The continuing story.
I replied with a simple, tongue-in-cheek:
<quote>
Hmmmm . . . .
Not sure that Trading Standards would agree with you on that!
<unquote>
which must have caused a degree of unintentioned consternation as it generated the following:
<quote>
Thank you for your comment. By all means please give our listing and
contact details to Trading Standards. If they can advise us of the BS or
ISO standards that define course and fine scale as absolutes and that to
which this Lima track is compliant we will happily change the listing. We
can't find anything more than subjective descriptions of the same. The turn
outs excluded the track pieces are closer in appearance to Peco finescale
than Hornby Mecanno course scale track. However we would welcome guidance
from the better informed, or indeed you, should you choose to be helpful in
any future communication. If not, we thank you for your time and wait to
hear from Trading Standards, although we are doubtful of their interest as
we are not seeking to profit from deliberately mis-describing or
mis-selling an item - quite the opposite in fact, but thank you again for
your concern.
-from_fire_and_flames
<unquote>
Admittedly it would have been easier to follow if "fire_and_flames" had replied in English, but I think the gist is that they don't think much of my questioning their listing!
If anyone else would like to join in, please feel free to do so!