Jump to content
 

CKPR

Members
  • Posts

    1,516
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by CKPR

  1. Just to let you all know that I'm still pottering along in the senior scale, collecting kits, including a large pile of ABS wagons, for an Autumn building campaign and working away on various common or garden LNER wagons. Now, the Parkside O gauge range - the first one I built, I wasn't impressed with the underframe and used part of my precious stock of ABS and ex-CCW (!) parts to rebuild it. Then I discovered that all Parkside kits have pretty much the same not very good underframe. Hmmm, I must admit that I was expecting better as these were scarcely better than the old 3H kits, which at least had a certain charm to them. 

    • Interesting/Thought-provoking 1
    • Friendly/supportive 1
  2. As for No.3, there's actually more work been done than is perhaps obvious. I reassembled the narrowed footplate and then realised that the front buffer beam was all wrong. Fair to say that these M&CR double buffer beams are starting to do my head in ! Going by the photograph in "Rails Through Lakeland" of No.3 at Bassenthwaite on the CK&PR, her front buffer beam was just a normal if deep rectangle without any curvy bits. And this after I narrowed the original one. I then discovered that the tender side frames for No. 3 were different to the ones I'd originally made when the tender was destined for No.20...at this rate, I'll have most of the  parts in stock for the second attempt at No. 20. 

     

    Update: I'm looking to get a proper Rotring techical drawing template in order to mark out the new tender sideframes.

    20230823_190845.jpg

    • Like 7
    • Craftsmanship/clever 1
    • Friendly/supportive 5
  3. I would suggest very gently embossing the rivets from the reverse with an engineers scriber rather than glueing anything onto the overlap - this is fiddly enough in 4mm using styrene ! The use of a second  printed side to make strapping and corner plates is also a return to old school modelling of the 1940s & 50s. Another name to look for in old magazines is Derek Sackett who wrote a few articles on card modelling in the 1960 & 70s.

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1
  4. On 15/08/2023 at 10:56, exmoordave said:

    My mate bet me £100- that I couldn't do a butterfly impression. 

    I thought that's got to be worth a little flutter........

    Mind you, I was offered a bet in the  butchers that I could have the meat on the top shelf for free if I could reach it but I would pay double if I couldn't. I turned it down - the steaks were too high.

    • Funny 10
  5. Slightly off topic but I try to avoid adding any styrene parts to my scratchbuilt and kitbuilt brass locomotives and rolling stock. For example, I'll always make cab or brake van veranda  floors out of thin ply. IRRC quite a lot of the older rolling stock running at  Pendon is made of card and ply as per Michael Longridge's book "Building 4mm rolling stock" from the late 1940s and which is well worth reading even today.

    • Like 1
    • Agree 2
  6. Here's a long shot - there was a variant of the BR 12t van that had MOGO type end doors but no side doors (Diagram 1/214). These were used between Metal Box in Carlisle and a creamery at Milnthorpe, presumably because of some specific loading & unloading arrangements. I've always wondering whether MOGOs were also used on this run, albeit I've never seen any photographic evidence.

  7. In the absence of anything more suitable and because I wanted sprung buffers, I used the generic PC short tapered coach buffers on my M&C coaches. For the older style of buffers [self-contained ?] used by the M&C on both coaches and locomotives, the Stroudly / Billington LBSC  white metal buffers produced by 5&9 Models look suitable as do some MR ones that I have (possibly ex-Chowbent Models  and now available from Stevenson or Wizard Models ?). I've got an original Maryport works drawing of the older type of buffer so I've got no excuse really !

    • Like 1
    • Informative/Useful 1
  8. 9 hours ago, Compound2632 said:

     

    The GSWR, MR, and NBR of course participated in through workings just as the CR and LNWR did; surely the CR and LNWR also had services that terminated at Carlisle and would also use the bay platforms?

     

    Which part of the station did the M&CR use?

    The M&C always used the south bay on the down lines that was known rather predictably as the Maryport bay. I'll leave to others to comment on any terminating LNWR or CR services as I can't immediately  think of any.

    • Informative/Useful 1
  9. On 24/06/2023 at 13:52, kevinlms said:

    My wife used to own a horse in a previous (before me) life. One day she found it in the kitchen! No mess, just some difficulty removing it.

    Sounds like the situation was stable...Taxi !

    • Like 2
    • Funny 8
×
×
  • Create New...