Jump to content
 

DapolDave

Members
  • Posts

    1,150
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    7

Posts posted by DapolDave

  1. Hi Phil,

     

    Some of the first batch of green 52's are 'in country' and could be at Dapol mid week (customs release, transportation etc permitting).

    The first BR blue version should also be on the consignment but only 249 of the 500 of 1 deco, as that's all that could be built before staff started leaving for CNY

     

    (Staff started leaving very early this year).

     

    Then we have to put those together with nameplates that are still being completed by Shawplan and hen ship to stockists. So while not impossible I'd say its a tight timeline.

     

    Cheers

    Dave

    • Like 3
  2. Likewise or I'm going to be faced with a quartet of Venturers. Now there's a barber's shop act that never made it!

     

    Pix

    I'm going to try to get them attached with only a minimum of glue in the central part of the number and nameplate if possible.

    Cheers

    Dave

    • Like 1
  3. Hi Jerry,

    The nameplates, to stop people criticising the fitting in N gauge will be fitted I'm afraid.

     

    As for the time frame?

    Seriously I have no idea, I need to see how many workers return after CNY first.

    Cheers

    Dave

    • Like 1
  4. Hi Jim,

     

    Not sure your right I'm afraid. (I'm not saying your wrong mind you), but too many have checked and said its fine.

    Mark used his cad and measurements, we used our laser scan, we also used 'some' drawings.

     

    In fact as far as I remember (with the MR review) the height Is spot on, the width Is about 1/2 mm too narrow and because of extra Long buffer settings its 3mm too long.

     

    It's too late to change now in either gauge I'm afraid. I wish you'd said sooner.

    Cheers

    Dave

  5. I'm sorry Adrian,

     

    I call on all members here to ignore all postings by Adrian, as they are tainted with yummyness that, rather like too much sugar, cannot be good for us all.

     

    Oh, and you guys should see the N gauge version ;-)

    • Like 3
  6. On the subject of comparisons, it is true, isn't it, that the maroon plus small yellow panel model (my all-time favourite Western livery)I've pre-ordered from Hattons will be the same as the STEAM model in all respects except livery?? Just wondering as it's a round £56 cheaper!

    Production run of 400 only (ever!), lift rings, nameplates, livery air pipes etc all factory fitted. 3 signature certificate of limited edition. A box to die for, apparently a limited run badge in the box.

     

    Apart from all those, then it's the same model ;-)

    Cheers

    Dave

    • Like 11
  7. Hi loco fan,

     

    No it may not.

     

    Here's a little tip that's 85% successful in the customers I tell it to.

    It maybe that the gear has gone a little too far on the worm meaning that the motor operates but the signal doesn't.

     

    Try operating the signal as normal via the switch. At the same time flick (yes flick) the top or bottom of the signal, depending on which way the arm will go if properly operating. Strangely enough this should re engage the gear with the arm, although you might have to flick a couple of times for success.

     

    If that doesn't work it's back to the place of purchase for replacement.

    Fingers crossed

    Cheers

    Dave

    • Like 3
  8. Hi 0O00,

     

    no we wont be producing sound fitted versions as we are not big enough a company to manage that project.

     

    however i am putting the WLA together with Ian (Leggomanbiffo) from this parish to record probably the ultimate sound of a Wezzie for you to purchase from Ian.

    cheers

    Dave

    • Like 2
  9. Hi Jim,

     

    i'm not sure to be honest.

     

    The lift rings arent fragile at all (etched brass) but are losable and available as spares.

    The nameplates arent fragile (Shawplan).

    The replacement valances arent.

    The brake rigging comes off and is an interference fit to allow re-wheeling, so i suppose you could say thay the connection betwen it and the bogie is 'fragile' but it wont break as the plastic is too malliable.

    Air pipes etc are very strong but non brittle plastic.

     

    cheers

    Dave

    • Like 5
  10. Hi Neil,

     

    I think the headcode windows are a 'nadgers' (excuse the technical term here guys) too small, and as such the correctly sized numbers don't fit correctly within the window area.

     

    Are you referring to the central pillar visible behind the glass? If so it should bean easy fix or even remove?

    Cheers

    Dave

     

    I understand a Warship may be announced next month and not from Dapol :-(

    • Like 2
  11. I fully back Chris here guys,

     

    I think that there is a problem with the marking of the models in general though, but i doubt, even though i joke about it, that it's affected by other manufacturers etc.

    More like an inconsistency of review and pressure of publication dates.

     

    For those that have them on order the D1000 "Western Enterprise" models arrived at Dapol this afternoon but wont be shipped to Steam museum tomorrow by courier arriving Friday.

    I've contacted Steam to let them know about the delivery and they inform me that there's less than 10 left.

     

    cheers

    Dave

    • Like 2
  12. Hi Chris,

     

    Thanks for the reply.

     

    Recently there has been a spate of products reviewed with shall we say 'interesting' % marks.

     

    For example one got 99% and the reviewer failed to note that although it is a super model (i have 2), the lit table lamps were not in the right place at each table, or have lamp shades painted etc (ala the pullmanns) and were merely crude clear plastic dowels through the middle of each table.

     

    Another gave us 8 out of 10 for the 2884 loco performance but readily noted in the text it couldnt be tested!

     

    I see some models in MR with predominantly high marks but others (not just Dapol's i must add) with quite low marks.

    The 22 was a great case in point. it got lower than another model (albeit a special comission) and while the 22 has had and still gets rave review for it's accuracy and detail, the special commission one doesnt and gets poor comments on this forum. (same reviewer by the way).

     

    Although i think the % mark needs to be scrapped, it certainly effects me when i know we have a good product (or not, read below) which some view as terrific but it gets marked down a 'huge' by most standards out of 100% for quite a minor thing.

     

    As for the Western i'm now slightly mortified that people on RMWEB are saying the face is wrong, the cab windows are wrong and it needs work to make it look correct.

    I'm also dissapointed that some of those very same people have seen the model in the flesh, in pictures and cad/cams here and at shows for the last 12 months or so and have sat back and said nothing.

     

    Guys, if there was a problem then you should have spoken up. The reason i ask for comments is that i truly want us all to have the best we can make, but i hate the idea that i've goofed and gotten the face wrong. If only you'd have shouted out earlier i could have done something about it.

     

    Edited for clarity

    • Like 17
  13. Well there's a good review in this coming Model Rail which i received today.

     

    92% though as it apparently has fragile parts and easy detachment of brake rigging!  (oh and isnt branded on the box 'Heljornbymann" either. :jester: ), What do we have to do to get a higher mark?

    Seriously though, the brake rigging is a loose interference fit to allow re-wheeling and a blob of glue when you get yours is advised,

    and fragile detail parts!  design proper or design stupid? Do you want (as modellers) detail parts or dont you?

     

    It seems that possibly MR think that all detail parts should be solidly affixed (with all that implies regarding heavy looks etc) at any price, and that modellers arent willing to pay the retail price for 'fragile detail parts' as thats a poor design feature and have marked us down because of the latter.

     

    I'd appreciate opinions please.

    cheers

    Dave

    • Like 7
×
×
  • Create New...