (other than inconsiderate parking). By necessity, speeds were extremely low; flange drag would be quite severe and the exposed location in bad weather must have made rail conditions challenging. Would any member know the chainage of the curve, loadings involved and would assistance have been provided where necessary on the heavier workings? Edited July 14, 2019 by Right Away 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
IWCR Posted July 15, 2019 Share Posted July 15, 2019 Was the Ivatt 2 normally used on this line?. I know the photo shows a well known event with one used in conjunction with a railtour but I would have thought the wheelbase was a bit long. Was this the only occasion? Pete Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Miss Prism Posted July 15, 2019 Share Posted July 15, 2019 From a map, radius looks to be approx 3.75 chains. The Ivatt's 13'9" wheelbase probably could cope at low speed. The ex-Bristol and Exeter engines working the tramway had 12'6" wheelbases. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold melmoth Posted July 15, 2019 RMweb Gold Share Posted July 15, 2019 What you could probably do with is a copy of Gerry Beale's excellent book "The Weymouth Harbour Tramway in the Steam Era" (Wild Swan, isbn 1874103674). Simon Castens at the Titfield Thunderbolt (and of Wild Swan Books) might still have copies, although I understand it is almost out of print. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
PenrithBeacon Posted July 15, 2019 Share Posted July 15, 2019 https://britishrailwaybooks.co.uk/books/ISBN/1874103674.php https://www.amazon.co.uk/Weymouth-Harbour-Tramway-Gerry-Beale/dp/1874103674/ref=sr_1_2?hvadid=80126942023750&hvbmt=bp&hvdev=c&hvqmt=p&keywords=weymouth+harbour+tramway&qid=1563183091&s=books&sr=1-2 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold phil_sutters Posted July 15, 2019 RMweb Gold Share Posted July 15, 2019 Don't forget that there is a previous forum at 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold Right Away Posted July 16, 2019 Author RMweb Gold Share Posted July 16, 2019 Thank you everyone. Hadn't realised much had been discussed previously. Much appreciated. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
eastglosmog Posted July 16, 2019 Share Posted July 16, 2019 If not to late, I have just consulted my copy of The Weymouth Harbour Tramway by John Lucking and can give you a few figures: 1889-1938 minimum radius (Ferry Curve) 3ch 21ft (223ft). after 1938 works, the minimum radius about 6chains (396ft) After 1938, longest coach permitted was 64ft 6in if 9ft 3in wide and 66ft 8in if 8ft 11in wide 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold Right Away Posted July 17, 2019 Author RMweb Gold Share Posted July 17, 2019 On 16/07/2019 at 07:39, eastglosmog said: If not too late, I have just consulted my copy of The Weymouth Harbour Tramway by John Lucking and can give you a few figures: 1889-1938 minimum radius (Ferry Curve) 3ch 21ft (223ft). after 1938 works, the minimum radius about 6chains (396ft) After 1938, longest coach permitted was 64ft 6in if 9ft 3in wide and 66ft 8in if 8ft 11in wide Thanks for this interesting information. So, after 1938 for this very tight curve in 4mm/ft scale, we're talking of a radius a smidge over 5' 2" ; a comparison that might give some of us pause for thought over our faster model curves? 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold john new Posted July 17, 2019 RMweb Gold Share Posted July 17, 2019 The tight curve in question (Ferry's Corner) required special couplings. It was later relieved by the current alignment. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
eastglosmog Posted July 18, 2019 Share Posted July 18, 2019 (edited) 22 hours ago, john new said: The tight curve in question (Ferry's Corner) required special couplings. It was later relieved by the current alignment. Indeed, the time and effort required to change them all on inbound and outbound trains was one of the reasons for spending the money on the works in 1938. Edited to add: Before the 1938 improvements, the corridor connections also had to be disconnected and the gangway doors locked before traversing the branch, adding further to the delay. Edited July 18, 2019 by eastglosmog Remembered a bit more interesting detail Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
37114 Posted March 2, 2020 Share Posted March 2, 2020 Removal started today of the Tramway track apparently, starting at the Ferry station. I feel a letter coming on to James May, a nice relay in 00 gauge andhappy to lend my class 33 and some Mk 1s for a final train to the quay to give it a send off. 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now