Jump to content
 

Sandside (FR) - an exercise in modelling rather complex buildings


Jason T
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Jason T said:

None of the Slaters embossed sheets are anything like; their Random Stone is so random, I find it hard to believe that anyone in real life would use such an odd collection of stones to build anything but crazy paving.

Jason,

 

Have you considered downloading a suitable texture from t'internet, and then using it to 'trace / score' onto your building walls? Yes, you'd have to print it out at the correct scale (opportunity to re-size as you need?) and then 'lightly' glue to the wall while tracing, but it would save you having to create / invent the stonework yourself.

 

There's a reasonable selection at https://www.textures.com/search?q=stone, but there are plenty of other sites. Many of these are based on photos of real buildings and so are as 'random' as the real thing.

 

Ian

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium

Thanks, interesting website (the globes threw me a bit).

 

 I am kind of resigned to scribing, or at least giving it a go. I took a trip down to visit the Barrowmore MRG today (their club rooms are close to here and I am keen to get involved: their best known layout is the epic P4 ‘Mostyn’) and took a look at a couple of the buildings that they have scribed; a lot of effort but if done right then it will capture the stonework right.


Time will tell if I can manage it but I have been practicing again, this time with Plastikard and the outline of the signalbox.

037144BF-C7AD-4957-8086-2BD0FAE87421.jpeg

  • Like 6
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium
1 hour ago, Jason T said:

Thanks, interesting website (the globes threw me a bit).

 

 I am kind of resigned to scribing, or at least giving it a go. I took a trip down to visit the Barrowmore MRG today (their club rooms are close to here and I am keen to get involved: their best known layout is the epic P4 ‘Mostyn’) and took a look at a couple of the buildings that they have scribed; a lot of effort but if done right then it will capture the stonework right.


Time will tell if I can manage it but I have been practicing again, this time with Plastikard and the outline of the signalbox.

037144BF-C7AD-4957-8086-2BD0FAE87421.jpeg

 

Oh dear, scribing plasticard... Wouldn't catch me doing that:

post-6675-0-18375300-1439393470.jpg.ae85dc83db0cc8a61040dc8ec189aaff.jpg

 

IMG_20211114_155610.jpg.7cb1c7a376a6ee25ad1e6296d2d8bf9b.jpg

(Ignore the Mr Blobby paint job, early days on the road to a finished job).

 

Like you I was frustrated by not finding a suitable commercially available stone finish, so had to resort to doing it the hard way. On the plus side, nobody canook at the stonework and think it's Slaters or Wills etc.

  • Like 9
  • Thanks 1
  • Craftsmanship/clever 5
Link to post
Share on other sites

That reminds me of the style of architecture local to where I grew up which I always thought would be a nightmare to model except by scribing. If you'd never seen the real thing, you might think that it was made up if presented with it in model form.

 

woodhouse-2-1100x1004.jpg.f811a0540149623d79f1bde6488f0a69.jpg

 

e1a178fa-f530-4e5c-8c8a-b8b0ba1feb23.jpg.2962f1746e71c8bd7b03ca186a9d4d85.jpg

  • Like 10
Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Jason T said:

Thanks, interesting website (the globes threw me a bit)

Jason,

 

Yes I know. It used to be just flat rectangles that where much easier to understand. I think the globes were used 'just because we can', not because it was any better. I thought you might find https://www.textures.com/download/BrickOldMixedSize0056/66095 a fairly close representation?

 

Ian

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium

Last time I exhibited The Mill, Hornby hadn't produced either the Ruston 48 or 88DS. I know that next time it goes out, I will be asked many times if the Judith Edge kits I lost blood sweat and tears over are the Hornby models and each time, I will die a little inside...

  • Friendly/supportive 7
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium

Oh dear, I made a mistake. I spotted, on eBay, a product that looked hopeful; embossed paper that may have been suitable for the station building if painted. The photo representing it was a 2” by 2” square. Interest piqued, I paid £16 and eagerly awaited delivery.

 

It arrived this evening, all the way from Greece.

 

It does look like the image on eBay; exactly like it, in that it’s a series of identical 2” squares filled ten A4 sheets.

 

Ah, but is it embossed, you may well be wondering.

 

Yes it is. On wallpaper.

You can laugh; I did.

 

A0775CAB-1FA3-4C9D-A049-F725C3633B31.jpeg

F641D7F6-7BA6-4894-9CB3-7DDBEA4E657F.jpeg

  • Funny 2
  • Friendly/supportive 7
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium
Just now, MrWolf said:

I think that we all know what the word is you're looking for here...

 

The question being: Is it strong enough? 

 

Or do we need to resort to combinations of two or even three expletives?

It would be hilarious if it wasn’t so tragic 😀 

  • Agree 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Jason T said:

It would be hilarious if it wasn’t so tragic 😀 

 

Quite.

 

It takes me back to my teens and visiting the home of a girlfriend's parents. There was a wall that looked like handmade bricks, colour, texture and everything. That too was wallpaper. I'd never seen anything like it.

I couldn't decide if it was really clever or really naff.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium
12 hours ago, Jason T said:

Oh dear, I made a mistake. I spotted, on eBay, a product that looked hopeful; embossed paper that may have been suitable for the station building if painted. The photo representing it was a 2” by 2” square. Interest piqued, I paid £16 and eagerly awaited delivery.

 

It arrived this evening, all the way from Greece.

 

It does look like the image on eBay; exactly like it, in that it’s a series of identical 2” squares filled ten A4 sheets.

 

Ah, but is it embossed, you may well be wondering.

 

Yes it is. On wallpaper.

You can laugh; I did.

 

A0775CAB-1FA3-4C9D-A049-F725C3633B31.jpeg

F641D7F6-7BA6-4894-9CB3-7DDBEA4E657F.jpeg

I think you should cut out the individual stone blocks and build your own wall...

  • Like 1
  • Informative/Useful 1
  • Funny 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium
1 hour ago, 2ManySpams said:

I think you should cut out the individual stone blocks and build your own wall...

Could be more hassle than it’s worth; it really is a shoddy product (a shoduct?)

  • Friendly/supportive 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold
16 minutes ago, 2ManySpams said:

You seen this stuff Jason, not used it myself but looks interesting? Price is steep though...

 

rps20230203_203248.jpg.186001281fc507f11908de5ed56d78a8.jpg

 

 

Not bad pricewise until you consider how many 6 inch pieces you will need, especially if building a retaining wall or such like.

 

Mike.

  • Like 1
  • Agree 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • RMweb Premium

Whilst I may have been quiet on here, I have been busy in the real world and my experiment scribing plain Plastikard has led to more hours than I would care to admit, a few pieces thrown in the bin when better photos have been found (the drawing in the book is more of a representation with some glaring errors), a sore finger from scribing and some real head scratching. What looks like a simple signalbox is anything but…

 

First, a reminder of the real building

 

5BD8FED7-7C21-43A7-ABFD-879269157CC3.jpeg

  • Like 9
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium

A bit more progress on the signalbox. 
the windows are now in although I need to add the sashes (or whatever the horizontal equivalents are called); door needs a bit of work too by the looks of it.

 

The next challenge is the roof. As can be seen in the above photo of the actual box, the timbers are rather prominent so I spent quite some time scratching my head on how to achieve the look. As can be seen, the (removable) roof has a main hipped structure upon which the ‘timbers’ have been attached. Next, I need to determine the optimal length of them, add the gutters (I have ideas on how to do that) and then add an additional skin upon which the slates will go.

 

 I’m going to change the name of the thread too as it’s probably becoming quite obvious that the scope has crept from making a model of the station building to…. who knows what!

 

6550385A-C86A-46F5-8490-975F9AAB1B7E.jpeg

DCE48665-51E6-48D4-984B-BF7BA5184B64.jpeg

4E6F05C6-A77A-4718-8455-0F99B08AEE06.jpeg

  • Like 15
  • Craftsmanship/clever 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Jason T changed the title to Sandside (FR) - an exercise in modelling rather complex buildings
  • RMweb Premium

Hi Jason,

One method of creating half decent stonework is one Allen Downs used, that is to take the Wills course stone sheets and sand the surface. When I tried it, I found it needed going over with a brass brush which removes all the mess. Although like me I guess that you have moved on from trying to make larger structures from those small, tough sheets. I'll use anything to hand these days which is usually JTT plastic sheets. (Cos it's half the price of Plastruct). Failing that I'm building a foam cutter and am getting into the wargaming method of carving the stones onto the foam and coating it in gesso. Better foam gives better results and it's quite addicting.

 

Grand bit of modeling.

Regards Shaun.

Edited by Sasquatch
Bit more waffle.
  • Like 5
Link to post
Share on other sites

On 03/02/2023 at 20:45, 2ManySpams said:

You seen this stuff Jason, not used it myself but looks interesting? Price is steep though...

 

rps20230203_203248.jpg.186001281fc507f11908de5ed56d78a8.jpg

 

I got one of these a while ago as I needed a long strip of irregular stonework to go along a riverbank, it's not bad and at least you do not get a straight line at the joint of the two parts, can't remember where I ordered from, price wise it was neither cheap nore excessive 

 

  • Like 1
  • Informative/Useful 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium

Two steps forward, ten steps back.

When the roof was added, it became evident that the dimensions of the windows were off (taken from the now obviously dubious drawings in the book referenced above). I tried to remove the window units from the original base but it didn’t go well at all, meaning that all I had left was the roof (built removable).

 

So, I set to work scribing again and creating a new base (a blessing in disguise as I think the stone scribing looks better than attempt one; more uniform). The windows were obviously reconstructed but this time I planned in the sliding opening ones, one modelled so).

 

 I have also slated the roof and in lieu of having any finials, bodged some up as placeholders. Gutters were made by using 40 thou Plastikard, a skrawker, files and swearing. They’re hardly noticeable but they are there, honest.

 

I know that on a monitor it probably looks scruffy (the cruelty of photos) but in reality, it’s better looking with a few areas to tidy up but nothing serious.

 

Bit more to do with the roof (obviously), add interior and then commit to painting it.

 

As wrong as it may seem, the chimney pot really was a mess, probably worse than depicted!!

 

 

4CADB27B-81F9-4FCB-889B-FB55895FBEF9.jpeg

754BC9C0-F962-41EE-9934-995DCDF02A80.jpeg

008D309C-3E1E-4684-B8EB-B532CB67527A.jpeg

CAE13633-E1F7-4837-AB96-B0C1F4E4330A.jpeg

F6E41DBA-A9DE-4213-B962-B43107098E77.jpeg

  • Like 8
  • Craftsmanship/clever 7
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium

In other news, I recently picked up a couple of Dapol (ex Airfix) 16 ton mineral wagon kits; a bit crude but with a bit of work, scrub up ok.

 

 I say bit, but in reality, I have spent quite a lot of time fettling it, with more to do.

 

The first obvious thing to do was get rid of the ridiculous hinges that allow the door to open (followed much later by spending way too much time adding non-working hinges back on).

 I kept the brake rigging from the kit (one side only as per the prototype) and drilled out them, the vee hangers and some spare Parkside levers so I could add the operating rod. The rigging was thinned as much as I dared and staples added for the safety loops.

 

As (at the time) I wasn’t overly enamoured with the kit, I decided to remove the top doors to add a bit of variety to my (overly large) collection of 16 tonners.

 

Other things done were to add Lanarkshire buffers and out of sight but wholly necessary, fit brass bearings and EM Gibson wheels.

 

Worth all the effort? I enjoyed doing it so definitely!

 

 

F6F4E762-AEA1-4B18-AEE8-CFE96695AF3C.jpeg

97A2BCA8-6B3A-4988-9388-E4C1C9507A44.jpeg

  • Like 6
  • Craftsmanship/clever 2
  • Round of applause 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...