bmthtrains - David Posted January 23, 2013 Share Posted January 23, 2013 While researching various types of on track plant for turning into possible models, a basic question has got me stumped: why don't tampers and MPVs etc have class numbers under TOPS? And what does DR stand for in front of the vehicle number? Curious as why an MPV for example isn't a class 219 for example David Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rivercider Posted January 23, 2013 Share Posted January 23, 2013 While researching various types of on track plant for turning into possible models, a basic question has got me stumped: why don't tampers and MPVs etc have class numbers under TOPS? And what does DR stand for in front of the vehicle number? Curious as why an MPV for example isn't a class 219 for example David From my time working in TOPS offices in the 1980s and 1990s I think the 'D' was for Departmental. the 'R' definitely at one time meant 'reportable (to TOPS)' though I don't ever remember anyone actually phoning in to TOPS to report a tamper on the move! Edit - and I think a DX prefix meant 'departmental not reportable to TOPS'. Other on-track plant like cranes and ballast cleaners that would be hauled in a train were reported to TOPS. cheers Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rivercider Posted January 23, 2013 Share Posted January 23, 2013 Thinking further about this, and sticking my neck out a bit, from the 1980s I seem to remember that the third letter of the prefix, if there was one, referred to the maker of the plant, for example DRP built by Plasser and Theurer DRT built by Taylor and Hubbard DRC built by Cowans Sheldon cheers Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pugsley Posted January 23, 2013 Share Posted January 23, 2013 I think the third letter only applies to cranes, and there was another letter to denote which department was responsible for said crane. ADRC is one that springs to mind. You're spot on about the DR and DX, that's pretty much how I understand it too. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold 96701 Posted January 24, 2013 RMweb Gold Share Posted January 24, 2013 The prefix A in ADRC was to denote that the owning department was Mechanical & Electrical Engineer, so all breakdown cranes built by Cowans Sheldon were ADRC, whereas those general purpose cranes owned by the Civil Engineers and built by Cowans were DRC. As an aside, the numbers on cranes meant something too. Civil Engineers Cranes start with 8, the second digit was for the prime mover 0 = steam, 1 = diesel, the third digit means the power transmission and capability as follows:- 0 = mechanical light duty 1 = mechanical heavy duty 2 = electric light duty 3 = electric heavy duty 4 = hydraulic light duty 5 = hydraulic heavy duty I seem to recall that light duty is less than 10t maximum Safe Working Load (SWL). Examples would be DRT 813XX is a Taylor Hubbard Diesel Electric with a SWL 10t or more, DRS 810XX is a Smiths Diesel Mechanical with a SWL less than 10t (not sure that there were any of the latter). Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
eastwestdivide Posted January 25, 2013 Share Posted January 25, 2013 If you can get hold of the Platform 5 book Track Machines (1984-ish), there's a detailed explanation of the CEPS (Civil Engineers Plant System) numbering, covering the earlier DB965xxx numbering, as well as the 5-digit DR or DX prefixed system. Also even earlier regional numbering systems. For example, to add to 96701's cranes post above, 80xxx = CCE (chief civil engineer) steam crane 81xxx = CCE diesel crane (not all the 8xxxx were cranes, e.g. 82xxx = Viaduct inspection unit 86xxx = Rail joint straighteners etc...) and 95xxx = CM&EE (chief mechanical & electrical engineer) steam crane 96xxx = CM&EE diesel crane Other, more current books may well be available! And there's a website with sightings and plenty of detail at http://www.ontrackplant.com/sightings and this site lists number ranges: http://www.ltsv.com/w_ref_numbers_ceps.php Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bmthtrains - David Posted January 25, 2013 Author Share Posted January 25, 2013 Thanks everyone, very interesting - quite a complicated subject it seems too! David Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.