Jump to content
Users will currently see a stripped down version of the site until an advertising issue is fixed. If you are seeing any suspect adverts please go to the bottom of the page and click on Themes and select IPS Default. ×
RMweb
 

Dave F's photos - ongoing - more added each day


Recommended Posts

29 minutes ago, DaveF said:

Replacement photos for Lolham today, on the ECML to the north of Peterborough.  one is from February 1972, the others from July of the same year.

 

 

1094047278_Lolhamgreen47downHulexpressFeb72C839.jpg.0e8430f9a05b15c811aefea17a7f1d89.jpg

Lolham green 47 down Hull  express Feb72 C839

 

 

2094228861_LolhamClass471875dowenexpassJuly72C1005.jpg.a7a2f5705eedc55a763d2677a5d6cf5d.jpg

Lolham Class 47 1875 down ex pass July 72 C1005

 

 

837264094_LolhamClass47upemptycarcarriersJuly72C1006.jpg.6524336d40f1f8019325216e3350ca51.jpg

Lolham Class 47 up empty car carriers July 72 C1006

 

 

1767469754_cLolhamDeltic9006TheFifeandForfarYeomanryupexpassJuly72C1007.jpg.68a076eeef66d14be3e41298e6fbf4a6.jpg

Lolham Deltic 9006 The Fife and Forfar Yeomanry up ex pass July72 C1007

 

 

1716601548_LolhamClass255280downparcelsJuly72C1008.jpg.660063b476adc4f4c125e1ba2df36100.jpg

Lolham Class 25 5280 down parcels July 72 C1008

 

 

David

 

 

Nice range of workings there with passenger, parcels and freight; Mk2 and Mk1 coaches.

 

Going by the headcodes, we have:

C839 1H02 - 1240 King's Cross to Hull

C 1005 1S19 - summer only 1100 King's Cross to Edinburgh 

C1007 1E01 - 0800 Edinburgh to King's Cross 

 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold
15 minutes ago, hexagon789 said:

Nice range of workings there with passenger, parcels and freight; Mk2 and Mk1 coaches.

 

Going by the headcodes, we have:

C839 1H02 - 1240 King's Cross to Hull

C 1005 1S19 - summer only 1100 King's Cross to Edinburgh 

C1007 1E01 - 0800 Edinburgh to King's Cross 

 

 

Many thanks, I've added the details to the captions.

 

David

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium

If it is a Pacer then definitely the 143 rather than the 142.

Those first two photos of Lolham are a good guide for modellers as to how the appearance of the countryside changes in a few months.

Back to the High Dyke photos, interesting that there were still fixed signals so late on what had always been a freight only branch (apart from the preservation activities of course).

And yes, a great view of that rather twisted LNER parcels van.

Jonathan

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, keefer said:

C1005 has one of the 'Generators' (D1500-19 or 47401-20) as there is an ETH jumper dummy socket to the right of the driver's side buffer.

 

Agreed. C1007 is also not 9006 "THE FIFE AND FORFAR YEOMANRY", as it is a Haymarket Deltic with a single line name.  That limits it to 9000, 9004, 9013 or 9016. My immediate suspicion was that it was a typo for 9016. By a process of elimination:  it's not 9000, as it has a full width footstep above the bufferbeam;  it's not 9004, as the plate is too short;  it's not 9013, as it has a crest (13 lost its very early). Therefore it has to be 9016 "GORDON HIGHLANDER".

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold

Good evening, David. That’s a great set of replacement photo’s of Lolham, on the ECML to the north of Peterborough. In the last photo’, of a class 25, 5280, on a down parcels train in July, 1972, you have a view with the train from a distance which is most atmospheric.
The latest photo’s of Stocksfield on the Newcastle to Carlisle line are excellent and show the somewhat better class of Pacer, the 143’s. In J09876, with 143017, on a Newcastle to Carlisle working in April, 1989, you can see that one of the black spots had been applied below the cab windows, but had been removed leaving some of itself behind. 
 

With warmest regards,

 

 Rob.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, DaveF said:

Some photos taken on holidays in North Wales in 970 and 1979 for today's replacements.

 

 

That's some impressive time-travelling!  🤣

 

Seriously, though, I have a soft spot for class 24s, 40s, 103s etc. in North Wales. We spent a touring holiday there, in 1971 and those glorious early images bring back some fond memories.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold

Good evening, David. That’s a delightful set of photo’s of North Wales in 1970 and 1979 at Tywyn. The first photo’, with class 24, D5077, on an up goods train in August, 1970, is an excellent composition, and you can see that the track, on the left, has blocks for the chairs to rest on, which are, every third one along, joined by a tiebar. In C4775, with a class 103, on a Pwlhelli to Machynlleth service, on the 10th August, 1979, you can see that the old track on the left had been lifted some time ago.

The Newcastle photo’s are an excellent selection, and in C13853, with 143324, on the 16th August, 1989, it can be seen how even the lowly Pacer makes a tremendous contrast to the work going on at the adjacent platform as part of the electrification of the station.

 

With warmest regards,

 

 Rob.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium
26 minutes ago, DaveF said:

For today's replacements we go as far north as possible on the railway network to visit Thurso.  

 

Four of photos were taken in June 1969.  At the end of the university year a group of us hired a croft for a week to explore the far north.  Unusually for those days two of the group had a car so we were mobile.  Secveral of us liked railways so we could visit railway locations.  One day we went to Thurso and spent a little while at the station. 

 

As you will see from the image numbers these were taken just after I started to take colour slides, even then I knew I wanted more than just loco portraits.

 

The fifth photo was taken while Dad was on holiday in 1973.

 

 

707089124_zbThursoClass2421stJune1969C003.jpg.fa23233f290dbe58111a7377521eb4a4.jpg

Thurso Class 24 21st June 1969 C003

 

 

1590452423_zbThurso21stJune69C009.jpg.a8680f1c06b9625eba0a3c4e96a7bfc9.jpg

Thurso 21st June 69 C009

 

 

813986223_zbThurso21stJune69C011.jpg.e36f33f2f29c14fb6322408b108cb51f.jpg

Thurso 21st June 69 C011

 

 

1464284902_zbThurso21stJune69C012.jpg.2172ba8af340a286d6e3e3b10b43c7b0.jpg

Thurso 21st June 69 C012

 

 

769935749_zbThursoAug73J3293.jpg.22b0a26f718591feb3e3f5bdd3e1970b.jpg

 Thurso Aug 73 J3293

 

 

David

C011 would definitely qualify for the 'When the real thing looks like a model' thread. 

  • Like 1
  • Agree 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold
51 minutes ago, iands said:

C011 would definitely qualify for the 'When the real thing looks like a model' thread. 

 

My thoughts exactly Ian,  there's no weathering on beams!

Great pictures David I'm really enjoying the repeats 

  • Like 1
  • Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold

Good evening, David. That’s a most excellent and atmospheric set of photo’s of Thurso from the 21st June, 1969 and August, 1973. That first photo’, with an unidentified class 24 is expertly composed, and shows all that is good about the station. The blue sky is a perfect backdrop. 
 

With warmest regards,

 

 Rob.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold

Good evening, David. Firstly, thank you for posting the photo’s on the line to Skegness, between Barkston and Boston. I’m confident that all are truly excellent, but there is an apparent issue with JVol3206, JMImageG02, and JMImageF04. Sadly, in my iPad, in the browser Ghostery, they appear in red, with the trains and scenery in dark grey. I hope your originals of those three photo’s are all as they should be. I’ve just checked in Firefox, and unfortunately the issue is present in it too.

The last photo’, of Boston goods South Junction level crossing, as it was in August, 1970, is such a typical everyday scene, which has been so perfectly captured by your Dad.

 

With warmest regards,

 

 Rob.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold
12 minutes ago, Market65 said:

Good evening, David. Firstly, thank you for posting the photo’s on the line to Skegness, between Barkston and Boston. I’m confident that all are truly excellent, but there is an apparent issue with JVol3206, JMImageG02, and JMImageF04. Sadly, in my iPad, in the browser Ghostery, they appear in red, with the trains and scenery in dark grey. I hope your originals of those three photo’s are all as they should be. I’ve just checked in Firefox, and unfortunately the issue is present in it too.

The last photo’, of Boston goods South Junction level crossing, as it was in August, 1970, is such a typical everyday scene, which has been so perfectly captured by your Dad.

 

With warmest regards,

 

 Rob.

 

Rob,

 

I don't know why that should happen, those three should simply be in black and white, they are OK both on my PC and laptop, using Chrome.

 

They are also correct using Edge.

 

David

Edited by DaveF
  • Agree 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold

Thank you, David, Leander, and JeffP. Now, I’ve restarted my iPad, and also tried Chrome on it, along with Safari. And on my MacBook, in Safari, the issue with those three photo’s persists. I’ve checked my profile, in case it has got corrupted in some way, by signing out of RmWeb, and still the issue is present. I’m not sure what else I can do. But thanks for checking the photo’s out. Something is amiss somewhere. I will keep trying different things out.

 

Best regards,

 

 Rob.

  • Like 2
  • Friendly/supportive 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...