shortliner Posted January 20, 2016 Share Posted January 20, 2016 (edited) Ah,Yes! The Patch! An excellent plan incorporating street-running and switching and concrete canyons - much fun and great for experienced modellers, but not one that I would choose for a beginner - although fine for inspiration Edited January 20, 2016 by shortliner Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
torikoos Posted January 20, 2016 Share Posted January 20, 2016 Hi all, I've recently started to redesign half of my layout, as I'm not happy with the way it operates. It was originally designed as a switching layout, but I expanded it and as such, and not in a good way, so the operational potential is not ideal. Besides, I've since learned more on operations, and it's something I'd like to try and encorporate more of on my new track plan. I've developed the plan in stages, and I'd like to show you where I'm at now. Version 1: Version one has all the basics , but is lacking in two things, there’s no drill track although the spur between the left yard ladder and the two curved turnouts could function as that. This track could also accommodate cabooses or road power waiting for the next assignment. So , developing on from that is version 2: I worked on this version a bit more, to highlight the reason why the yard is ‘bend’, a chimney is the reason. I have changed the left yard area to incorporate a yard drill track, which will enable switching with additional flexibility to operate the main and siding. A turnout was replaced by a double slip crossing, enhancing operations further, but also still retaining the track for caboose or road power. Road power, now also have a servicing facility to park up, by adding another turnout in the main. Version 2 can still be further enhanced, by moving the curved turnouts further into the curve, giving more space for the ‘caboose track’, and a bit more distance between the curved turnout and the most left yard ladder turnout, which will improve operations/ reliability. On the right hand side, the left-hand turnout could be replaced by a right-hand turnout immediately after the most right one. This will extend both the siding and receiving track by about 1 car length. This could then be version 3, and would look like the trackplan below. Any other suggestions are welcome. A few notes however, this is situated in my loft. Those of you familiar with UK houses, know that for some unbeknown reason (well, that reason would be quick and easy construction/cost) there's a plethora of beams and girders in the way, so I need to 'flow around those'. Why they can't use heavier beams and get rid of all those inverted W shape constructions... it would be far more useful doing that... Koos 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr Gerbil-Fritters Posted January 20, 2016 Share Posted January 20, 2016 Couple of questions - what era is it set in, and is it a 'main line' or a quieter backwater sort of line Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
torikoos Posted January 20, 2016 Share Posted January 20, 2016 (edited) Usually a branchline/regional line, era roughly early 80's, sometimes early 90's depending on which roster I put on the layout. I've already changed the turnout leading to the service facility into a right hand one, such that the 'main' has the 'straight' and not the diverging route. As above. Edited January 20, 2016 by torikoos Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
torikoos Posted January 20, 2016 Share Posted January 20, 2016 (edited) Hi Simon, No I don't have the double slip yet, I 'glued' it in there during the track plan evaluation, trying to keep the track length as long as possible. I am aware that they are not as common in the US, but any railroad would prefer not to use them as they are expensive etc. Yes there are two lines approaching from the left. The outer comes from 'staging' (rest of world), the inner is visible and comes from another 'town' with a few small industries. These two tracks eventually join up again at the curved turnout on the right, so there are two loops going around at present. It gives me the option to both have something moving if I feel like it and sit back to watch, but also to operate. In any case, what you're suggesting would look like this: Koos Edited January 20, 2016 by torikoos Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium skipepsi Posted January 21, 2016 RMweb Premium Share Posted January 21, 2016 As you might be able to tell by the sudden silence I have come over all indecisive, I think I am going to get the full length in backing paper and then lay out three alternative plans based around suggestions on here that I like. I also have available a short crossing and a three way point Peco. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
torikoos Posted January 21, 2016 Share Posted January 21, 2016 Always a good idea to lay things out before commiting to buy and build, I'm going to do the same. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium skipepsi Posted January 21, 2016 RMweb Premium Share Posted January 21, 2016 Apart from more flexible track I don't intend buying any more track items apart from switch stands and possibly bumpers. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
torikoos Posted January 21, 2016 Share Posted January 21, 2016 I like that modification Simon, I've redrawn it, using a Y to smooth it out even further, although I admit my drawing skills need to improve and could trim the curves a bit more, but the idea is clear enough. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium skipepsi Posted February 14, 2016 RMweb Premium Share Posted February 14, 2016 (edited) I have finally got a plan of sorts my use of AnyRail is poor but essentially it is Ian's plan stretched to 13 ft long and 15 inches wide in HO. The idea is that there will be tall buildings along the back medium in between the loop and low rise at the front. The operation of switches will be a hand from above and polarity will be covered by insulating fish plates, uncoupling will be by skewer. This may seem primitive but it is affordable. The buildings will be plug in with assorted junk round the base but reusable elsewhere if the baseboards are unreliable. As it is half term week I hope to have the boards cut down braced covered in cork and track cut to size and laid ready for wiring by the end of the week. Mrs B wants her craft room emptying and repacking so the plan may struggle but it is plan A. Edited February 14, 2016 by skipepsi 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium skipepsi Posted February 14, 2016 RMweb Premium Share Posted February 14, 2016 After being pointed to this Youngstown is a possible layout name.http://donsdepot.donrossgroup.net/dr0801/yst663.jpg Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium skipepsi Posted February 28, 2016 RMweb Premium Share Posted February 28, 2016 After a week of moving plan A about the house it has been dismantled and sent outside on its way to the tip. It was a bit numb to put it politely. Yesterday I purchased 5 Celotex boards from Wickes so light I can carry the stack on one hand. Now all I need to do is look at how to make baseboards, I think I will make a supporting ladder like structure for underneath to rest on my trestles or drop leaf table and then look at how to join the boards together. As I understand it boards are faced with thin ply to protect the edges. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
shortliner Posted February 28, 2016 Share Posted February 28, 2016 (edited) Mick - depending how big you want to go, and if you fancy urban - see http://bigbluetrains.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=46&t=8770 Edited February 28, 2016 by shortliner Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium skipepsi Posted February 28, 2016 RMweb Premium Share Posted February 28, 2016 It is on RMWeb now Jack as well. I think it is too big for me as a single worker and unable to leave the layout in siitu between operating sessions, if I built that it would be spend an hour building it up and loading with stock and the same to break it down each session. Something that takes about 20 cars max and two locos would be more successful I think. The boards have a length of 1.2 metres and a width of 0.45 metres so I think a main layout of 4.8 metres x 0.45m and a practice board 1.2x0.45 m. I have some white faced hardboard to hand so I can use that to face the practice board when I find out which glue to use. After that I am sure there will be plenty of small plans to choose from. Hopefully this way I can learn from my mistakes before tackling the bigger layout. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
shortliner Posted February 28, 2016 Share Posted February 28, 2016 Having spent Friday and part of Saturday, at the Glasgow show switching sweetener tanks on Chris Gilberts "Silver Star Industrial Park", (2 freemo boards and a staging board) I can recommend what is basically an Inglenook in 10'. It will eventually be enlarged with additional extension boards 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
F-UnitMad Posted February 28, 2016 Share Posted February 28, 2016 (edited) Having spent Friday and part of Saturday, at the Glasgow show switching sweetener tanks on Chris Gilberts "Silver Star Industrial Park", (2 freemo boards and a staging board) I can recommend what is basically an Inglenook in 10'. It will eventually be enlarged with additional extension boardsI can thoroughly recomend looooooonnnnnnnng Inglenooks. Simple track arrangement maybe, but the extra distance to travel, & spot cars, adds to the time taken. My simple branch in O can take an hour to switch just a few cars, without even adding "make believe time" for air/brake tests. Edited February 28, 2016 by F-UnitMad Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium skipepsi Posted February 28, 2016 RMweb Premium Share Posted February 28, 2016 At the moment I am thinking Ian's Concrete Canyon layout still but stretched and widened so a longer distance to travel between placing cars but I am always going to be open to ideas until I start ballasting. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Satan's Goldfish Posted February 28, 2016 Share Posted February 28, 2016 I keep buying n gauge crossings with the thought of one day doing an American layout (now up to 5x 30 degree and 2x 90 degree) but these shunting plans are catchy! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Satan's Goldfish Posted March 1, 2016 Share Posted March 1, 2016 How does this work/look then? Never did like the tightness on the end curves of the figure 8 plan several pages ago, so here's the doughnut plan (sorry, being American it should probably be the 'Donut' plan) I've put more thought into operations and theme here. The ficticious location is somewhere in Florida, the blue twin track line is Norfolk Southern (like i said, ficticious!), the red lines are more along the lines of a class 2 railroad (although still fairly busy judging by it's twin tracks), something like Florida Coast maybe. And the light green are 'short lines' but associated with the class 2 concern. Cane Sugar related traffic would be the main comodity on scene with relevant facilities in the switching yard, but with lots of other types of freight passing through. Wrapping a triangle into a circle was certainly interesting! Train length pending, this layout wouldn't be too big in N. The red line is on scene all the way around with easy routes off scene along the short lines. My main points of confusion concern the NS line. As drawn as a triangle it only has one short spur to reach the exchange loops. If left like this then there's potentially reversing moves onto and off of the mainline. Is this acceptable in North American practice? (If not, another access can be added the otherside of the double diamond crossing to go the other way (drawn in pink)). My second 'stuck' moment is what to do with the NS line when it reaches the front of the layout? It could probably 'off scene' drop under the rest of the tracks and have a storage yard at a lower level, but how do i get it 'off scene' at the front of the layout in some fairly flat Florida scenery?! I don't have a plan for the switching yard yet, but shunting to various loading/unloading and silos would be the main theme. I enjoy seeing some of the 'street running' youtube videos so some of that has slipped in on one of the short lines. Any thoughts? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SAW Posted March 16, 2016 Share Posted March 16, 2016 Yes thats the one, when I built it I added 2 sector plates at each end and added 2x 2ft sections to both sides of the layout http://www.blackbear...om/SoPlains.htm Is this track plan or any more info about it still on the web somewhere ? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mog Posted March 25, 2016 Share Posted March 25, 2016 A Plea for some ideas / help for you trackplanners.. (Attention Shortliner! ) My current layout, Brett, sits on rack shelving and is 8 feet long (1 ft wide). The wall is actually 13 feet, and there is scope to extend. I'm thinking of getting rid of Brett rather than extending it, and starting again. I'm after some track plan ideas... the parameters are.. <>HO North American. Most likely 80s/90s onwards probably New England shortline connecting with VTR. Pretty low key rural switching. <> Probably use Peco 83. If I can stick to no6 min turnouts and 24" radius curves, then great.. but I'm flexible on that. <>The space available: Wall A is 13 feet long. Layout would need to be on a shelf around 5ft off the floor and ideally 1 ft wide (might be able to push out to 18" but rather not. Wall B is to the left end of A at right angles and is 8 feet long. It is a stud wall and I only envisage a very slim single track run along here. Another 90 degree turn to the left and Wall C is 7 feet. This is over my desk and again ideally limited to 1 ft wide. I was thinking ( and starting to doodle ideas) around a simple 'yard' on wall C, running along the stud wall, and into a switching area on A. One of Lance Mindheim's plans fit quite well there. This is REALLY rough - the 'yard' bit particularly! https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-tnO1yt9GuBE/Vt3YQqRJyJI/AAAAAAAACTU/TjrMnYdtglE/s1600/2016d.bmp If anyone has any ideas, always welcome! One alternative I thought of is to stick the staging on the right of the long wall instead. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GP9u Posted March 26, 2016 Share Posted March 26, 2016 (edited) A very nice design. Will be fun to operate. Couple of thoughts: You could extend the runaround track further to right as you only need the length of your engine(s) past the last switch. That way you could bring more cars to town and switch more of the spots with one train. You could gain even a bit more length in the runaround at the left end of the siding if you used a R/H switch coming off the curve in the top left corner as well. That would eliminate the S curve there. Also, if you made a pinwheel ladder into the staging/interchange yard you could almost double the siding lengths and eliminate the S curves. You'd have to get rid of the track going off to the left, but the track against the wall in the yard could be the interchange with the "rest of the world" instead. If you could double the yard capacity, looks like you'd have space for about 24 cars. And you have about 12 spots and you would be able to fit about 8-9 in the longer run around track. So you could switch up to 8-9 spots per train, and only have the same cars showing up at the industries after 2 trains instead of 1. That would be without having to manually replace any cars in staging between sessions. If you want to get fancy, you could run a switch lead from staging up the inside of the main. Then you'd have "live" interchange yard and could have two trains/crews working at once. One to swap cars from interchange and make up the train for town, the other to switch town. Nice! Pete Edited March 26, 2016 by GP9u Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mog Posted March 26, 2016 Share Posted March 26, 2016 Cheers, some good ideas there. My only concern with the 'yard' bit is about interference with headspace over my desk! (and access to the layout over same desk). This may get built in phases anyway, with the main switching bit being fed by a simple narrow two track fiddle shelf on the stud wall to start with. Had another play with the plan, incorporating some of your ideas.. 2016f.jpg Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
shortliner Posted March 27, 2016 Share Posted March 27, 2016 (edited) Martin, only just seen this - had a small idea - can you send me the XTrkCad plan and I'll add my suggestion - Jack( Chacmool at lineone dot net ) Edited March 27, 2016 by shortliner Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zomboid Posted March 27, 2016 Share Posted March 27, 2016 Your original idea is pretty much my "when I have loads of time and space for a train set" plan. The updated one is good too, but I prefer where you started from. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now