Jump to content
 

rope runner

Members
  • Posts

    1,045
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by rope runner

  1. On 05/04/2020 at 14:46, Sandhole said:

    In the first shot.
    I assume the face-shovel is electric, there is a big cable lying on the floor.
    It's chassis appears to be similar or that of a Ruston steam shovel.
    Did it start as a steam shovel and then was converted to electric, or was it delivered already electric?

     

     

    Hi Sandhole, 

    Yes - electric as were most of excavators of this size, certainly by this period. There are drawings available in the Lincoln's excavators series of books by Peter Robinson. The chassis will have been new-build, the 110RB being a newer model of the already proven 100RB. The example at Corby pictured above has a raised cab which was an optional extra from Ruston Bucyrus. 

     

    On 05/04/2020 at 14:46, clarkea1 said:

    Looks great so far - looking forwards to more of it!

     

    May I ask how you're doing point operation?

     

    Thanks

     

    Alastair

     

    Hi Alastair,

     

    Point operation is via Tortoise motors via DPDT switches, already sorted. 

     

    On 05/04/2020 at 16:43, Regularity said:

    They look quite alive to me...

     

    Yes, quite! Not picked up by spellcheck or obvious reasons. Duly amended.

     

    Wagon inspection platform

     

    One feature which every system appeared to have was a raised platform for inspecting wagon contents. 

     

    2061845256_Wagonplatformcopyright.jpg.3374cca3da4fdb57d33a6f5004d0ff11.jpg

    Wooden inspection platform at Priors Hall, Corby. Late 70's

     

    These varied in height and construction method but were typified by a raised platform above the height of wagons in order for staff to check their contents prior to loading. The aim of this being to remove any foreign objects from empty wagons that may damage the crusher or cause untoward effects in the manufacturing process. More often that not these were located between the weighbridge and the exchange sidings, the above image being an exception to that... 

     

    The Oxfordshire Ironstone Company at Wroxton had a covered version providing some protection from the weather. This was a necessity owing to their high output, the line to the exchange sidings being double tracked accordingly. 

     

    The quarries operated by the Stanton Iron Company North of the river Welland had understandably more basic facilities. As my layout depicts a smaller system, it is from one of these which I take my prototype for modelling: 

     

    gantry.jpg.a6da4996f2bc44272c58387835ef7a88.jpg

    Ex-Woolsthorpe quarries inspection platform preserved at Cottesmore. A near-identical one was at nearby Harlaxton Quarries in South Lincs. 

     

    The model is constructed from brass strip using measurements from the preserved example, however differs in that the angle strip is inside the frame, as per the scrapped example at Harlaxton. The deck is made from etched diamond checker plate from Scale Link with a brass signal ladder to complete. The figure is from the Dart Castings range. 

     

    _20200405_170056.JPG.02b6d1f83002a859405955a282ed03c2.JPG

     

    The base will be weathered to match the surrounding ground clutter when appropriate. 

     

    Paul A. 

    • Like 12
    • Craftsmanship/clever 2
    • Friendly/supportive 1
  2. The latest batch of 14mm driving wheels from Markits have steel tyres, I gather they are slowly being phased in and new batches of all driving wheels (and full sets of pony/driving wheels) will feature steel tyres. 

     

    Paul A. 

  3. My arm could be twisted for one in 00 gauge, definitely.

     

    The crossheads would need to be included though as the ones on the Hattons model look nothing like the typical slender Barclay pattern ones. 

     

    Paul A. 

  4. 23 hours ago, truffy said:

    I think 1800 might be ideal for my village war memorial. Given that my modelling is in 4mm, I'm thinking that 7mm for the statue might be about right.

     

    Thoughts?

     

    Far too big IMO. Most are life-size or a slight size larger. 

     

    Paul A. 

    • Thanks 1
  5. Ex-Round Oak Sentinel type RR 10202/64 (above photograph) is ex-Oxfordshire Ironstone Company BARABEL and now happily preserved on the Nene Valley Railway as yard shunter at Wansford. There's three more from the OIC fleet up the road at Cottesmore in Rutland: RR10201/64 BETTY ,10204/65 JEAN and 10207/65 GRAHAM  - they are frequently in operation on open days.  Also preserved and overhauled is 10165/63 JOAN on the East Somerset.

     

    That's five industrial locos preserved out of an operational fleet of thirteen, which is quite remarkable in itself...

     

    Paul A. 

    • Like 1
    • Informative/Useful 3
  6. I'm hoping the 13 ton hopper has been progressed in a meaningful way since the rendering shown at Warley 2018, the catalogue photograph is of this test model again. It had pretty much been taken this far before Peco took ownership of Parkside, so it would be nice to finally get it over the line. 

     

    Paul A. 

    • Agree 2
  7. 15 pages of conjecture and nobody seems to notice or pass comment on this: There is not one new or newly re-tooled wagon of any kind for 2020

     

    For me that's a huge miss. 

     

    Paul A. 

    • Like 2
    • Agree 8
    • Informative/Useful 1
  8. On 25/10/2019 at 14:05, 1whitemoor said:


    The sleepers you've photographed are ex-Ministry Of Supply obtained from Corby steelworks upon closure. I can't say I've seen these in any colliery images but they were certainly used at cement works and quarries. 

     

    DSC_0448.JPG.0e4c71cca7fd14dbedae581f781285c0.JPG

     

    Paul A. 

     

     

    I've had some of these 3D printed in resin as scenic items for my layout, not sure they would be suitable for use with C&L chairs due to the material. Excuse the poor quality photograph. 

     

    DSC_0483.JPG

    • Like 4
  9. On 05/11/2019 at 18:57, Corbs said:

    Hi Paul,

     

    Please would you be able to tell me the wheel spacing for this loco?

    EDIT - I found the driving wheel diameter for 'Carnarvon' which is 4ft 0in


    Hi Corbs

     

    Wheelbase is 12' with 5'9'' from front to centre and 6'3'' from centre to rear. 

     

    The wheels were definitely 3' 6'' on all the locos whether MW, Kitson or RSH built. 

     

    Kind regards Paul A. 

    • Informative/Useful 1
  10. 1 hour ago, mike morley said:

    Seen at Rocks by Rail, Rutland, a couple of months ago.

     

    P1010608.JPG.ae7cf9c0e0b71089d496ef83e93af1a5.JPG

     

    P1010605.JPG.3142f9590383543586ac87c1a65a33f3.JPG

    The sleepers clearly bear little resemblance to those used on "standard"  track. 

    I've not been there recently, but certainly until not too long ago the Foxfield Railway had what I guess must have been ex-NCB track, which also had comparatively short sleepers with sloped ends and edges.

     

     

     

     


    The plan over the winter as I understand it is to completely re-lay the mainline and cut out the dipped joints where appropriate.

     

    The sleepers you've photographed are ex-Ministry Of Supply obtained from Corby steelworks upon closure. I can't say I've seen these in any colliery images but they were certainly used at cement works and quarries. They are on Ambis Engineering's "to do" list in 4mm scale. 

     

    There are two patterns of these - one for flat bottom rail as you've linked and one for bullhead as shown below:

     

    DSC_0448.JPG.0e4c71cca7fd14dbedae581f781285c0.JPG

     

    Paul A. 

     

     

    • Like 5
  11. The latest Hornby models have the wrong driving wheels as the centre driving wheel should have an offset balance weight. This was correct on the Dapol and earlier Hornby models of the same tooling. You have been warned.. 

     

    Paul A. 

    • Informative/Useful 2
×
×
  • Create New...