Jump to content
 

FOA flask wagon


bazjones1711
 Share

Recommended Posts

Having acquired a Cambrian BAA kit for the sum of £5 .00 rather than add it to my rakes of Bachmann  BAA  , my thoughts have turned to converting  it to one of the FOA  Flask wagons that ran from Winfrith to Sellafield, numbered  900115 this is the easier of the wagons to do as it retained its original bogies,  will need to replace the floor , build a flask , modify the end uprights , no time limit yet on this one though ! 

Covered Wagon.

 

This is in its original livery , found a few pics of it in train formations,  yet cannot find any pics of the wagon itself  it in its red livery , any information or pics of this wagon would be appreciated   ( to see if the chain down lugs have been removed etc... ) 

Regards baz 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Quote

 

 Baz.

.

I saw this wagon at Clapham Junction circa Feb. 1987 or 1988, being shunted by the light blue liveried and named ED.

.

I believed at that time (but couldn't confrim) it was in Winfrith traffic.

.

I promised a copy of my photo to Paul, but can't find it at the moment.

.

Brian R

Edited by br2975
Link to post
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, nightstar.train said:

What were these wagons used for? Obviously they don’t look anywhere near as strong as the FNA flask wagons, so presumably they’re not carrying as high level waste?

They are converted from BAAs, 100ton GLW wagons - just as strong as a BBA but only 40ft over headstocks. Very strong and many still running around loaded with steel products (they are c40 years old now). FNA on the other hand are only 80t GLW.

 

Paul

Edited by hmrspaul
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium
1 hour ago, nightstar.train said:

What were these wagons used for? Obviously they don’t look anywhere near as strong as the FNA flask wagons, so presumably they’re not carrying as high level waste?

 

Winfrith wasn't a power station - but was a research centre site for reactor designs and did have a few small reactors on the site.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Diagram is available in the Barrowmore MRG downloads (320part2)  http://www.barrowmoremrg.co.uk/Prototype.html

 

Obviously the shape of the cover is wrong, interestingly the cover appears to be asymetric along the length of the wagon- a quick guesstimate from the photo suggested that the cover was a shade longer than the 'inner' wheelbase, so of the order of 21ft or 84mm in 4mm/ft

image.png.01ad7bcb0493b9c80a691bf1ee8dce33.png

Link to post
Share on other sites

Winfrith was, I understand, the test centre for checking nuclear flasks, so it took a great deal of varieties of flask, which was one of the appeals for me of building Hamworthy which is only just up the rails - I can justify almost every type of flask wagon if I feel inclined!

 

Jon

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium
11 hours ago, hmrspaul said:

They are converted from BAAs, 100ton GLW wagons - just as strong as a BBA but only 40ft over headstocks. Very strong and many still running around loaded with steel products (they are c40 years old now). FNA on the other hand are only 80t GLW.

 

Paul

 

By strong I really meant crashworthy. The FNAs carry the flask down in between the sides, and the sides are large and very square looking. Whereas this is a hood on top of a wagon. So any flask under the hood can’t be as secure as in an FNA, was my thinking. Thus it carrying lower hazard waste than an FNA. 

  • Agree 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...

Coming to this a few years late...

The Winfrith site hosted a number of reactors, one of which provided power to the National Grid. The last reactor was shut down in 1995 (the one supplying power was shut down in 1990) and the site is due to be fully decommissioned in the next year or so. The large reactor used 'slightly' enriched Uranium fuel which I suspect is a lot like the fuel used in RN subs. I also think the fuel was carried in a similar style flask - cylindrical with a set of cooling vanes at one end, which would explain the asymmetric flask hood - just a cover if the load rating is anything to go by - as the centre of the load isn't in the middle of the wagon (if you see what I mean). The flask was really substantial and was expected to survive a collision on its own without needing the wagon to protect it - hence the need for a 100GLW wagon to move it.

HTH,

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...