Jump to content
 

Jeff Smith

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    3,753

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Status Updates posted by Jeff Smith

  1. Jeff Smith

    If unavailability of rtr EM points forces you to build C&L points kits you might want to consider P4 which has a better appearance and performance when running through the V.  Wheels do not drop in as they do with OO and EM, which is really just wider OO.

     

    just a thought which I did not want to put on the thread as would inevitability break down to an EM versus P4 argument.  P4 costs about the same as EM......

     

    good luck!

    1. Dungrange

      Dungrange

      But ready to run points do exist, albeit only a B6 produced by Peco for the EM Gauge Society.

    2. Hroth

      Hroth

      Then isn't P4 just a wider EM?  :jester:

       

    3. mike morley

      mike morley

      We've all got things we're good at and things we're not so good at.

      Those who claim P4 is as easy as EM are those who find building pointwork easy.

      I model in EM because 18.2mm pointwork is just (and only just) within my capabilities.  18.83 is beyond my skills.

×
×
  • Create New...