Jump to content
 
  • entries
    261
  • comments
    1,413
  • views
    143,458

Paynestown - a valleys terminus in 00


Barry Ten

1,750 views

Just a quick update from me - here are some summery snaps of a "quickie" layout I've been knocking together since Christmas. The idea was to have something other than Cogirep to exhibit this year, and to plunder the scrap box and general leftovers from my old layouts to the fullest extent. For a long while I've also wanted to create a compact, valleys-themed terminus on which 56xxs and panniers can potter about happily, and which gets away from the chocolate box look of so many GWR branch line termini.

 

Having never built a BLT until now, it was also something new for me.

 

Since I had a lot of perfectly good Code 100 Peco left over from the demolition job on Wyvant, when I had to relocate from Holland to the UK, I played around with points and eventually settled on a simple plan which enabled me to shoehorn in the engine shed and some small goods facilities. Obviously Code 75 or handlaid would look better, but I'm not one to get too worked up about these things.

The plan is not very prototypical but I wanted to be use that shed! I also added a carriage shed reminiscent of the one at Porth, using the Ratio kit. It will be painted and weathered to look suitable grotty. The idea is to suggest a terminus at the end of its days, struggling to survive.

 

The boards, which are about 3.5 foot in length, are made from extruded foam and MDF edging, with only a tiny amount of wood in each one to serve as corner reinforcing. Over the last couple of years I have been using foam more and more, and with this layout I wanted to make the leap into the unknown and abandon wood as much as possible. The boards were incredibly light, but by the time scenery had been added, the weight began to build up again. I wouldn't call them particularly light now, but they're not as hefty as if they'd been made conventionally. The downside is that they are probably more vulnerable to damage than timber boards but all that means is taking a little bit of care when moving them.

 

The main scenic element I wished to include was the track being at a higher level than the roads and buildings. This was very easy to achieve with foam. The track is glued and pinned, and point motors are installed. The "control panel" is very small and recessed into the front. The layout is intended to be set fairly low compared to Cogirep, but with a high backscene, and to be operated from a seated position (most of the time).

 

blogentry-6720-127557269369_thumb.jpg

 

blogentry-6720-127557270638_thumb.jpg

 

blogentry-6720-127557272614_thumb.jpg

 

blogentry-6720-127557274906_thumb.jpg

 

blogentry-6720-127557276693_thumb.jpg

 

blogentry-6720-127557278566_thumb.jpg

 

blogentry-6720-127557279991_thumb.jpg

 

Early in the construction:

 

blogentry-6720-127620803428_thumb.jpg

 

 

There is still much to be done but Paynestown will be on show in some form or another

at the Lord and Butler open weekend in Cardiff later this month:

 

http://www.rmweb.co....ition-any-news/

  • Like 3

13 Comments


Recommended Comments

Yes, I know I'm not supposed to say "me too", but er, me too! I like the way the land flows, and the fact that it's not even remotely twee.

 

Foam's great, isn't it!

Link to comment

Simple, interesting and rather attractive Al!

 

Love it. It certainly doesn't look like code 100 in those shots either.

Link to comment

That is a very nice bit of layout building there! The close ups of the street and engine shed look really good.

 

Looking forward to seeing more of this

 

J

Link to comment
  • RMweb Gold

Thanks, all - I'll post more pics as it develops. The shed, in case anyone's interested, is based on the one at Princetown, dimensionally at least - I adapted it from the plans in one of Paul Karau's books.

 

Andy: I think the noonday sunlight helped a bit there, with the track - althiough I like to ballast fairly deep and not over-emphasize the rail profile by painting the sides lurid orange.

Link to comment

Al

.

Very impressed - smacks of 'Dowlais Central' to me .............. went to Dowlais once, "it was closed !"

.

See you at L & B

.

Brian R

Link to comment
  • RMweb Gold

Al, those two levels work very well I think! Visually the design is quite ingenious if you ask me, very inspirational! smile.gif.

 

Oh, and agree totally about avoiding the lurid orange, I think a lot of the Code 100 visual issues has to do with that!

Link to comment

Obviously I don't visit blogs often enough as I haven't seen this before. I just love the different levels, the undulating road and the layouts overall compactness!

Link to comment
  • RMweb Gold

Chris: yes, Maerdy indeed (John B - I think I mistakenly said it was Porth in an email). I think the Maerdy one is faced in corrugated iron rather than wood, though, at least in the BR-era pics I've seen.

Link to comment

Still like this layout....

I think it deserves further outings Mr Ten ;)

 

I'd completely forgotten about it being code 100 rail too

  • Like 1
Link to comment
  • RMweb Gold

I must get it out of the shed and give it a dust-off and test-run one of these days. I'd love to have room to set it up permanently but it needs 11 feet along one wall, and I haven't got that.

 

Not to "big up" my own tracklaying and ballasting, but the Code 100 stuff did come out better than I'd hoped, and there's a lot to be said for it in terms of reliability.

  • Like 1
Link to comment

Having just seen this mentioned in Gordons' "Newbies" thread,

I just thought I'd say, this layout still appeals to me....

 

Having not seen it for a while, and re-visiting those early pics

I look at them and think you've achieved a lot in quite a small area

 

What struck me is how the layout looks so uncluttered,

even though it is in a constrained place, which looks so SW Valleys

I just love the contours and levels of the road in the foreground,

and the hill shapes in the background

perhaps your painting classes have paid off in this hobby too?

 

Though the buildings are kits, they look perfectly "at home"

sat on the layout, and they don't look as if they have been re-used from another layout

(which I know they have - I've got a copy of the article)

 

Hope you get to exhibit it again sir.....

 

Cheers

Marc

  • Like 1
Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...