Jump to content
 

PupCam

RMweb Gold
  • Posts

    313
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by PupCam

  1. 1 hour ago, TrevorP1 said:

     

    I very much like the idea of ambient sound. I find a playlist of period music pleasing now and again. (The 'Housewives Choice' theme for anyone in the 50s or 60s 😄 ? ). A period newsreel would also set the scene but I've yet to find one.

     

    That's taken me back to when I was small young!

     

     

     

    There's even a bit of dH Dragon Rapide action  in the Newsreel 😀  

     

    Being an old "Hatfield Boy"  that's a real bonus!

     

     

    • Like 5
  2. 7 minutes ago, Northmoor said:

    it would come from a speaker under the layout, not on the trains. 

     

    You'll be getting even less Doppler from a stationary speaker!  

     

    The Doppler from the moving loco is imperceptible (but technically there)  at our scales and speeds but you still get the sense of movement of the engine that wouldn't be present with loco sound from a fixed speaker.  The Doppler is not the only aspect that gives the impression of motion (and in reality diminishes as the minimum distance to the target increases).    If you stand at the middle of a 20' long layout, close your eyes you will be able to tell from which direction the train approaches, when it is level with you and in which direction it is departing (assuming you've got reasonably good and matched hearing) all without the microscopic amount of undetectable Doppler.   Just to play Devil's advocate; if you did so, you  would also have the benefit of the image of a perfect locomotive pulling a perfect rake of coaching stock in your mind's eye that doesn't have to gloss over that terribly wonky dome, those wobbling carriages, the really poor weathering on that sub-standard paintwork,  etc etc 😉     Remember the saying the pictures are better on the radio?

     

    I agree that the static sounds of the environment are also needed  to truly complete the sound picture but I do believe that sound can add to the atmosphere and the illusion of a model railway.   It's certainly not compulsory any more than having to work to a perfect gauge/scale relationship is, or use a real rather than imaginary prototype,  exclusion of fixed geometry track work or non-prototypical stock, have working signals etc etc.     

     

    And ultimately in the case of dispute I believe Rule 1 applies.

     

     

     

    • Like 3
    • Agree 1
    • Interesting/Thought-provoking 1
  3. 2 minutes ago, pH said:

    Puppers - is the surgery offering trials of blood pressure medication in co-ordination with a manufacturer?

     

    I wouldn't be surprised!

     

    As Terry Wogan would have said; "Is it me?"

     

     

    • Friendly/supportive 14
  4. Afternoon

     

    12 hours ago, Ozexpatriate said:

     

    I think not but it did land and it did communicate so lets give them 7/10

     

    5 hours ago, Grizz said:

    Mmmmmm with all those behind you ought to apply to work for London’s Premier Transport Provider….you’d be a shoe in. 
     

    Go on a ‘how not to staple your own hand to your own desk’ accident prevention training course.On the basis that someone (a manager already did that).


    Or drugs awareness in the work place….that was fun. Tripping balls for weeks after that mushroom risotto. 
     

    Or the management and reporting of bullying, harassment and violence in the work place, that when you actually experience it from within, they ignor all their own processes and procedures and withhold details and evidence of criminal activity from Police and other law enforcement agencies as it clashes with political ends. 
     

    But obviously you’d still have to attend the mandatory indoctrination and political reconstruction courses, just to ensure that you are up with the latest preferential league tables. Never mind what to your real job in the meantime, as that comes second. 
     

    Also if you don’t go on those courses….it then becomes a disciplinary matter. Seriously.

     

    5 hours ago, BachelorBoy said:

    They managed it. But a lot of people were injured unnecessarily. Perhaps that's acceptable, or even necessary, in a time of a war.

     

    Diversity/inclusion? Plenty of wartime propaganda to encourage men to accept women in factories. and for women to accept they could do men's work.  Plenty of talk about the family of the Empire, people of all races and classes, fighting together and pulling together against Hitler and Tojo.

     

    (it's not a good idea to racially abuse a British West Indian who'd volunteered to defend the Mother Country if you want him to lay down his life for Britain -- mind you there was plenty of racist propaganda to make sure everyone hated the Japanese)

     

    Plenty of training films shown to US soldiers, for example, about what Britain would like when they got there ... how culture was different and how to avoid misunderstandings (eg "fags"). 

     

    Information security and governance? Loose lips sink ships. And volunteers who don't understand why you shouldn't share passwords may well let hackers in to cause all sorts of trouble.

     

    As for mandatory courses? Well, a great way for management to protect itself against volunteers who screw up. If they've been sent on a course, and they still act the wrong way and get the organisation into trouble, then the managers have covered their arses.

     

    The trouble is that most of these courses are nugatory in terms of actually training anyone in anything and ultimately they are purely there to  as BB so succinctly put it "... then the managers have covered their arses".  They also have the added benefit of providing plenty of ticks to go in boxes to make jumped-up middle management look as if they've achieved something  (no wonder I always declined "people management" roles!). 

     

    5 hours ago, Grizz said:

    Oooooooo I forgot the professionally offended. Woah that was an entire two week training course in its own right. 
     

    However L.P.T.P. called them offended victims. And it came with a hand book.
     

    Which informed you how you could be offended on behalf of someone else, even if you weren’t offended yourself, and how the person you were offended on behalf of didn’t need to be present.
     And further how if you failed to report an incident of offence, or potential offence and it later emerged that you knew about it and failed to report and escalate it….then you could be disciplined for gross misconduct and potentially be dismissed. 
     

    Monitoring of people’s speech, language, use and fail to use pronouns, tone of voice and tone of electronic communication all constantly monitored. Leading to a potential tidal wave of malicious and vexatious grievances whenever subordinates were asked to carry out utterly unreasonable and unacceptable requests….erm like their actual job.

     

    5 hours ago, polybear said:

    Which of course means that you've now grassed someone up - and depending on who that "someone" is you're either marked accordingly and "sent to Coventry" or alternatively your Career Prospects just reduced to Nil.

     

    Cynical?  Moi?

     

    But by grassing someone up I'm sure they'd be mightily offended and thus they would have a legitimate reason for invoking the professionally offended grievance procedure   ...........

     

    5 hours ago, BachelorBoy said:

    The content and aims of most of these briefing and training sessions do seem like commonsense much of the time.

     

    But, as has been noted on the internet before, a lot of people do seem to lack common sense.

     

    There's no easy test for who's got commonsense or not, and whether they have the right sort of commonsense for this day and age, and so it's better to treat everyone as if they don't have commonsense. 

     

    5 hours ago, BachelorBoy said:

    But it's not going to be just you, is it? Lots of people will probably say they should be exempted too. Of course, you are a person with commonsense. But how does the RAAF know that? Far easier just to keep giving the briefings. Arses are covered.

     

    But ultimately such a broad brush approach is wasteful of peoples time (time is money), it diminishes respect, is frustrating and as you have already described earlier essentially  just donkey covering and is therefore entirely pointless unless you happen to own the donkey!

     

    A number of organisations I have visited did keep track of "Briefings" & "Clearances" meaning  you were at least only subjected to them once in a time period (1, 2, 3 years etc) otherwise you were escorted at all times by a responsible person, it can be done, it's not that tricky if the organisation CBA.

     

    3 hours ago, monkeysarefun said:

    I sub contract to a sub contractor who sub-contracts to a certain UK defence company who had a bit of a sticky situation involving brown paper bags and  Saudis. As a result I and my sub-contracting fellows have to undertake a yearly ethics training course. Which is a powerpoint presentation where we get to role-play the various characters. 

     

    "Dianne notices that Bill is sending mysterious emails that contain classified documents  and also has recently bought a Lamborghini.

     

    Should Dianne

    A) Ask Bill where he got the money?

    B) Tell Stan, her supervisor about her concerns?" 

    C ) Ask Bill for a ride in his Lamborghini?"  etc etc ....

     

    All 3 in the order:

            C   in order  to get a ride in the Lambo

            A  in order to get her hands on some of that money

            B  in order to stitch him up and "Do the right thing"

     

    😁

     

    2 hours ago, Gwiwer said:

     There are more than 60 "M"s but some have much longer numbers like M275 or even A27(M); is the latter an "M" or is it not?  The answer is both yes and no at the same time.  Confusing? 

     

    Behold!    It's Schroedinger's motorway!

     

    We've got one of those in Puppershire

     

    2 hours ago, southern42 said:

    Nasty thing that CP. I caught it off classroom kids and just thought I had a cold, then flu, then I'm dying. The following morning the Doc said I had CP. Decades on I got the shingles jab. Mr Suvvern had to wait a year as he was just underage. It must cost/production over medical concerns that limits age accessibility because Dad was only in his fifties when he had it bad, bad, bad. Not, not, not nice at all, at all, at all.

     

    Hope granddaughter recovers soon.

     

     

    Does anyone actually understand the logic behind the current Shingles inoculation criteria because this (slightly immune suppressed) Pup doesn't!      As soon as you are 65 you qualify but if you are 65 then you have to wait until 70.  What's that all about?        Which reminds me the pharmacy said it was "quite expensive" @£13 a shot if I wanted to pay for it and not wait.    Seems like a good deal to me, I must go and have it done!  My poor (nearly Centenarian) Mum has just had a dose of it mainly around the eye and it really isn't funny at all.    Fortunately in her case it didn't hang around.      A former colleague (much younger than a 100) had it in and around the eye and he was off work for 18 months and very nearly lost the sight in that eye.

     

    2 hours ago, PhilJ W said:

    My dad was like that having served in Burma, he wouldn't even contemplate buying a Japanese car. I wonder sometimes what he'd make of my current car, a Nissan made in Sunderland.

     

    My "Uncle Bob" (actually just a family friend) also served in Burma and was into motorcycles in general, AJS/Matchless in particular (shame he never got to see my AJ).    Imagine his dismay when a spotty 17 year old Alan turned up on a Honda with a big grin on his face.     How was I to know?   He would not entertain the idea of anything Japanese at all to the day he died which I perfectly understand now but must have got increasingly difficult as the 70's and 80's wore on.

     

    ION

     

    More Pergola prep work has been undertaken; mostly disassembly of the next bit and re-locating the new timbers from the storage location (see I didn't mention the S word) to the "Machining workshop" (The G word).

     

    We've decided someone else can cook tonight so we're off down the pub 😀

     

    TTFN

     

     

     

     

    • Like 17
  5. 2 hours ago, iL Dottore said:

    I think that it depends upon the model. The Viewt (the Jag Mk II tribute) costs ¥2.25 million in Japan so about £17000 or so. A quick Google search revealed a number of Viewts for sale across the globe, but I didn’t drill down for Switzerland.

     

    The appeal of the Viewt got me thinking: how much of a classic car is actually copyrighted? Obviously, the names Jaguar, Rolls-Royce and Bentley are copyrighted up to the hilt and beyond, but what about classic car shapes and design?  With modern 3-D scanning, modern CAD software and modern production techniques. I don’t think it would be all that difficult to create a perfect replica body shell of say, for the sake of argument, a Jaguar Mark II or Bentley S2. I think that with some appropriate tweaks such a body shell could be mounted on a suitable donor chassis and also modified to meet current safety standards, although, (and here I really do not have any idea and I’m wildly speculating) perhaps for very small production run vehicles different standards apply than for large production run vehicles from the big manufacturers).

     

    These essentially identical to original replicas would not be cheap – being a practically bespoke build, but I would view such replicas like I view an artist’s signature model guitar: a way to get a vintage guitar (in all but age) at a less than bank busting prices (my Fender Custom Shop, David Gilmour Black Strat was but a tiny fraction of the $5 million the real David Gilmour Black Strat fetched at auction).


    Not everyone has the reddies to buy a 1952 Bentley Continental R

    image.png.fa83df09b48807deecf6142db59a74b5.png

    (yours for a mere US$ 995,000) But a high quality replica that costs the same as a mid-range BMW would, I think, be sought after.

     

    Were such replicas possible, I would speculate that the replicas could get Bentley, Jaguar, Rolls-Royce, et cetera, rather worried as a lot of  potential customers of theirs would turn away from their bloatmobiles for that classic Jaguar/Bentley/Rolls-Royce look.

     

    If a replica of the 1952 Bentley Continental R above was identical in comfort and style to the original, I wouldn’t be particularly fussed if it didn’t have the Bentley name or badge on it. I would certainly get one if I could – although I would insist on it being finished in British Racing Green with red leather interior.

     

    29 minutes ago, Ozexpatriate said:

    People have been selling replica Carroll Shelby AC Cobras since they stopped manufacturing them. Not to mention Shelby himself.

     

    Oodles of replica 'kit' cars over the years.

     

    Indeed there are and I immediately thought of the C Type Jaguars.   This very interesting and it has to be said, rather depressing article was one of the first hits.  

     

    Looks like the Range Rover replicas* are out then too.      If they get their way, presumably  a number of fine commercially made existing replica vehicles would have to be destroyed if they pursue retrospective application.     Complete Muppetry .... !    

     

    * Not that I'd be wanting one of course, you know me.

     

     

     

     

    • Like 12
    • Informative/Useful 1
    • Interesting/Thought-provoking 1
  6. Evening All

     

    Pergola status: 

          1 Upright made ........................................................  4 to go

          1 Horizontal beam made ......................................... 2 to go

          0 Cross boards (with twiddly ends) made ............. 5 to go

     

    Bear Comms:     There's been some    👍

     

    ION

     

    I've been reading this interesting  article but I think the most astonishing bit is this:

     

    Starlink satellites are designed to make autonomous decisions to maneuver out of the way of other spacecraft based on data provided by the U.S. Space Force and the commercial space awareness firm LeoLabs. Between June 1, 2023, and Nov. 30, 2023, Starlink satellites had to maneuver 24,410 times to avoid collisions, which amounts to around six maneuvers per satellite. While high, that number is falling — but some experts are still concerned.

     

    My emphasis.   

     

    Sort of suggests the statement from the HHGTTG that:    "Space, is big. Really big. You just won't believe how vastly, hugely, mindbogglingly big it is. I mean, you may think it's a long way down the road to the chemist, but that's just peanuts to space"   might not be entirely accurate* 🤣

     

    * I suppose to be fair that particular tiny, tiny little bit of space is particularly well packed and that's probably just to Pee the astronomers off!

     

    I'm tired after all that woodwork so night all!

     

     

     

         

     

    • Like 14
    • Informative/Useful 4
    • Interesting/Thought-provoking 1
  7. 52 minutes ago, Sidecar Racer said:

     

     Not disagreeing with you in principle but surely this can only apply if lets say a manufacturer

    has specified a figure . I can't recall seeing any quoted noise levels for specific vehicles in test

    reports .

     

     Also as to individual reactions , some people love the sound of a screaming two stroke

    race engine and others hate it , so two people with differing opinions on the same sound ,

    substitute any other type of engine and you can get similar responses .

     

    The manufacturers don't specify the figure, they have to comply with the specification which is essentially this for modern cars with a push to lower the levels for future vehicles over the next few years.  One of the very many tests undertaken as part of the type approval testing which have to be passed before the vehicle can be manufactured for sale.      I believe the measurement is taken from 0.5m behind the exhaust outlet.    As I say, personal interpretation or "musical" appeal doesn't enter into it being right or wrong.       That isn't to say there aren't those who don't appreciate the glorious music from certain internal combustion engines;  oh how I wish I had a car with a Merlin engine in it but I bet some of my neighbours are glad I haven't!  

     

    Don't tell  @New Haven Neil but I actually quite like the sound of some Harley Davidsons (there, I've said it) it's only when I actually see them I start feeling rather ill 🤣

     

    Alan

     

     

     

     

     

    • Like 15
    • Agree 1
    • Funny 3
  8. 4 minutes ago, Ozexpatriate said:

    Primate tribalism. Almost all people want to belong to something.

     

    And we don't use the term "fan" (fanatic) for nothing.

     

    It's no different for other "(often rabid) partisan support" for equally tribally binding beliefs like politics, religion, nationalism, and more.

     

    Frankly sports fandom is one of the most benign.

     

    Well until it comes to chucking out time at some local Derbies in the UK!

     

     

     

     

    • Like 2
    • Agree 9
    • Informative/Useful 1
×
×
  • Create New...