Jump to content
RMweb
 

Imaginary Locomotives


Recommended Posts

Not necessarily imaginary in the truest sense of the word. Another modeller on here is making an BR Blue 9F. Oddly enough I was thinking up a layout along a similar theme and I have mocked up a possible 8F which I hope to be building sometime soon. 

 

attachicon.gif8f blue trail.png

 

attachicon.gif8f blue trail 2.png

 

I've added some "mod-cons" such as westy-house pumps and air tanks, headlights, a giesl ejector, mini-snowploughs, modified cab and tender to be enclosed and roller bearings etc etc.

 

I've done two post TOP liveries inc a mid 80's full yellow cab which I prefer tbh.

 

Now this I'm looking forward to seeing!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium

There are sme pretty hapless looking beasts there. Though I don't mind the WD's they're quite nice and the Q1 Austerity engine :P

 

I just finish painting up a modified "Black" 5 to go with the 8F. Unfortunately the corporate sectors of the 70's weren't a sentimental bunch but by the mid eighties some opinions had changed.

 

post-8963-0-31950400-1409145168.png

 

post-8963-0-22442100-1409310884.png

 

post-8963-0-93166500-1409310891.png

 

All modified locos would carry mechanical stokers, even the tank engines (with that mechanical pusher the austerities had) and GPCS. Some locos where even treated to Kylpor and Lempor ejectors. :) But the ones here's have Giels attached until further notice.

 

Edited by Sylvian Tennant
  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm interested in painting a Class 67 in Swallow livery with parts suitable for late Sectorisation and working a WCML-style push-pull set.  Whether or not this will come into fruition is another matter, especially as I want to model a real-life location.

 

I like some of the fictitious works here.

Edited by GarrettTheThief
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

...That 'Marchioness' looks like a real beast too.

Works better with 6' diameter drivers, allows that little bit more essential space to have the inside cylinders drive on the second coupled axle. It is a pity that the 2-8-2 format didn't get more of a trial in the UK, considering the success of the type in North America, France and Germany. Had the LMS built some, then we might have seen a 6' wheel BR standard 2-8-2 instead of both the Brit and 9F.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

One planned GWR engine I suspect might be become a good looking model was Churchward's plan for a 0-8-0 pannier tank (1905?) for heavy shunting. Basically it reused the parts from the 45xx parries, i.e. same wheels, cylinders and number 5 boiler. So if you cut up a Bachmann model...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi All,

 

I would like to add that a GWR 0-8-0 (albeit a tender loco) with outside cylinders HAS steamed in preservation.

 

 

 

 

Ok, it didn't go anywhere but it did exist.

 

 

 

 

In steam...

 

 

 

 

For about 24hrs...

 

 

 

 

 

A few years back we had the pony truck out of No. 3822 and it was time for its annual hot boiler test so it was steamed like that!

 

 

 

 

It counts!

 

 

 

 

Coat on and seeking door...

 

All the best,

 

Castle

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"i.e. same ... cylinders "

 

So an outside cylindered 0-8-0PT?  Nice thought :-)    David

Errrr...what can I say, you got me thinking!

 

post-20657-0-45901100-1409215575_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The GWR 0-8-0T looks good, very good in fact...

 

Same point, which is going make me sound like a bottom, the boiler on it should be a taper boiler with safety valves in the middle not the straight top with the dome.

 

 

Errr...what can I say, you got me thinking!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The GWR 0-8-0T looks good, very good in fact...

 

Same point, which is going make me sound like a bottom, the boiler on it should be a taper boiler with safety valves in the middle not the straight top with the dome.

Thank you!

 

By default, the program I use to make those design would usually self position, and install Safety Valves rather than a dome, but due to the boiler and wheel base, it thought I wanted a Dome! 

 

I'll give it another go!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unfortunately, the software I use won't allow me to modify an existing design, I had to start from scratch! So things are a little different!
Still, a predicted tractive effort of 36649 lbs...

post-20657-0-67976000-1409240291_thumb.jpg

For comparison, the old one:

post-20657-0-28406500-1409240408_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...