Matt

Ah yes - was that one of EWS’ “no expense spared” cab cooling system fitted 66s?

Yeah unusually for me it was an immediate pre-order yesterday - normally I hum and hah and try to work out whether I really need it before buying anyway. Have a feeling on this one that might shift quickly as quite different to the norm and looks pretty impressive in photos so far.

Maybe the packaging Is filled with helium?

Ooh a crane!! Ordered. Good to see 25s breaking cover at last as well.

I had something that sounded similar with a Heljan loco on DCC. In end I concluded that the current draw was too much for that decoder - a different brand of decoder and all well. Decoder ex-Hj loco was fine in a different loco.

I think you may have ventured into a hotly debated area! I think best way to answer is with a “it depends” response. Many will say that some of the premium brands provide superior control /smoothness. I am sure this is true but will depend on the base model and what being used for. In my case I enjoy running scale length trains of 20-30 wagons at prototypical line speeds - no shunting around involved. All my stock is less than 20 yrs old consisting diesels with central motor as per Bachmann, Hornby etc. I don’t generally bother with capacitors as my layout is in a centrally heated room so track doesn’t get too dirty. I rarely tune my decoders beyond address and momentum. I have decoders from Lais, Bachmann, DCC concepts, Gaugemaster, ESU, Zimo and others and for how I use them I see very little difference*. All provide decent reliable performance for what I need. Where it is starting to get more complicated is with latest gen Bachmann /Accurascale / Cavalex diesels where more sophisticated lighting requires more advanced or specially programmed decoders. I’ve been adopting a “life’s too short “ approach here and sticking with the manufacturers recommended / supplied decoder for each of these. Others will have different perspectives based on how they use their models but that’s mine. Hope it helps, Matt *the only exception I’ve had is on some of my Heljan 26s which seem to draw slightly more amps than normal - in some cases I’ve had to use a “better”decoder to cope

Well deserved - great shop with large range displayed nicely and very friendly and helpful people behind the counter. Always a must-stop when in Edinburgh.

Hi Tim, have you managed to test the 40 with additional bits on curved track yet to see if works? I like the look of adding the bits but wonder if will obstruct the rotation of bogies on my 3rd rad curves. Have used the WHWW bits on some (original Bachmann) 20s to improve on the undernourished and missing bits - quite pleased with them but parts are quite brittle if get knocked. Thanks, M

And wing mirrors?

I found that the three separate piece ploughs couldn’t be used with NEM couplings even without the centre section - just not enough space for the NEM to move unless you have get shallow curves. I found the clip on alternative worked well but required some of the pipes trimming to avoid fouling in the plough as it moves with the coupling. But I’d mounted slightly different to how appears in your photos I think… my plough clips onto the NEM coupling shaft just forward of the NEM socket rather than onto NEM socket directly which is what it looks like you’ve done. This brings plough slightly forward and gives it quite a positive mounting and gets angle more right I think. Have used exactly same setup on my new Bach 37s using leftovers from my AS’s…

You are of course right - was getting my testbeds muddled!

I remember as a teenager reading an article in RM on 901 and taking upon myself to modify an old Hornby 47 to her. I was somewhat lacking in finesse with my technique for removing unneeded detail (including thick lines on sides) but managed to achieve something passable for 901. Sadly it all went wrong at the paint stage and heart was lost with the shell still languishing in a box somewhere i suspect…. Wasn’t there an intermediate stage where she was 601 and had class 56 bogies too? Not familiar enough with all the changes made to say whether one body with 2 different bogies would cover 601 and 901? As a Scottish region modeller I have no need for either but I would probably be tempted due to being a bit different. Anyway I’m sure she was loaned to Eastfield for some trials…….

001 was sans high intensity headlight whilst 625 was with - depending what OP was after. 625 also used the better class 47 tooling without exaggerated rivets. The heavy weathering might not be to everyone’s taste and the large unusually positioned nameplate makes renumbering a little more complex. Oddly they didn’t sell well with KMRC discounting them to shift - I picked up 2 cheaply and added a spare body picked up at a show for £10. Renumbering and naming is in my Round Tuit pile….

I’ve had a few Peco surface mount motors where the wire has pulled out - can be repaired with a touch of solder but pretty fiddly

Gareth I’m probably being thick but I can’t see the Warwells on your website - searched under wagons / Accurascale and Hattons but not showing. A search didn’t work either… im assuming the newly announced military models aren’t in your site yet either? my military “diversion” has become rather extensive thanks to you with models plural of most of the kits you’ve released so far!