Jump to content
 

Dixie Dean

Members
  • Posts

    299
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Dixie Dean

  1. image.png.40df7fd1cfcafbdb295716284c0d34ee.png

     

     

    2 hours ago, black and decker boy said:

    Interesting that the artists impression is with a Euro spec cab not a 68/88 cab.

     

    could complicate matters for Dapol

     

    It has been said, possibly in this thread somewhere, that DRS own the rights to the design of the 68/88, so maybe ROG has had to do something different.  Regardless, whilst there are many similarities between a 68 and a 88, there are probably as many difference between both of them and the 93 that will mean the only common parts will be the motor block and wheels, i.e. each of the 88 and 93 would require slightly different bodies and underframe equipment. 

    • Agree 2
  2. Thanks njee20.  I'll have a bit of an experiment in the morning.  Any thoughts on the railings I should use.  The ones in the eBay link a bright yellow as you often see at the end of platforms.  Would they be appropriate or would a different colour be better?

     

    One thing I should point out is that the layout's plan has changed significantly, and is now a main station and freight area on each side of the bottom level of the layout (either side of my garage) with a single track main line climbing around the walls of the garage up to a higher level at eye height with another station and freight area.  There is also a mountain pass which is the sections you can see in the photos above.  There a couple of passing loops with stations as the line progresses upwards.  I'm afraid I'm not particularly bothered about representing a specific line or place, I just want an interesting layout on which to run my modern image stock.   I do have a detailed Anyrail plan but as it is multi level it's quite difficult to present it on screen.

     

    It's sort of based somewhere in Scotland with high mountains-ish!

     

    Regardless I do hope you find it interesting enough to pop back from time to time as it progresses.

  3. Thanks duff man, It is definitely a British layout, but I do like the look of an almost Alpine location!  I must admit I'm not finding it easy to decide which way to do this.  It is quite a gradient, although my locos can handled it with the max length I can go to with 10 bogie wagons.  If I step it it would have quite a few steps.  Unfortunately the uprights on most of the model railings I can find will be quite out of vertical if I just run the top of the wall parallel to the gradient.  I might therefore try a section with steps and see how it goes.

  4. My layout is proceeding apace now.  However I keep having to make sort of "major decisions" which are really quite minor, but tend to hold me up for a day or two each time"

     

    I could do with some assistance to decide how to finish the top of the retaining wall below.   Should I cut the wall to the same angle as the incline, or say 1 or 2 scale feet above and finish it with a single or double handrail, or should it be stepped horizontally up the incline?  Anyone know of any suitable model handrails?   I've found these on eBay - would they be suitable and what would be better, sloping or stepped?  https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/223695225016?chn=ps&norover=1&mkevt=1&mkrid=710-134428-41853-0&mkcid=2&itemid=223695225016&targetid=1000147647540&device=c&mktype=pla&googleloc=9075129&poi=&campaignid=10195651343&mkgroupid=103308028793&rlsatarget=pla-1000147647540&abcId=1145985&merchantid=6995734&gclid=Cj0KCQiA5vb-BRCRARIsAJBKc6LBfY8ovw0i0mZE4qnQuU3CF0hsk16Xouy8wKB0ZYg-1yV_NKv2v7caAiolEALw_wcB

     

    Just to put it all in perspective, in front of it is the track bed for the line which circles the layout.  The track on the incline is the single rack main line climbing around the layout which eventually ends up on the higher boards.  Behind that are the scenery carriers over the hidden loops/sidings which also circle the layout under removable sections of scenery.

     

    Also, what could I do with the scenery here other than the side of a mountain and pine and fir trees etc?

     

    incline_wall.jpg.97ccfd6a788801b822b981e70bd35cc0.jpg

    • Like 1
  5. 10 hours ago, peach james said:

    You can do this using RR&Co, so there _should_ be ways of doing this without using that- if you are using NCE, it may be possible using a mini-panel, _but don't put too much hope on it _.  If you can activate a function, usually F8 is to "mute" a sound equipped loco.  The problem is going to be ID'ing which loco you have where- that's why I know you can do so in RR&Co.  (I do so with a LRC, turning on the sound as it leaves the staging yard).  So, the likely answer is yes, but it will require a fairly extensive automation to do.

     

    James

     

    Please tell me more James.  I'm currently just using an NCE, but when sufficient of my layout is built will move to a laptop and JMRI.  RR & Co is a Windows program?

  6. One thing I've been pondering is the fact that my trains can go into hidden sidings which represent going off somewhere else on BR.  In both directions this effectively means entering a tunnel and being stabled in one of 3 sidings before coming back on to the layout later.  Can anyone think of a way I could automate the sound fading out after it enters the tunnel and fading in when coming back onto the layout?

    • Like 1
  7. Having watched the video of the new model, I do hope that Accurascale manage to address the pantograph head staying horizontal to the catenary at all times.  The way it currently tips to one side isn't great.  The Bachmann class 85 has a similar issue with the pan head incapable of being horizontal until it is quite high. 

     

    The way in real life that the BWHS pantograph actually works is a great piece of British engineering.

  8. 1 minute ago, DBC90024 said:

     

    Sounds similar to my plan of tailored nbrass gantries and PECO single track masts and their wires

     

    it certainly works for me.  I have yet to start a layout thread as I haven't got enough actually finished, but around Christmas I should have reached a point of having enough to start one.  What about you?

  9. I have presumed that the pantograph, although able to rise and fall, will be sprung and will run along the OHLE OK.  The Bachmann pantograph on the Class 90 just runs on or below my catenary as some of it is higher than the amount of rise in the pantograph, which by real values isn't that high.  The real ones will actually go quite high.

    • Like 1
  10. 2 hours ago, adb968008 said:

    Its at the top, 58 votes.

     

    Sorry, I meant the number of locos which would be purchased

     

    Sadly, I think there's little to no chance of me ever running an 88 unless I built it myself.  But there's so many changes you'd have to make to a 68 body and chassis it wouldn't be a quick job.  I did follow a thread by someone else who'd started the trip, but it just went quiet and I suspect he has given up :-(

    • Friendly/supportive 1
  11. I quite like the idea of reaching the end of the catenary and being able to start the diesel engine and do some shunting or head off somewhere.  Would need a MK 5 chip but changing modes would quite appeal to me.

    • Like 2
    • Agree 1
×
×
  • Create New...