Jump to content
 

Mrkirtley800

Members
  • Posts

    1,456
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Mrkirtley800

  1. Very nice too Chris

    No, I have been thinking about abandoning this thread and starting another one.  Many of the pics were taken to illustrate a particular point and which I did not save, so are lost.

    The remainder I really don’t want to spend time on, so perhaps, start again.

     

     

    • Friendly/supportive 4
  2. If you have a source of Johnson 3’4”. chimneys in 4mm, will you please let me know.  All the ones I have found so far have not been the lovely graceful ones that were fitted in Johnson’s time.

    The only exception was the cast white metal ones by K’s, which came with their ‘single’ kit.  I bought a fair few of these before the K’ s stopped making them, but have now run out.

    Good luck with the ‘700’.  I have two Kirtley goods, one a K’s kit bought for me in 1966, the other a Jidenco offering, which required quite a bit of scratch building.

    Derek

    • Like 1
  3. Hello Andy,

         My apologies for the lack of a reply to your  message.  My ipad is still having problems with a blank strip along the top of the page.

    I only saw your message when I used a laptop yesterday.  Unfortunately my cranky knees have stopped my frequent use of the laptop, so the reason for my delay in replying to you.

    The blank strip along the top of the page covers my name as well, so cannot use that to get into my messages.

    regards

    Derek

  4. 3 hours ago, NHY 581 said:

    Good to hear, Al. Unfortunately it's a tad far for Sheep 1 but looking forward to catching up in April. 

     

    Best of luck and steer clear of the EM gauge society and their unseemly practices. 

    unseemly practices??  I have been a member of the EMGS for donkeys years and never knew about this sort of going’s on.  Have I been missing something?  How disappointing.  I think I should ask for my subs to be refunded.

    Good luck with the show Al.  This is one I never used to miss, that is until my joints gave up on me.

    Derek

    • Like 2
    • Agree 1
  5. 1 hour ago, BroadLeaves said:

    It might not officially be a ploughing engine, but I think the chap in the road is saying:

    "'ere in Lit'l Mud'l, we does things our way. Always 'av, always will. Can't be doin' with no changes now, not at my time o' life."

      

       OK, so there is a right way or a wrong way or a Little Muddle way of doing things.

    • Agree 2
    • Funny 1
  6. I think I am a longer in the tooth than most modellers contributing to RMW..

    I joined the EM gauge society in 1966, and the S4 society in the mid seventies, so Ihave a foot in both camps.  However my layout is to EM gauge and works. I do make my own locos and of the 27 Midland and North Eastern, 12 are scratch built, and some of the kit built ones sport scratch built frames, or chassis as some call it.  All my tank locos are compensated as are some of the tender engines, and the latter have pick ups on loco and tender, so building working engines to 18.83mm gauge does not present any visible problems.

    If I were starting again, it would be EM, since it satisfies me.

    When I used to go to shows I saw some superb layouts in both EM and S4.  I also saw some dreadful ones.  So EM, S4, whatever floats your boat, and how comfortable you are modelling in either.

    The thing is do it.

    Derek

     

    • Like 3
  7. On 06/01/2022 at 12:01, Rowsley17D said:

     

    That's a good enough excuse for me to run the one I am building on my layout. Any chance of its number Derek?

    I get all my info from the Essery/Jenkinson books, and the useful photos.

    I am sure Stephen could advise you on a number.

    Derek

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1
  8. During  the  exhibiting  of Kirkby Malham mk1, we were at one show where a guy claimed to know the station at KM very well.  My fellow operator and I were a bit nonplussed, but pleased he thought he had recognised the station.

    Derek

    • Like 7
    • Funny 1
  9. 1 hour ago, Compound2632 said:

     

    Summerson does not say to what use the engines transferred to Skipton and Manningham in 1921/22 were put. No. 789 is Derek's engine, I was just having my little joke.

    Point taken, Stephen.   I have to admit to my shame, that numbers of engines passed me by.  Yes I will use  appropriate numbers when I can find them.

    I was never a train spotter.  All my friends had their books of ‘cops’.

    It left me cold but I would go with them to places but Iwas more interested in the operation and shunting going on, and would sit and watch it for hours while they drooled over getting a particular engine.

    Derek

    • Like 4
    • Friendly/supportive 4
  10. 2 hours ago, Rowsley17D said:

     

    Grassington Branch?

    My first proper EM layout was a 75% copy of Grassington.  I knew the station when in its original track layout.    My friends and I camped nearby for years in our teens.

    It was my ambition to build a layout of Grassington, and in 1965 moved to a house were I could put a floor in the loft and build my dream.

    But it was still quite a distance from Kirkby Malham.

    Derek

    • Like 6
  11. Stephen,  yes I realise my locomotive allocation might be a bit wayward, the 0-4-4WT was mainly London based although there is a photo of one on a train in Derbyshire.

    Kirkby Malham is (or was when I used to pass through) a beautiful village, but did not have a railway.   So why not stretch imagination and use any locomotive that appeals.

    The 0-4-4 WT is a particular favourite, being built way back in 1966, as was my Kirtley goods (the crimson one).

    The information available then was pretty limited, so if we built an out of the way engine, we may not get it right, and that is the case in a few of my efforts at that time.

    Derek

    • Like 5
    • Friendly/supportive 2
×
×
  • Create New...