-
Posts
6,697 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Gallery
Events
Exhibition Layout Details
Store
Everything posted by phil_sutters
-
Just a few from this year's London to Brighton - a couple of dozen more here - http://www.ipernity.com/doc/philsutters/album/1355718
-
Prototype for everything corner.
phil_sutters replied to jonny777's topic in UK Prototype Discussions (not questions!)
Could do, but I wouldn't want to be underneath, when chunks of parapet balustrade crash down from a great height. I really like Hangleton as a destination, but I have never been out in that direction. -
Prototype for everything corner.
phil_sutters replied to jonny777's topic in UK Prototype Discussions (not questions!)
If you are modelling the current scene you need to get a good stock of greenery to plant on and around your infrastructure. I don't know whether this guy or his mates will actually move onto the more crucial Buddleia forest that is growing along the London Road Viaduct in Brighton. In my experience in premises management for a social services department, Buddleia is a chronic pest, which gets into paving and wall mortar and weakens structures if not removed. It can also be seen from ground level sprouting from the coping along the top of the parapets. -
GWR 4-6-0 no.36 was a one-off heavy goods loco built, in 1896, to work the Severn tunnel line. It had a more conventional outline. 4-6-0 2601, shown above, was again a one-off, built in 1899 and a development of 36. The remaining nine Krugers were 2-6-0s built in 1902/3. This information is courtesy of Railway Magazine April 1928*, 'Modern Locomotive Practice on the GWR'. So maybe the Krugers reached wherever the Severn Tunnel coal trains went. That half-year volume is the only one I have, but I knew I had seen a Kruger somewhere and that seemed a likely place.
-
When did the LNER drop the L & N E R?
phil_sutters replied to Typeapproval's topic in UK Prototype Questions
Even by 1950-52 there were still grimy locos about. But not all! I imagine 2793 was recently ex-works. -
When did the LNER drop the L & N E R?
phil_sutters replied to Typeapproval's topic in UK Prototype Questions
All the photos I have in Dad's collection of LNER photos that have L&NER are from very early in the post-grouping period. These are a couple of examples. You can probably find more in this album http://www.ipernity.com/doc/philsutters/album/494007 -
There are more photos of Alliance in the other, photo-sharing, website that I use. http://www.ipernity.com/doc/philsutters/album/499693/@/page:7:18
-
While captioning some photos of HMS Alliance, taken at the Royal Navy Submarine Museum, Gosport, I noticed the proliferation of cigarettes and matches in the messes. So I went to look up the regulations. I came across this Hansard report from 1951, in which Royal Navy officers are complaining about restrictions and lack of clear guidance in the regulations on the issue of tobacco products. One was a Surgeon Lieutenant Commander encouraging smoking. How times have changed! https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/commons/1951/jun/21/royal-navy-duty-free-goods
-
(Please tell me if I posted wrong) Looking for Plans
phil_sutters replied to 844fan's topic in UK Prototype Questions
Current subscribers to Railway Modeller have access to the complete online archive of that magazine. If you can find a subscriber in your area may be they could access it for you. In 1985 Model Railway Constructor published a 'Model Drawings Reference Book' listing drawings up to that date, across all the four magazines in publication in that era. Whether there are any copies out there I don't know. -
Western Region Breakdown Crane Train Formations
phil_sutters replied to BluenGreyAnorak's topic in UK Prototype Questions
-
An Old Photo Album
phil_sutters replied to papagolfjuliet's topic in UK Prototype Discussions (not questions!)
There's some really good stuff there. Have you tried looking on the backs to see if there is any information there? If they were mine I would want to see if they would come out from under the tacky film without removing any of the photographs' surfaces. When I inherited my Dad's photo collection, there was an album with similar film on it. It did not seem to have affected the prints, but the discolouration of the film did detract from their appearance, so I took them out and scanned them individually. You can see the result at http://www.ipernity.com/doc/philsutters/album/494007 -
Third-Rail EMU Photos
phil_sutters replied to Claude_Dreyfus's topic in UK Prototype Discussions (not questions!)
-
Hope I got the right place, but I need some help
phil_sutters replied to 844fan's topic in Modelling Questions, Help and Tips
Having put this image into Google Lens - it appears to be an old Trix 3-Rail model. There seem to be other similar models about. To use Google Lens - copy your image, go to Google images and click on the 'Lens' icon/button at top right - and paste your image into the box. -
A quick online search brings up Intercity maps upto 1994, with both Blackpool and the Intercity routes in the NSE area.
-
Your link doesn't work as a link and it doesn't download as a jpg file.
-
A typical S&DJR train, c. 1902?
phil_sutters replied to Compound2632's topic in Somerset & Dorset Joint Railway Group
Looking a bit tired, at about 53 years old, and with gold instead of yellow in the lining. I have yet to replace the GWR grab handles with the elongated reversed 'S's in SDJR style. I only put steps on the 4 & 6 wheeled stock and did little to the under-solebar areas, apart from LSWR white metal bogies. -
- 888 replies
-
- 15
-
Presumably building materials would be required for building residential and business buildings - whether farming or crop processing or manufacturing. So brick, timber, sand, cement, corrugated iron, steel joists, glass etc. I guess these loads would not have been great or that frequent, but they would, like the farm machinery mentioned above, provide variety in the traffic.
-
Third-Rail EMU Photos
phil_sutters replied to Claude_Dreyfus's topic in UK Prototype Discussions (not questions!)
I thought for a moment that ONE was back in business. -
Seaford Station without a van - just a car at the edge - and some builders' bags, probably waiting for a van to pick them up! The road isn't wide enough to get the whole building in from a frontal viewpoint. I made a detour on the way to get my Sunday paper, thinking that Sundays may offer the best chance of a vehicle-free shot. The main roof was re-slated recently, following complaints of water penetration in the flats above. The single storey parts, which are let out commercially, haven't had the same treatment. So don't worry if your stock of roofing materials isn't adequate to do the whole roof!