Ian Smith Posted December 15, 2018 Share Posted December 15, 2018 It is somewhat unfortunate that some people feel the need to offer their unfair/unfounded criticism. My own view is that almost without exception those that do have never produced anything that compares at all favourably to what they are criticising. Anyone who has produced something comparable or better invariably offers constructive criticism because they appreciate the amount of work and skill involved. Ian Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold Regularity Posted December 15, 2018 RMweb Gold Share Posted December 15, 2018 His own work must be really something else, then! What’s his name? Fabergé? Regularity, I wouldn't name names.Don’t worry Mike, I wasn’t asking you to: read it as “Is his name Fabergé?” Or even, “What’s his name - Fabergé?” Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium airnimal Posted December 16, 2018 Author RMweb Premium Share Posted December 16, 2018 Regularity, thanks for the post, it made me laugh. Mike Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold Regularity Posted December 16, 2018 RMweb Gold Share Posted December 16, 2018 Regularity, thanks for the post, it made me laugh. Mike The least I could do.And according to several school reports, I rarely did more than the least I could do. 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ruston Posted December 16, 2018 Share Posted December 16, 2018 Regularity, I wouldn't name names. I am mad at myself for being dragged into a spat in the first place. I feel as if I have let myself down for letting silly words get to me from someone who is of no consequence but feels a giant behind a keyboard. Ruston, thank you for kind words. The van was made using drawing No 479 from Vol 2 L&Y wagons page 198 . I am not sure how long they kept this single shoe and I don't think anybody else will either. Having been building wagons for over 35years my parts box has run riot, so like my loco bits that I pruned back earler this year I may go down the same root with some of these. I also have lots of plastic moulded parts from various companies. Thanks. I only have Vol.1 but now I know about the simple brake gear, and I can get a copy of Vol.2, I may have a go at building one for myself but in 4mm. People who criticise but have no modelling to show for themselves are just dead wood, IMHO, of course. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Poor Old Bruce Posted December 16, 2018 Share Posted December 16, 2018 Thanks. I only have Vol.1 but now I know about the simple brake gear, and I can get a copy of Vol.2, I may have a go at building one for myself but in 4mm. If you want a quick L&Y van in 4mm, try using the ancient Pyramid/Rovex/Tri-ang van body with a decent underframe - but you probably know that already. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
relaxinghobby Posted December 19, 2018 Share Posted December 19, 2018 On the very nicely modelled LYR van 30397 in post #730. Why did they paint the numbers on the ends it must have been difficult to see there ? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MarcD Posted December 19, 2018 Share Posted December 19, 2018 That's not an uncommon practice for pre-grouping railway practice the GWR, Furness, LYR, S&DJR all did it and probably more than that. As for why they did it that is probably lost in the mists of time. Marc Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wagonman Posted December 19, 2018 Share Posted December 19, 2018 That's not an uncommon practice for pre-grouping railway practice the GWR, Furness, LYR, S&DJR all did it and probably more than that. As for why they did it that is probably lost in the mists of time. Marc I can see how it might be of use to shunters... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ruston Posted December 19, 2018 Share Posted December 19, 2018 If you want a quick L&Y van in 4mm, try using the ancient Pyramid/Rovex/Tri-ang van body with a decent underframe - but you probably know that already. I didn't know that. I have typed Pyramid Rovex Triang OO van into google images but that brings up just about anything OO. Do you have any photos of the vans to which you refer? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium airnimal Posted December 19, 2018 Author RMweb Premium Share Posted December 19, 2018 The LNWR also painted the numbers on the ends of its vans and most of it's other wagons as well. I am just surprised I managed to get the numbers straight. I have not being doing a lot lately although I have put some of my photo's on the UK prototype discussion page around Stockport. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Poor Old Bruce Posted December 19, 2018 Share Posted December 19, 2018 I didn't know that. I have typed Pyramid Rovex Triang OO van into google images but that brings up just about anything OO. Do you have any photos of the vans to which you refer? Not off hand. I was hoping to refer you to a page on Nile's bodging thread but can't find one at the mo. I will have to get back to you. PM me if you would you like it posting somewhere else to save upsetting these nice 7mm people any more than necessary. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Caley Jim Posted December 19, 2018 Share Posted December 19, 2018 The LNWR also painted the numbers on the ends of its vans and most of it's other wagons as well. According to Mike Williams' book on CR wagons the LNWR started the practice in 1882. He quotes from LNWR Liveries a minute of August of that year requiring the number to be painted on the ends of wagons in the same manner as on the Caledonian Railway. Jim Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wagonman Posted December 19, 2018 Share Posted December 19, 2018 (edited) According to Mike Williams' book on CR wagons the LNWR started the practice in 1882. He quotes from LNWR Liveries a minute of August of that year requiring the number to be painted on the ends of wagons in the same manner as on the Caledonian Railway. Jim But no indication of the reasoning behind the decision? Edited December 19, 2018 by wagonman Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium Compound2632 Posted December 20, 2018 RMweb Premium Share Posted December 20, 2018 But no indication of the reasoning behind the decision? That's the frustrating thing about the minute books I've looked at (Midland Railway various committees held at Kew) - they are records of decisions, not of the decision-making process. LNWR Liveries says exactly what Jim says Mike Williams says it says. 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium Andy Hayter Posted December 20, 2018 RMweb Premium Share Posted December 20, 2018 (edited) Some thoughts on painting wagon numbers on the ends - and please do not consider these as definitive proven facts. 1. Vans - the use of vans was comparatively rare compared to say BR days. Picking out a van and its number when the end was painted would therefore be an asset for those working in a goods yard and relatively easy to do. 2. Opens - appart from mineral wagons, opens were used for all sorts of merchandise and to protect that merchandise, wagon sheets were often used. This sheeting could often obscure part of the wagon number, so maybe painting the number in extra places around the wagon would make it easier to identify it, rather than having to unsheet part of the wagon to gain access to the number. Edit to add that this probably explains why some railways relied solely on a plate affixed to the solebar. Edited December 20, 2018 by Andy Hayter Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Caley Jim Posted December 20, 2018 Share Posted December 20, 2018 That's the frustrating thing about the minute books I've looked at (Midland Railway various committees held at Kew) - they are records of decisions, not of the decision-making process. And that's how any minutes should be, with no record of the discussion that led to the decision. Jim Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold Regularity Posted December 20, 2018 RMweb Gold Share Posted December 20, 2018 And that's how any minutes should be, with no record of the discussion that led to the decision. Jim You obviously haven’t had to deal with the financial services regulators recently then! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Poor Old Bruce Posted December 20, 2018 Share Posted December 20, 2018 If you want a quick L&Y van in 4mm, try using the ancient Pyramid/Rovex/Tri-ang van body with a decent underframe - but you probably know that already. I didn't know that. I have typed Pyramid Rovex Triang OO van into google images but that brings up just about anything OO. Do you have any photos of the vans to which you refer? Not off hand. I was hoping to refer you to a page on Nile's bodging thread but can't find one at the mo. I will have to get back to you. PM me if you would you like it posting somewhere else to save upsetting these nice 7mm people any more than necessary. Animal says he is OK with me posting on here so here we go (7mm guys go to next post if you wish ). The Trackmaster (By Pyramid) van goes back to at least 1952. It came in all sorts of colours and liveries. Ramsay's catalogue describes it as GWR but I think the general consensus is that it is not a million miles away from a Lancashire and Yorkshire Diagram 3 6-Ton Covered Goods Wagon, some of which had roof hatches. The model has gone through several chassis in its time. The NE one shown has the original but I am not quite sire how to change the wheels as they are apparently three-rail compatible and very similar to Hornby Dublo profile. The white one has Tri-ang open axleboxes and the green one closed axleboxes. The roofs of earlier models are very prone to warping as, indeed, are some of the bodies depending on the plastic used. The second pic shows some underframe detail which could be improved buy adding a hand brake lever and changing the wheels - Might have to go for inside bearing thingies for that. The third pic shows mine fitted with a Dapol chassis I picked up at a swapmeet, I think it is that intended for the rectangular tank wagon. Now I have dug it out for the photo, it looks like I will have to add some transfers to it! Hope this is of interest. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
meil Posted December 20, 2018 Share Posted December 20, 2018 Great work. Glad to read that your fallible like us mere mortals! You mean not knowing the difference between your and you're for instance? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doncaster Posted December 20, 2018 Share Posted December 20, 2018 You mean not knowing the difference between your and you're for instance? My post is now so old the text has corrupted with time. The English was perfect when I first posted. Vernon. ....... with tongue firmly in cheek☺ Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Bigbee Line Posted December 20, 2018 Share Posted December 20, 2018 Regularity, I wouldn't name names. I am mad at myself for being dragged into a spat in the first place. I feel as if I have let myself down for letting silly words get to me from someone who is of no consequence but feels a giant behind a keyboard. Ruston, thank you for kind words. The van was made using drawing No 479 from Vol 2 L&Y wagons page 198 . I am not sure how long they kept this single shoe and I don't think anybody else will either. Having been building wagons for over 35years my parts box has run riot, so like my loco bits that I pruned back earler this year I may go down the same root with some of these. I also have lots of plastic moulded parts from various companies. ....and I bet you still can't find the part that you need..... My parts always seem to know when they will be needed and then they hide....... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium airnimal Posted December 21, 2018 Author RMweb Premium Share Posted December 21, 2018 I know I have not finished the loco coal wagons but I have decided to build 3 ballast wagons to go with the ballast brake van. In Vol 3 of LNWR wagons there is a drawing of a small example only 13 feet long with straight buffers. So I started on a couple and made the headstock of another longer one at the same time. I am not sure if I want a longer one but I like the variety of different wagons in a train. I have left the headstocks over long on the small pair to trim back to size. I have used Peco GWR buffers which are perfect for these wagons. I will cut of the coach bolts and replace with hex bolts from MasterClub. 10 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium airnimal Posted December 23, 2018 Author RMweb Premium Share Posted December 23, 2018 I have decided to go with a longer third ballast wagon with the original headstock. I don't think I will do a lot more because of family visits for the next few days. At least when I get going on the body work I will be able to cut out the lot in one go, that's the theory anyway. 7 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium airnimal Posted December 24, 2018 Author RMweb Premium Share Posted December 24, 2018 I managed to get a couple of hours in the workshop when all the family went to my youngest daughters. I made the side and ends for the two smallest wagons and a new jig for the end pillars. This is an improvement over the last jig because this has a hole drilled in to locate in the buffer beam slot. I cut the end pillars to size and rounded the ends with a file. I held them together in a small vice so they would all be the same size. 7 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now