Jump to content
 

mudmagnet

RMweb Gold
  • Posts

    4,458
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    6

Posts posted by mudmagnet

  1. I'm just hoping that MV does not follow the example set by Senna / Prost and decide to risk taking Lewis out at the first corner on Sunday. Let's face it, MV does have 'form' about not knowing when to back out.

     

    I think that it could be likely that MV will need another engine, but will not take it until the last race. Merc have, it appears, played a master stroke by giving LH a 'fresher' engine for the last two races, where engine power is an advantage. The rules, as far as I am aware, allow for three engines before a penalty, but allow the engines to be swapped as required by the team throughout the season. LH effectively has 5 engines at his disposal, having served two penalties. MV only four.

     

    • Agree 2
  2. 1 hour ago, jcredfer said:

     

    I'm not sure that many of those who drink it would notice.   :rolleyes:   :jester:

     

    Those were my thoughts exactly. A different market to the majority of motor sport enthusiasts.

     

    • Like 2
    • Agree 1
  3. The whole issue with stewards making decisions on racing incidents or near misses or crashes is purely subjective as it is humans making decisions. Whether anyone agrees or disagrees is largely irrelevant. Whereas, specific dimensional discrepancies, such as LH wing or cars exceeding track limits etc is quantifiable and therefore relatively simple to measure / penalise.

     

    There are some more incidents where the stewards have given penalties or not as down to racing incidents, they do have a very unenviable job at times. Not helped by the team managers, some worse than others, emailing or otherwise said stewards. 

     

    That said, they do need to appear to follow and enforce the regulations consistently from one race to the next or indeed within one race. My issue is that at times, some drivers are more heavily penalised than others and others are 'allowed' to get away with much more. It is the inconsistencies that lead to lack of confidence in the stewards. The 'incident / near-miss' with MV / LH is a case in point - would they have viewed differently if was two other drivers? Have they reached a point now in the championship knowing that any decision will significantly affect the result? LH DQ was simple - the wing was not to regulation, hence the penalty. A 'racing' incident not so easy.

     

     

    • Like 2
  4. I think that the point Toto wants to make is that how can the stewards decide not to investigate when clearly do not have all the facts. If after investigation, they determine nothing wrong, then fine, but they did not appear to want to investigate.

     

    If it was LH doing the same, then you would never hear the end of it from CH / RB

     

    • Agree 13
  5. 1 minute ago, Hobby said:

    Yes and Horner was quiet as well in the post race interview... ;)

     

     

    I don't think they do, the way DC and the other chap were talking at the end of the race it would seem they expect everyone to run on the same engines for the rest of the season...

    I was thinking from a tactic in order to achieve more engine power. Can push a new engine much harder.

    • Agree 2
  6. If my maths is correct,  then Lewis needs two wins at next two races to get equal points (ignoring fastest lap, as will be either Bottas or Perez picking those up), then final race decider?

     

    Do Merc have another engine change? Clearly a huge pace advantage and not a great deal to lose. Pressure shifted a little to RB / MV now? Now theirs to lose?

    • Agree 5
  7. 23 minutes ago, Andrew P said:

    On refection, yes your right, 2 wrongs don't make a right.

     

    Lets hope they check out WHY BR keep changing their rear wing just before the start of the Race as well now, it happened 3 times.

     

    They might argue that for safety reasons where they are finding cracks, if I recall correctly, didn't they previously had an issue this year?

     

    • Agree 1
    • Interesting/Thought-provoking 1
  8. 8 minutes ago, Oldddudders said:

    So another sneery boast from the team that likes to whinge when others succeed. What nasty people they are. 

     

    The more 'air-time' that CH and Red Bull owners give, the more my opinion of them as 'sportsman-like' diminishes. 

     

    On the plus side, what a great performance by Lewis to rise from P20 to P5 - assisted in part by the other drivers wanting to give him space as wanting to finish the sprint themselves - but hopefully he can do something similar in the race.

     

    A wet / damp race would liven things up a bit as well.

    • Like 4
    • Agree 2
  9. 3 minutes ago, Zomboid said:

    It's not the FIA or the Stewards fault that MB sent an illegal car out in qualifying.

     

    I'm sure this isn't the outcome that they wanted for exactly that reason, but it's black and white whether the car is legal or not.

     

    I can see this both ways, rules are rules and if broken, then you have to pay the consequences. Lewis time was achieved with an 'illegal car' (however minor) and so has his time deleted. No different than exceeding track limit rules.

     

    However, the aero rule changes did seem to favour Red Bull (and others), yet penalise Merc / Aston. Largely, I think, to close the gap between the Merc and those behind. As a consequence, in part at least, has allowed Max / Red Bull to get very close to winning the championship. An additional factor has been the mess that Merc have made on some decisions (both strategy and car development) throughout the year, plus Lewis not driving at his best at times and finally with VB appearing to be 'absent' from races on several occasions, even before his contract not being renewed.

     

     

    • Agree 2
  10. 12 hours ago, 08221 said:

    Bought a selection of items in 4mm scale.

     

    Very prompt service, arrived well packed and I’m really impressed with the quality of the items - look forward to seeing further products in this useful range!

    Many thanks for the positive feedback, very much appreciated.

     

     

    • Like 1
  11. Another pair of wagons having been through the workbench.

     

    This time a pair of Bachmann VGA wagons, both factory weathered when bought second hand. However, I never like factory weathering and these two were more or less dirt all over and not particularly effective to my eye. Therefore, using IPA and a cotton bud, the majority was removed from the side panels in downward motion. Several sweeps were necessary to remove sufficient paint. This also created various streaks. A quick dusting on the roof with the airbrush, followed by some work on the underframe, I'd say that these are finished and much happier with them now.

     

    PA090430.JPG

    PA090431.JPG

    • Like 3
    • Craftsmanship/clever 1
  12. I'm still convinced that 2021 has been a classic year. Certainly very little 'clean' racing between the two leading drivers, which we had in previous years. Max and Lewis are so far ahead of everyone else, given that Bottas and Perez do not seem able to match their respective team mates and assuming that they have very similar cars. There have been a few other great performances from some of the other drivers, but not what I would describe as making a classic season. Sure the rules do not help and Merc seem to be particularly penalised by the rule change (rake of car). The Mercs have not been great at following closely behind other cars for several seasons - how many times has Lewis 'complained' that cannot get close enough in previous seasons. Plus Merc appear to have 'messed-up' their pit strategies more often than not.

     

    Short of a DNF for Max, the championship is his. I cannot see Merc / Lewis being able to overall the point deficit now.

    • Agree 6
×
×
  • Create New...