RMweb Premium PeterStiles Posted March 7 RMweb Premium Share Posted March 7 6 hours ago, Mike Buckner said: They even left in the same manufacturer ID I remember 'O' level Computer Studies. One boy copied another boy's Project verbatim including a (c) notice the original author included... This is on that level of stupidity. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Butler Henderson Posted March 8 Share Posted March 8 And unless something is very weird with Dapols instructions given they quote Lais decioder numbers the Dapol decoders are reabdged Lais ones, Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GrumpyPenguin Posted March 9 Share Posted March 9 On 07/03/2024 at 12:14, melmerby said: Would you consider it OK for someone to bring out an identical in every respect copy of an Apple Mac? or a Tesla 3? Personally it would not bother me as I would never buy either.😁 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dave75 Posted March 9 Share Posted March 9 Doesn't seem to bother the car people either does it . Cars are like pizzas , chassis is the same, just pick your topping, vw, skodia, seat, audi . Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
YT-1300 Posted March 9 Share Posted March 9 10 minutes ago, dave75 said: Doesn't seem to bother the car people either does it . Cars are like pizzas , chassis is the same, just pick your topping, vw, skodia, seat, audi . Those four are all part of the same company, not the same as cloning another manufacturers product Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold RFS Posted March 9 RMweb Gold Share Posted March 9 18 hours ago, Butler Henderson said: And unless something is very weird with Dapols instructions given they quote Lais decoder numbers the Dapol decoders are rebadged Lais ones. Lais not only produce decoders with their own label, I believe they also are contracted by others to provide decoders. For example, Hatton's, Gaugemaster, Dapol, DCC Concepts etc Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GrumpyPenguin Posted March 9 Share Posted March 9 2 hours ago, dave75 said: Doesn't seem to bother the car people either does it . Cars are like pizzas , chassis is the same, just pick your topping, vw, skodia, seat, audi . As someone else said they are all part of the same group. However, MB & VW corroborate with the Sprinter/Crafter sharing a lot of the parts & they are effectivly rivals. Vauxhall, Opel, Renault, Nissen & Fiat do the same with their "transit-sized" vans. Many companies share engines & other parts. All this is done by mutual agreement - cloning knock-off decoders is not the same at all. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NotofthiscenturyTim Posted March 9 Author Share Posted March 9 5 hours ago, chiefpenguin said: As someone else said they are all part of the same group. However, MB & VW corroborate with the Sprinter/Crafter sharing a lot of the parts & they are effectivly rivals. Vauxhall, Opel, Renault, Nissen & Fiat do the same with their "transit-sized" vans. Many companies share engines & other parts. All this is done by mutual agreement - cloning knock-off decoders is not the same at all. Cloning a decoder may be legal or illegal. It all depends on what Intellectual Property is involved, how it has been protected and whether it is still valid. If the decoder design is 20 years old or more, any patents will have expired. The first NMRA DCC standard was published over 30 years ago which makes patent infringement issues rather unlikely for a basic motor/function loco decoder. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now