RMweb Gold 81C Posted September 21, 2014 RMweb Gold Share Posted September 21, 2014 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold The Stationmaster Posted September 21, 2014 RMweb Gold Share Posted September 21, 2014 Well that one can only go on one side Bob as there's no room for it on the other side. Ideally it should be at the toe end of the point and preferably slighty beyond the toe end of the point so the person working it can handsignal a movement back over the point after making sure it is properly closed. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold The Stationmaster Posted September 21, 2014 RMweb Gold Share Posted September 21, 2014 Thanks for that Mike, I think I will connect that one to the box and have the next turnout along on the frame, Its me being lazy as I did not want to put so much rodding in. Second question if you would be so kind, the second turnout does not have a trap point covering it so will the lever be locked from the box and interlocked with signals if so will shunting disc be suitable bearing in mind this is all an area of sidings, again I'm trying to redue the amount of point rodding but I do want it to look right. It really all depends at what happens at the other end of where they go to Bob - any chance of a pic looking in the opposite direction? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
neilrh Posted September 21, 2014 Share Posted September 21, 2014 I believe the reason for a catch point is to prevent runaways from fouling the main line. So it's not so much of an issue that the turnout can be locked from the box, but what's going to stop stuff rolling from where it's supposed to be. An alternate option to a catch point is to have a headshunt, even a short one, where you switch to the head shunt when traffic is not transitioning from the main. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold The Stationmaster Posted September 22, 2014 RMweb Gold Share Posted September 22, 2014 So - assuming the line next to the platform is not a passenger line (because if it is then there's a trap point missing) all of those points would be worked by hand levers as part of the yard and no need for a ground frame. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
neilrh Posted September 22, 2014 Share Posted September 22, 2014 Looking at photo #2, assuming that the headshunt is the terminating line on the right of the photo, then it is protecting anything that is out of shot to the right of the turnout there. All the other sidings(?), the 5 alongside the station road are unprotected - this leaves the question is the station road a passenger line or will it be fenced off and used for freight only? In which case you may only need a trap point (or headshunt) before it joins the two track main off scene behind the camera. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MarkAustin Posted September 23, 2014 Share Posted September 23, 2014 There is a head shunt, I can work the yard without interfering with the mainline. If there is a headshunt, you don't need a trap point. The headshunt serves that purpose, and tounouts controlling access to the headshunt/main line would be under the signalman's control. Mark A Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
neilrh Posted September 23, 2014 Share Posted September 23, 2014 With this latest picture, if the (fully visible) point on the left side, leads to main & headshunt, then you're covered, no trap required. This point and the turnout from the main to the yard would be box controlled (linked) - with everything from the point underneath the screwdriver on switched locally in the yard. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold The Stationmaster Posted September 23, 2014 RMweb Gold Share Posted September 23, 2014 The line by the platform is a siding there will be a fence along the edge, it had to be wide to take a standard foot bridge as it was part built when purchased. Excellent - all the siding points, except the connection into the running line will have individual hand lever boxes as can be seen in some of the pics in this thread http://www.rmweb.co.uk/community/index.php?/blog/1563/entry-14262-sproston-hand-point-levers-and-some-signalbox-progress/ Bob at Alton did have some a while back in his 'clearance' box on the counter but I might have bought all of them, but on the other hand I might have missed some The only point worked from the signalbox, as a crossover with the running line end, is where the yard lines join the running line (bottom left of your most recent pic) and there will also be a signal there. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold The Stationmaster Posted September 2, 2015 RMweb Gold Share Posted September 2, 2015 That 'box was built to hold a 71 lever frame Bob (it would probably have taken a few more than that if required). That frame was replaced by a new 51 lever frame in 1971. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold gwrrob Posted September 2, 2015 RMweb Gold Share Posted September 2, 2015 That looks a rather nice box Bob. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
28XX Posted September 2, 2015 Share Posted September 2, 2015 As far as I remember (1982) a single lever controlling both ends of a crossover was common in ex GWR and other railways mechanical boxes. The end nearest the box would be (say) 18a and the end furthest away 18b. Two compensators required on the run, one for [box to a] And another for [ a to b]. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold The Stationmaster Posted September 3, 2015 RMweb Gold Share Posted September 3, 2015 Thanks for that Mike I've just come back in from the man cave, that's 2 Wills signal box kits to buy, I had to go larger for the box as the Blue Anchor was too small next up was 2 Ratio kits spliced together and that looked naff. Another question if I may Tyseley box had a crossover, one road to another on the same lever was that common practise on the main line or did each switch have it's own lever & rodding ? Standard arrangement is a single lever working both point ends - in fact unusual for it to be any different but there were sometimes reasons for it to be done 'unusually'. Depending on distance a single ver could readily work several point ends; the heaviest lever I have ever worked - admittedly with the rodding in a poor state - had one end of a single slip and one end, but both switches, of a double slip on it so it was working 3 sets of switches. Far less common but it did happen - and was a right pig to get working smoothly - was to use one lever to work the Facing Point Locks at both ends of a facing crossover - also a major nuisance during disconnections hence the idea wasn't much liked by anybody! PS the newest Ratio GWR signalbox really doesn't work out at all when trying to double or increase its size - which is also a right nuisance. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.