Jump to content
 

rope runner

Members
  • Posts

    1,045
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by rope runner

  1. 7 hours ago, Corbs said:

    I just wish they acted more like the transport library or RCTS archive and rather than selling the masters only once, sold copies for anyone to use. Such a better resource.


    The sale of railway slides and negatives is big business, especially when copyright is attributed to the buyer as many of these are. There are well-heeled individuals with expansive collections and for traders it's a very cheap way to make £££ - buying job lots at auction and then advertising them with expansive descriptions individually on ebay.

     

    It's not unheard of for some choice industrial negatives to fetch well into three figures! 

     

    Paul A. 

    • Informative/Useful 1
  2. On 22/07/2020 at 16:34, Gordon A said:

    Was the lubricator on the left hand side also original?


    I don't know the history of this loco but HE2868/43 certainly had one fitted when preserved. She was rebuilt by Hunslets with a gas producer system in the early 60's, so possibly acquired it then. 

     

    EDIT - It's the same loco, the re-allocated later works number and spurious name adding to the confusion... so yes, the fitting is original to this rebuilt loco

     

    Paul A. 

    • Thanks 1
  3. While I sympathize with your minor inconvenience with these crank pins it's hardly worthy of a personal attack on the proprietor of the cottage industry who supplied them - a polite email requesting a replacement set is likely all that was required. 

     

    The hobby would be all the poorer for it if suppliers such as this were to throw in the towel - something I'd think we can all agree on. 

     

    Paul A. 

    • Like 2
    • Agree 9
  4. On 02/07/2020 at 18:11, RJS1977 said:

     

    Pity you're in East Anglia - I saw one in a shop in Reading last week (can't remember the price!)

     

    It's not so much finding one which is the issue - it's finding one with defects and price reflecting this. I can't see much point in paying >£70 for a loco which I'll only use the body from... 

     

    Paul A.  

  5. Hi all, 

     

    If anyone has a DJ models Austerity body or poorly running cmplete model I would be very interested in giving it a new home. WIlling to go up to £50 depending on condition. 

     

    I don't mind if handrails are damaged or other minor blemishes. It's destined for an etched chassis with finescale wheels etc. 

     

    Please PM me if you can help

     

    Kind regards

     

    Paul 

  6. On 20/06/2020 at 23:28, Down_Under said:


    looks like the old Jidenco kit of the 25t LNER or hopper 


    Yes, I think I've said before James that these go together easily enough but sadly they're not an accurate representation of the prototype. I've got two built as intended and one which has had lots of changes to bring it closer to the prototype, with limited success it has to be said. 

     

    Paul A. 

  7. Hi All,

     

    Onto the primary building for the layout now which will be covered over a series of posts:

     

    Running shed

     

    Most quarry railways had locomotive accommodation which primarily served as somewhere safe to store the locomotives at night (many were not kept in steam for days on end as per mainline practice) and at weekends. There were more extensive facilities on larger systems as would be expected, notably at Gretton Brook where there was a much-photographed eight road shed which lasted into the 1980s. 

     

    1152023199_BSC14.jpg.b9902b5f1ac4617f0d0a760bfc89d6eb.jpg

    Gretton Brook shed with BSC "55" at Corby. The relative modern permanency of this shed is self evident. Not shown is a further 4 roads to the Right hand side...

     

    Gretton Brook was far from the norm however, and what appeared outwardly to be a "shed in a field" often clad in wriggly tin was much more typical. 

     

    The work undertaken in an industrial loco running shed was often only routine or minor work although “jacking up” on sleepers for attention to springs or axle boxes was not uncommon. Locomotives were often sent away for serious overhauls/rebuilds via the mainline with their connecting rods removed to lessen wear. Even so, such overhauls were still conducted “in house” at places such as Holwell Ironworks, Corby Steelworks workshops and the Central Engineering Workshops (CEW) at Colsterworth.

     

    1288242765_copyrightshed.jpg.6ba0ab875422f1a09033320d095af682.jpg

    A medium/small size running shed more typical of most quarries, this example seen at Woolsthorpe. The shed was dismantled and erected at Cottesmore where it still preserved today. Note the later extension to the front section to house an additional locomotive. 

     

    The model

     

    The model depicts a typical wriggly-tin clad shed constructed around the 1930's-1940's. The example I am taking inspiration from had a wooden frame which hung on metal supports which were secured into the ground with concrete. 

     

    1819496714_shedstructure.jpg.4532d1dc27b535b3ad4f0657d1f41293.jpg

    A closer shot of the Woolsthorpe shed. Wooden frame hung onto steel supports. Inspection pit also evident, a key requirement for oiling up and other routine inspections/duties. 

     

    The model features a laser cut modular frame sandwiched between two brass U sections for strength. These are secured by the mounting frames on I beam which will locate into holes on the layout. Windows are from Mainly Trains etches and are of their large industrial type.

     

    DSC_0719.JPG.eee7029a78003cbcb0e0563b769a6abe.JPG

     

    DSC_0718.JPG.a54e49f27e5d1174cbedd5fe4ddfefd8.JPG

     

    I have been experimenting on how to effectively clad this shed. I have some Eastwell corrugated material for the roof but the sides will have to be in plastic. 

     

    More details to follow soon

     

    Paul A.

    • Like 12
    • Craftsmanship/clever 3
  8. 3 hours ago, Adam said:

    Very nice indeed, but are you sure any of these unfitted tipplers had vac’ through pipes? I have seen no evidence that any BR unfitted tipplers ever did (and BR would have painted them bauxite/freight stock red accordingly), but don’t know about the Lancs Steel vehicles.

     

    Regarding the Lancs steels wagons here is a photograph of them at a later time, hoses removed but vac cylinder still evident:

     

    https://paulbartlett.zenfolio.com/lancswagon/h27b559b4#h536a5440

     

    I'll try to dig out the reference photographs I used for the BR tipplers, these being taken at Skillington Road sidings just before closure in the early 1970's. I'll have to post these via PM as I don't have copyright. 

     

    There's a few freight stock grey wagons in this fitted rake here, one being an early high-bodied example:

    https://www.flickr.com/photos/davidwf2009/5576501643

     

    Another freight stock grey in this rake here:

    https://www.flickr.com/photos/davidwf2009/5537356587/in/album-72157626169910951/

     

    Some of those which were later upgraded with roller bearings etc do not appear to have received a repaint. 

     

    Paul A.

    • Like 2
  9. Hi All, 


    A bit of signage for the layout now. 


    Stanton Ironworks-type exchange sidings sign

     

    326131884_exchangesidingssigncopyright.jpg.6fb77ccb1d94b8ff816bc5645c1f70ae.jpg

    Stanton Ironworks-issued exchange sidings sign at Harston, 1970's

     

    Demarcation between the privately owned lines and the national network was usually marked by a cast iron simple “LNER/BR maintenance ends here” sign on the appropriate sleeper. Despite this, it was occasionally necessary for the BR locomotive to pull forward onto private metals to shunt wagons, effectively using the privately owned running line as a headshunt for the loops of the exchange area. 


    An interesting sign which appears to have been a standard fitting on exchange sidings for systems operated by the Stanton Iron Company was this large board and warning lamp  limiting the movements of BR locos to a particular section, and no further.

     

    132814990_signladdercopyright.jpg.f7668f991b4670992f7978dd6e749819.jpg
    The post was fitted with a lamp to warn loco crew in dreary conditions. 


    The model

     

    645556756_Ironstonerailwaysignstanton.jpg.f752723d3ff923f1cf840a769c93ad52.jpg

     

    The post is a cut-down white metal casting from MSE, as is the lamp. I wanted a fabricated thin ladder and in my search came across this offering from Stenson models with etched sides. This built up very nicely and can be supplied with a simple jig which makes makes things 10x easier on the eyes and finger tips… For rigidity the bottom rung is soldered to a length of wire from the signal post, this will be buried with scatter material/filler.

     

    The typeface itself is an approximation of the original, which I did as an etch filler on another project in nickel silver. 

     

    DSC_0703.JPG.b883fb23e1bed98f92a6d5cb7f448573.JPG

     

    The sign will be located facing the off-scene exchange sidings on the layout which means that it will be almost unreadable by the viewer, never mind! 


    Thanks 
    Paul A. 
     

    • Like 15
    • Agree 1
    • Informative/Useful 1
  10. On 23/04/2020 at 09:16, Wickham Green too said:

    This could be a candidate -

     - though I can find no reference to her being broken up.

     

    This loco hasn't been broken up and is in covered museum accommodation at Cottesmore, photograph taken at Rippingdale prior to arrival in the early 2000's. 

     

    I would highly suspect these have come from cut-up class member AE1945. 

     

    Paul A. 

  11. 14 hours ago, doilum said:

    Minor???!! That's no way to talk about S112. By all accounts she could pull the wheels off an austerity.

    Yes, the 50550 had a greater tractive effort owing to the smaller driving wheels, despite the austerity class actually being heavier. It must be remembered that this design was not a step backwards and the earlier classes had recurring difficulties with their backhead mounted injectors. The austerity class was capable of a greater turn of speed and increased range from the enlarged bunker, something which was a key consideration when it was believed that the majority would handle the first two years of secondary route traffic in post-war Western Europe. 

     

    10 hours ago, alexl102 said:

    describing the earlier classes as 'minor' isn't really accurate; they were the company's main designs and used widely all over the country.

    I'm afraid that is not entirely accurate.

     

    The Hunslet Engine Company had far more success with their excellent 15'' and 16'' inside cylinder designs which were produced in much greater numbers across several decades, the aforementioned 18'' design build numbers totaled 24 locos (8x50550, 16x48150). The use of the 48150 class was confined to steelworks only. The entirety of the 50550 class were originally ordered as trip working quarry railway locos and it was only owing to wartime and economic pressures that the order by Stewarts and LLoyds  was cancelled and the locos dispersed. 

     

    Corbs has had a go at the 48150 class here:

     

    There is also a kit available from Mercian models in 4mm and 7mm. 

     

    Paul A. 

  12. On 09/04/2020 at 10:33, Corbs said:

    With the tipplers, was it similar to collieries in the use of knackered internal user stock from the cutting face to the 'works', and then loaded into BR stock for onward travel, or was it taken straight through?

     

    Hi Corbs, 

     

    Not in the same sense, no. Many systems employed "direct loading" whereby the BR wagons were run up to the quarry face and these same wagons would be worked across the network to the steelworks. Internal user mineral wagons in the ironstone industry were typically purpose-built for the movement of the quarried material and not intended to run on BR metals in revenue-earning service.

     

    Regarding internal user mineral wagons, in the early days wooden-frames side tipping wagons were the norm, often referred to as "ship canal wagons". This later progressed to steel-bodied dump car wagons and skip wagons. The purpose of these designs was to load the crusher (where applicable) or to transfer the ore to an intermediary location for calcining.

     

    I'll cover on-site calcining and associated operations in a later post, but here's an example of an internal user mineral wagon alluded to above:

     

    DSC02354.JPG.83c2043e6fee4c67d80a3ee7dbeb8ebd.JPG

     

    A 3-skip internal user wagon built by G.R. Turner during WW2, preserved at Cottesmore. This example had a hard life being latterly used at Corby Steelworks for restoring landslips and moving bulk chemicals/materials around the plant. Examples of these were seen at several quarries in Northamptonshire including Cranford, Nassington and Pitsford . 

     

    Paul A. 

    • Informative/Useful 4
×
×
  • Create New...