Well he will have his work cut out for sure. Notwithstanding this, how is it that HS2 has completely lost control of the PR agenda on this, allowing the objectors' lobby to perpetuate the stories that were wrong in the first place, and leaving the media with little option but to run with it because of a lack of counter material from the proponents? OK I know the media will always go with the opposition because it sells more papers, but you know what I mean. I have no problem at all with informed debate and consultation, but that's not what we have had, or ever seem to get with major infrastructure developments which inevitably raise objections, some valid and reasonable and some not.
[rant] Same with fracking (about which I don't have enough objective information to make a decision about which way I go) - no real distribution of hard facts leaving the antis to claim (and keep) the high ground for their own distorted agenda; as if oil wells haven't been drilled through groundwater aquifers for over a century (including in the UK). As for earthquakes I don't recall much hue and cry over the longer term creation of earth tremors due to subsidence in old coal workings. No doubt the minor earthquake off Blackpool a few days ago will be attributed to a delayed action effect of the curtailed fracking trials in Lancashire. Maybe it will turn out to be an uneconomic technology in the UK, but let's make that decision based on science and not prejudice (which means you have to explore and test first). [/rant].