Jump to content
 

scottystitch

RMweb Gold
  • Posts

    1,494
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by scottystitch

  1. 21 hours ago, Compound2632 said:

     

    That's where the return loop scores, if one has room for it. Ideally a double return loop with a double junction as a scenic feature, then much of the loop itself can be part of the modelled railway. 

     

    Might work best in 7.25" gauge, with a double track main line round the estate.

     

    I posted this rough concept earlier in the thread, but I'm sure it will have been lost in the great photo pause. This was my idea for a user friendly Minories "system" with an out and back "fiddle Yard":

     

    Minories.jpg.52839d434f38e45c2e5d0e5ce22196bb.jpg

     

     

     

     

     

    • Like 8
  2. Hello,

     

    I have a question with regard to Carflat trains, new vehicle transport as opposed to MOtorail services.

     

    I am modelling the period '62-63 and am using the NGS/Farish Carflat A to model a train.  At this time the guard would need to be accommodated in a vehicle at or towards the rear of the train, unless I've got things very wrong in my head.  Would this have utilised a BG of either pre or post-nationalisation origin, or would a goods brake van have been used?

     

    The only photograph I have in my collection that shows a whole train is in "Last Years of the Waverley Route", David Cross, but the train is so long that it is impossible to tell what the guard's vehicle is, although it does look like a coach rather than a brake van.  I'm struggling to find other images on line that show the guard accommodation, but I may be using the wrong search words.

     

    Any help on this would be gratefully appreciated.

     

    Best

     

    Scott.

  3. I visited on a two day stopover in Los Angeles in 2019.  We stayed at a hotel at Tehachapi itself and then headed down to the loop one morning en-route Bakersfield to meet a friend.

     

    It's a wonderful location, with good access and plenty of good angles, although sitting in a valley, the sun takes a while to get over the ridgeline.  Traffic flow is quite high as well.

     

    Best

     

    Scott.

    • Like 1
    • Agree 1
  4. Would it help if we had a list of what Accurascale offer/have offered in OO gauge?:

     

    Locomotives

     

    Class 30/31

    Class 37

    Class 50

    Class 55

    Class 89

    Class 92

    GWR 7800 Manor

     

    Coaches

     

    BR Mark 1 Non-gangway Suburban - BS, BT, CL, S, SLO, T, TO

    BR Mark 2b - BFK, FK, QXA (RTC Test Vehicles), SK, TSO

    BR Mark 2c - BFK, BSO, FK, FO, SK, SO, TSO, TSO(T)

    Mark 5 - Caledonian Sleeper

    Mark 5a - TransPennine Express

    GWR Siphon G

     

    Wagons

     

    CDA China Clay

    Cemflo/PCV

    KAV/Coil A

    Cutdown HYA Hopper

    FNA-D Nuclear Carrier

    HOP24 HUO

    HYA-IIA Hopper

    IIA Biomass

    JSA Coil Carrier

    KUA Nuclear Carrier

    MDO/MDV 21 Ton Mineral

    HAA Hopper

    HBA Hopper

    HCA Hopper

    HDA Hopper

    HMA Hopper

    MHA Ballast Wagon

    NER 20T Hopper

    NER 4T Chaldron

    PCO17B/C PCA Cement

    PFA Container Flat

    PTA/JTA+JUA Tippler

    SR Banana Van

     

    Best

     

    Scott.

     

     

     

     

     

    • Like 4
    • Agree 1
    • Thanks 2
    • Round of applause 1
  5. Adhering to Fran’s request for shrinking of OO models already on their books:
     

    For me, I’d like to see the HUO to Accurascale standards along with the 21T Mineral. 

     

    I’d also buy a skinhead 31. 
     

    although too modern for me, the Mark 2s I think would be a particularly attractive proposition for the N Gauge community, esspecially if released in multiple versions at once. It would probably make sense to do different sub types (C, D, etc) from the Farish tooling. 



     

    Best

     

    Scott. 

    • Like 1
  6. 8 hours ago, Ron Ron Ron said:

    Why shoot down the balloon with an air-to-air missile, blowing its payload to smithereens, when the F-22 has a 20mm cannon?


    I’m purely speculating and am probably well wide of the mark, but wouldn’t putting holes in the balloon envelope, result in a descent rate that would allow the payload to be recovered, reasonably intact, even if damaged, rather than having to search the sea and sea bed for fragmented wreckage, scattered over a wider area and risk not finding everything that came down?

     

     

     

     

    .

    The AIM-9 has a fragmentation warhead, and a proximity detonator, the effect being rather like a FlaK shell, so I’m not sure it would Be blown to smithereens. It’s interesting though, the seeker on an AIM-9 is infrared so the object must have been putting out a decent heat signature. 
     

    On top of that I’d suggest a guns attack would involve the interceptor having to close to a much closer range, potentially endangering it if the ballon reacted with an unpredictable flight path after it had been hit. 
     

    just my thoughts. 
     

    Best

     

    Scott. 

    • Like 1
  7. 4 minutes ago, 03060 said:

     

     

     

    I keep a rough record of WHL photographers on Flickr in a notebook, but can't always then 'refind' images that I know that I've seen before as I can't remember who they were by .....

     

    Regards,

    Ian.

    Flickr has a feature that allows you to designate any picture a "favourite".  This will then be remembered in a "favourites" folder of sorts.

     

    To the bottom right of the image you are looking at, there is a star shape. If you click on that the image is placed in your "favourites" to be viewed whenever you fancy.

     

    Best


    Scott.

    • Thanks 1
  8. 16 hours ago, Revolution Ben said:

     

    That is subjective!  I had read that they were uncomfortable but having travelled from Exeter to Paddington and London to York and Newcastle on them I found the seats are very comfortable - nice and firm.

     

    The ride quality is poorer than Mk3 stock though which, for me, is unsurpassed to me in terms of overall ride comfort.

     

    cheers

     

    Ben A.

    Montrose to Kings Cross (in one go), multiple times, and I couldn't see what all the fuss was about in honesty. I actually found it was better for the posture than many other train seats and certainly nowhere near as uncomfortable as all the horror stores led me to believe.

     

    Best


    Scott.

    • Agree 2
  9. 21 minutes ago, Classsix T said:

    Topic discussion from here: 

    It looks like you will Scott. All of the DLC you already have migrates over to TSW3 but it won't have the weather upgrades etc.

     

    C6T.

     

     

    Ah. I missed your commentary back in August. Thanks.

     

    However...*sigh*

     

    Best

     

    Scott.

    • Agree 1
  10. I've been out of the loop with TSW on PS4.  Wots...uh the deal with TSW3 ? I have TSW2 installed. Do I need to shell out  for Mk3 should I want to purchase the upcoming Edinburgh - Glasgow Express package? Anyone know?

     

    Best

     

    Scott.

  11. This will be an unpopular view, I appreciate, but it looks like the room is too small for what you're trying to achieve, not helped by the requirement to change height.

     

    Depending on the length of your trains would this be a potential solution, a train lift?

     

     

    Best

    Scott.

    • Interesting/Thought-provoking 1
×
×
  • Create New...