RMweb Premium Peter Beckett Posted June 3, 2011 RMweb Premium Share Posted June 3, 2011 Has any DURM member got a better group logo? I posted the original logo but as you can see, its too small and rectangular which has caused it appear squashed. Any donations to peter at gmail dot com Peter :rolleyes: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
DougN Posted June 8, 2011 Share Posted June 8, 2011 Peter, I thought it was quite good. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stuart-AU Posted July 10, 2011 Share Posted July 10, 2011 HI.. Still looks good from the day I made it and added it as my Sig.. It does look a bit squashed but it need to fit a size from the old forum. If you feel the need to change it by all means. Stuart in OZ Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium kevinlms Posted July 17, 2011 RMweb Premium Share Posted July 17, 2011 Has any DURM member got a better group logo? I posted the original logo but as you can see, its too small and rectangular which has caused it appear squashed. Any donations to peter at gmail dot com Peter :rolleyes: So how exactly do I add this to my profile? I've played around with various settings to no avail. I managed to make it my photo, but removed as soon as I realised. Kevin Martin Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium Gwiwer Posted July 17, 2011 RMweb Premium Share Posted July 17, 2011 I'm quite happy with it as it is. Do we really need a change? Can we even include a new image in a sig since I believe that function was disabled at one time? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium Peter Beckett Posted July 18, 2011 Author RMweb Premium Share Posted July 18, 2011 There may be some confusion regarding my original request. There is nothing wrong with the DURM graphic as used in signatures but when used in the Groups Directory http://www.rmweb.co....t=&order=&st=10 the logo becomes "squashed" Peter (now in Halls Creek, WA) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium Gwiwer Posted July 18, 2011 RMweb Premium Share Posted July 18, 2011 Ah - misunderstood the context of the original request as you say. Can't come up with anything better in the short term but if another member perhaps has a square-format graphic of a UK loco which can be rendered upside down ..... ? B) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium kevinlms Posted July 19, 2011 RMweb Premium Share Posted July 19, 2011 Ah - misunderstood the context of the original request as you say. Can't come up with anything better in the short term but if another member perhaps has a square-format graphic of a UK loco which can be rendered upside down ..... ? B) An idea that comes to mind, is an incident that occured to 37 143 which fell down an embankent in January 1975. Due to its location and being stuck in mud in Ebbw Vale, it took 8 months to recover. http://docs.c37lg.co.uk/syphon_30.pdf About half way. I've seen a photo showing the underneath I think, perhaps thats what you have in mind? Kevin Martin Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stuart-AU Posted January 1, 2012 Share Posted January 1, 2012 HI.. The idea behind the image was that because it was a forum for UK model railways (hence the loco) and we live in Australia (the outline of Austral;ia) it was my way of bring both together in the sig.. Stuart in OZ Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mr45144 Posted January 1, 2012 Share Posted January 1, 2012 Only problem I have with it is that you, as ever, forgot to include the mainland. :-). The West Island is there... Kev. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SRman Posted January 1, 2012 Share Posted January 1, 2012 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
milkman matt Posted March 2, 2012 Share Posted March 2, 2012 wouldn't that be the Wist Island Bro! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.