Jump to content
 

Natalie

Members
  • Posts

    411
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Natalie

  1. Hi

    I enjoyed the show and found all the stewards, Warley members (of which I am one) and NEC to be friendly, helpful and pleasant.

     

    I thought that I would share my experiences of being at the show as an exhibitor.

     

    I organised a Society stand where I am allowed to sell our own products and memberships.

     

    I get a 6' x 2'6" table free and pay for any additional tables, I pay for an extra one giving us 12' x 2'6" of table. We get 2 free wristbands per each 6' table.  If I require any more wristbands then I can purchase some at the same cost as an advance 2-day ticket, rely on the generosity of the Exhibition Manager or purchase additional public tickets. The downside of this is that before and as soon as the show closes it is classed as a construction site and only those with wristbands will be allowed to remain.

     

    Additionally we have to pay for the space that the tables are sitting on plus 2'6" behind them. If I want an electrical supply then I pay for that.

     

    I receive one car park pass but no tea or food vouchers. Additionally I am unable to claim travel expenses as far as I am aware. Be aware that things like extra car park passes are strictly controlled by the NEC and are not decided by Warley. I simply tell my people (!) the situation and that they need to bring their own food and drink.

     

    Any claims an individual wants to make are taken up with the Treasurer of our Society.

     

    Why do we attend? Because we feel it is important to have a presence at the show. I have found that people think we have folded if we are not at a National show.. It gives people a chance to speak to us, ask questions and seek advice. This helps to partially satisfy our requirements under the Charity Commission for education. 

     

    We are happy to break even or make a small surplus but that is not our reason for attending.

     

    My fellow volunteers came from Telford, Oswestry and Reading amongst others.

     

    We attend because we enjoy it despite the time involved in organising it and physically being at the show. Remember this is not held in a school or a church hall or leisure centre but a professional exhibition venue who have very different requirements.

     

    Nat

    • Like 10
    • Thanks 1
    • Informative/Useful 1
  2. 11 hours ago, Davidjsmith said:

    It is Steam as in video between Fran & Andy!

     

    My suggestion is for a Maunsell Mogul, more specifically an N class. In the section about the Bulleid CIE wagons, unless I misread and misheard the text Fran intimated (apologies if I did mishear) that they were also developing/producing a suitable Irish steam loco for IRM. Guess which railway also had a version of Maunsell Moguls?

     

    I'm probably wrong but the Bachmann N is not that new a model.

     

    Natalie 

    • Like 2
  3. On 21/04/2023 at 23:13, Morello Cherry said:

     

    Interestingly I came across this plan for Portsmouth and Southsea on @Natalie's flickr which shows something similar. If I am reading it right, it looks like platforms 3-5 are electrified and 1-2 aren't. (I am not sure when it dates from).

     

    IMG_9416 Portsmouth & Southsea

     

    My understanding of the plan is the same as yours. I have updated the description to the Flickr image giving details of what it actually is. It is from a set of SR Traffic Control Diagrams located currently in TNA, Kew which although not dated have a covering letter dated November 1947.

     

    The plan is a small section of the Southern Division Area No 3 map. I have the rest of it and the other Southern areas too. I also have some from the other divisions if of interest.

     

    One point of possible interest is that this plan shows Portsmouth (was Town) Loco yard which was later removed to make way for some stabling sidings which may well have had various elements of electrification installed. I think I have copies of a later control diagram which should include the stabling sidings. Portsmouth Town / & Southsea is/ has been an interesting station track and signalling wise of which a lot of the BoT Inspection files and plans are thankfully saved for us at TNA Kew.

     

    Potentially still on topic are a few more locations which might be worth exploring. At Wimbledon and Richmond the bay platforms are electrified for both 3rd and 4th rail dc as a result of sharing the station with LU services. The return 4th rail in these cases I believe is bonded to the running rails to allow dual use of the line. The services at both stations tend to use separate platforms possibly for passenger convenience. 

     

    Let us not forget the LBSCR ac overhead system at Victoria and London Bridge that potentially shared track with the SECR dc 3rd rail especially towards the end when the SR converted it all to dc 3rd rail.

     

    Going back to Manchester Piccadily I have photted the ohle wiring diagrams relating to the 25kv ac system. These again are in Kew. What is of interest is what the plans show is there is continuous wiring between the ac and dc systems with only an insulator separating them electrically. 

     

    An interesting thread indeed.

  4. On 20/04/2023 at 10:12, franciswilliamwebb said:

    sj011125.jpg.ba6214659b3b2413292a97e9aaa9220d.jpg

     

    81017 at Stafford on 28/04/87 (my photo)

    That looks like Euston's Motorail set of mostly Mk1 FK vehicles without the carflats. When not in use for Motorail service (it went to Stirling IIRC) as here the set was available for special traffic. 28th April 1987 was a Thursday.

     

    Great photos Steve.  Do you still have access to the old pics that you posted on a different site to your normal one. Sorry that I can't remember the name.

    • Like 2
  5. On 07/04/2023 at 09:28, franciswilliamwebb said:

    sj010811.jpg.e55df58e7a2aa5dbfb227bbf958a0004.jpg

     

    87027 "Wolf of Badenoch" at Coventry on 17/04/87 (my photo)

    A great photo Steve. Of much interest to the coaching nerds such as myself is the fact that the Wolf is hauling a West Coast Mk3 Pullman set AND via Coventry instead of the Trent as was usual. There were no booked workings of this stock via that route at the time as far as I recall. The 17th April was also a Friday.

     

    Not sure if anything was causing the Trent Valley to be closed which is a bit embarrassing consideringthat I was a signalman along there at the time. It is possible that Coton Crossing box was being abolished at that time but despite being the last signalman on duty there with my closure entry in the block book being made with the book on the bonnet of my car... I don't recall the closure involving a weekday as it was a fairly small job with only a new diagram being required at Tamworth for the Coton area.

     

    Great photo though. Am enjoying seeing some of your classics again.

    • Like 1
    • Informative/Useful 2
  6. On 20/02/2023 at 08:21, franciswilliamwebb said:

    sj038814.jpg.e7f838b54b69d01393d6d12af14d2408.jpg

     

    Class 442 5-WES EMU 2413 at Eastleigh on 26/07/02 (my photo)

    I think that was the day that I had an 'encounter' with a rubbish bin in a car park at EH as a result of ending up working a late then a night shift and the person in charge never thought to do anything about the fact that I didn't have a trained nurse to whom I could leave the keys with after the night shift ones went sick.

     

    It was still a good trip involving a well known modeller and railway writer walking into his closed patio doors whilst we were there having a BBQ...

    • Like 2
    • Interesting/Thought-provoking 1
  7. The top windows in the side on view of the trailer look to have lost their upper curve but they seem to have some element of it in the view showing the trailer end...

     

    The front end is not a game changer to me but the curvature of the upper windows are.

     

    I suspect that it might be an earlier sample we are looking at but have no definive proof.

     

    I shall await the opinion of someone who I respect ie Graham Muspratt who seems to see the same things as me or look at a finished sample at a future show before I decide if I can make a purchase of that magnitude.

     

    I remain hopeful.

    • Like 7
    • Agree 1
  8. Am not into cars at all but wasn't pink an option for Cadillacs in the 1950s? I believe that the King had at least one and there are several rockabilly songs that tell about or are titled "My Pink Cadillac." I have no problem with pink (as long as not neon) and quite like pastel versions of it.

    • Like 15
    • Agree 1
  9. Exactly Bazza.

     

    Additionally they were certainly not tube tunnel friendly either. Tube friendly is of course much lower than the main line sizes.

     

    As regards Edwardian's interesting comments, he misses out a group of people who welcome these coaches as we want to model the upper section of the Circle line that they ran on.

     

    Maybe instead of criticising Dapol for creating a model of real vehicles, he should be critical of Hornby and Hattons for introducing generic freelance coaches rather than a specific model for one railway and then fictional livery applications for the others. But that is a whole different argument which has been well done elsewhere.

     

    I'm looking forward to a set of the preceding 4 wheel Main line and City and Gas train stock... ideally Dapol will do the associated articulated versions of their new announcements.

     

    I could go further and hope that an enterprising manufacturer announces a suite of met dreadnought/ steam stock and electric unit relatives which are even more restrictive geographically than the ML & C stock.

     

    Those of us who wish to model train formations correctly are probably in the minority whilst the rest of us will no doubt buy something as it is the correct company for them or it simply looks nice. It is an individual choice. Our hobby is big and mature enough to enjoy a broad church of opinions and likes.

     

     

     

    • Like 7
    • Agree 1
  10. There was a form 1 or No 1 as we knew them but it was not for sacking people with. It was a formal charge sheet with the room for you to answer. You would then be notified of when, where and by whom the subsequent meeting would take place. If found guilty of said charge, the decision and any punishment which could be loss of travel facilities, suspension, warnings etc you would be informed officially by means of a Form 2. I had three form 1s in my time (and all had a form 2 afterwards...)

     

    In my time they were roughly the size of a landscape A4 folded in half. The rear page was detachable and it was here that you put your reply. You got issued with them at the end of a shift so you always got worried if a yellow van turned up about 10 minutes before the end. They had to be signed for too if i recall correctly. Timewise I had mine between 1986 and 1990.

    • Agree 2
    • Informative/Useful 3
    • Friendly/supportive 2
  11. 22 hours ago, peanuts said:

     

    As Chelsea face up to a trophyless future with no money to spend on transfers, football fans begin to wonder how long government sanctions have been in place at Tottenham.

     

    Younger fans (ie those under about 100) will no doubt be stunned to find out that Spurs used to be known as a cup side (and have won more than Oldham ever have who haven't even got a government sanction to blame- what is their explanation, sorry........)

    • Agree 1
  12. , I am going to take a break from posting here as I am a little fed up of the political postings and the language that is being applied to people or groups who are not responsible for the atrocities of a madman that happens to share their nationality.

     

    This thread is not the correct place to do so in my opinion. I keep my politics out of here as they are probably considered contentious by some. Sorry but this is how I feel.

    • Agree 3
    • Friendly/supportive 16
  13. What influence have Chelsea, ie the players, got on the actions of a dictatorial maniac in another country? Do you really think that Putin gives a toss on Chelsea Football Club.Should any Russian born players now be suspended because of the actions of their native government who they may actually not support? Where does it stop? No Chinese players because of their government, how about no white Americans because of the racist actions of elements of USA authorities?

     

    It is a dangerous precedent to start banning players and clubs because members of their staff happen to come from a country who have a lunatic in charge. What's more I doubt if such actions would have a scrap of interest to the aggressor authority.

     

    As a Spurs fan I remember during the Falklands campaign the disgraceful treatment that Ossie Arrives got from the fans of English teams (especially Leicester City fans during a televised FA Cup match (sorry Neal) to the extent that Spurs' captain Steve Peterman and Garth Crooks objected to it in the post match interviews) for the crime of merely being born Argentine. Do they genuinely believe that he had anything to do with it? It is bonkers. All that resulted is that Ossie felt unwelcome and unsafe here- his adopted home-.and left to play for Paris St Germain.    It is on the same level as during WW2 WW1 (thanks to eastglosmog) apparently renaming German Shepherd dogs as Alsatians and idiots kicking Dachshunds because they were 'german'. Of course they took notice of that...

     

    Deal with warlords by not trading with them or banking with them, not selling them weapons but diplomatically or if necessary militarily. But to ban things in countries who are not directly involved because of a minor connection to me is both clutching at straws and futile.

     

    Ideally crazed, deluded greedy men would stop waging war and distress on others and we could all live together in peace and harmony. There is more chance of Spurs winning the domestic treble than this happening but we can all dream.

     

    Back to football. Oldham putting up a big fight despite the actions of their owner. All credit to the fans fighting to save their football club from this lunatic. When will these owners realise that a football club is not a toy or a plaything for bored rich people. I am sure there are computer games if you want to do that. These clubs belong to their communities and are important to a very lot of people. They should be protected in law from being destroyed by unfit owners but this will never happen as football is essentially a working class game so is of no importance to the powers that be....

    • Like 3
    • Agree 3
×
×
  • Create New...