FAO Dave at DJM, in particular:
Dave,
I don't know whether this is the best thread to use for this - please advise.
I've been looking through my copy of "Locomotives of the LNER Part 6C" by RCTS, which gives good coverage of his class. I wondered what tender version, or versions, you might produce. I'm interested in the N Gauge model, but these comments apply to any Q6 model (see pp 47-49 of Part 6C).
Five different tenders were used with the class - for convenient reference I'll list them A - E and confine myself to visual differences:
- A) - 3940 gallons, D shaped tender frame slots, coal rails around back of tender, width over sides 7' 5", depth of tank 4' 3" ;
- B) - B - 4125 gallons, D shaped tender frame slots, coal rails around back of tender, width over sides 7' 5", depth of tank 4' 9" ;
- C) - 4125 gallons, oval tender frame slots, coal rails around back of tender, width over sides 7' 5", depth of tank 4' 9" ;
- D) - 4125 gallons, oval tender frame slots, coal rails to back of coal space, width over sides 7' 10", depth of tank 4' 9" ;
- E) - 4125 gallons, oval tender frame slots, coal rails curved down behind coal space, width over sides 7' 10", depth of tank 4' 9" .
I haven't dealt here with the issue of which tenders were self-trimming - this might be significant, depending on how much of the interior you plan to model - maybe a bigger issue for OO?
There were many changes of tender between this class and others (notably Class C7 - the NER Z Atlantics) from 1932 right up to 1954 and this complicates matters.
I guess you'll want to choose a tender version which gives the widest range of locomotives over time, to allow livery variations, etc - in my judgement this is probably version A, used on the earliest NER built batch of 30 locos and, with transfers from B13s, B15s and Q5s amounted to 48 locos eventually. I guess you won't want too much variation in tooling, but unfortunately the preserved loco seems to have version B (I'll look into how and when) and modelling 63395 seems essential. However, the difference would be only in the height of the tender tank - perhaps this would be bearable?
The extensive swapping of tenders will mean that a photo of any planned loco should be consulted, confirming the tender in use at the chosen livery timeframe.
I hope this is helpful - happy to discuss. I'll turn my attention to other detail variations on the locomotives next (all credit to RCTS, by the way).