Jump to content
 

Couplings (and uncoupling) in N gauge: Advice Sought


Recommended Posts

I have just started constructing a small modern image N gauge layout, details here: Mercia Wagon Repair  . As a life-long OO modeller I know what's what in 4mm pretty well. However I'm a bit of a blank sheet of paper when it comes to N

 

This will be a shunting layout. I am faintly aware that the standard N gauge "Rapido" coupling is not regarded as great for shunting, as well as being big and unsightly

 

Dapol offer an Easifit magnetic knuckle coupling as a replacement . All the locos and almost all the wagons have NEM pockets, so this seems a viable option. In 4mm I use Kadees and Sprat and Winkles. I'm aware there is an N gauge Kadee.

 

The Dapol coupllings are described as magnetic. I have some spare Sprat and Winkle uncoupling magnets - are these any use with Dapol couplers or is something quite different required? If so , what and where are they sourced?

 

I am likely to lay the first track shortly, so would like to know what I can /can't incorporate by way of magnets under the track.

 

Grateful for your comments/assistance

Edited by Ravenser
Flagging that I need advicxe
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Ravenser changed the title to Couplings (and uncoupling) in N gauge: Advice Sought
  • RMweb Gold

Personally I've found that Dapol couplings won't fit in Farish NEM pockets. Since others have fitted them, some modification would seem to be required but I don't know what.

 

The "N gauge Kadee" is Microtrains. They aren't compatible with NEM pockets.

 

I believe Dapol produce the necessary magnets. Dapol couplings can also be uncoupled manually using the Rix Products tool intended for Microtrains couplers. N Scale American Trains of Harrow sell these (or did).

  • Informative/Useful 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, D9020 Nimbus said:

Personally I've found that Dapol couplings won't fit in Farish NEM pockets. Since others have fitted them, some modification would seem to be required but I don't know what.

 

The "N gauge Kadee" is Microtrains. They aren't compatible with NEM pockets.

 

I believe Dapol produce the necessary magnets. Dapol couplings can also be uncoupled manually using the Rix Products tool intended for Microtrains couplers. N Scale American Trains of Harrow sell these (or did).

 

Thanks for this

 

May I ask which Farish items you tried them with? The key models for me will be a Farish 04 and 57 - otherwise most of my small current collection  of models are Dapo.  (The VBA and VGA will need to have the current mounts removed and Dapol NEM pockets fitted - it doesn't look an especially challenging job)

 

As Microtrains appear to be relatively difficult to source in Britain, and will be difficult to fit, I think I can now eliminate them.

 

Some positive news on the magnet front. As the Boxfile has several buried Sprat and Winkle magnets (which see little use) and as I use Kadee fitted stock on Blacklade I tried the obvious experiment... The Kadees do indeed open and seperate over the Sprat and Winkle magnet. The S+W magnets are too small to be sensible for use in 4mm, but should be ok for N  (I am hoping to lay a little track this weekend and that would include one obvious location for an uncoupler. Hence my interest in what I can use from my stockbox without waiting for mail order )

Link to post
Share on other sites

The chaps who did Barton Road used 3mm x 3mm rare earth magnets which they swear by.

 

I ordered some last week from Amazon but they have gone missing in the delivery process otherwise I could have given you my own feedback on their application.  I expect the package is stuck to the side of a delivery van somewhere 😄

 

I’ve also a load of Dapol Easi shunts to fit to my Farish coaches and locos inc an 04.

  • Funny 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium

The big problem with Dapol/Farish NEM pockets is purely a size discrepancy. Farish pockets are slightly smaller than Dapol ones (although they've standardised them a bit more on recent releases). As such a Dapol coupling is a very tight fit in a Farish NEM pocket - basically it'll distort the pocket rather than actually 'locating' as per the design. Conversely a Farish coupling in a Dapol pocket can be quite baggy, but obviously less of an issue.


A couple of sweeps of a file on a Dapol coupling will make it fit better, the 'pips' on the side are the primary culprit.


They're probably the best option (or at least the most common) coupling for N gauge shunting with UK stock (ie where you have NEM pockets). MicroTrains are good, the Z-scale ones are more compact too, but as said they don't do a NEM version.

  • Agree 1
  • Informative/Useful 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I bought a number of the Dapol knuckle couplers as they seemed to be similar to Microtrains but with NEM pocket fittings. However I discovered that the NEM standard height is not the same as Microtrains (presumably NMRA) standard height. I wanted to run some wagons with Microtrains Archbar trucks intermixed with European two axle wagons converted with Dapol knuckles. Some Fleischmann/Old Roco wagons not fitted with NEM pockets could fit Microtrains conversion kits to create 'adapter' wagons (Rapido/NEM at one end and Microtrains at the other) but that isn't very flexible for freight train operations! I find Microtrains knuckle kits very fiddly with the tiny springs flying everywhere except where the should go!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...