Jump to content
 

atom3624

Members
  • Posts

    2,199
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by atom3624

  1. I reckon a certain manufacturer's class  comprising 200 editions should be considered ... sorry ... BUMP ...

    Class 40 bump !!

    Oh, and let's look at Fowler and Stanier's finest - Parallel Scot (tapered boilered Hornby Scot is excellent) and various versions of the Jubilee.

    The 8F's another that's been mentioned quite a lot, and I agree, a new version of this very popular locomotive would go down very well.

    Al.

    • Like 2
  2. Is it possible that the end bushing at the brushes end has been over lubricated, some weeping through to the brushes, POSSIBLY softening them, causing them to both arc and also break up more easily - filling in the gaps between the segments of the commutator?

    Or possibly they're too hard / fragile - the converse - which has caused them to fragment?

    The motor seems to be a very good one.

    When I had brushed R/C modified motors, there were different brush options - Cu impregnated, etc - harder but apparently better, but required you to clean the commutator more frequently as they arced more - something you really want to avoid.  Much of this related to people not 'bedding in' the brushes before applying 'full beans'.

    One way of breaking / bedding in new brushes was to run the motor on light power, in water ...

    Al.

    • Like 1
    • Interesting/Thought-provoking 2
  3. Brushless motors can generally be compared to a tuned engine - LESS torque low down (where you need it) but (depending on turns, wire thickness, etc) considerably more powerful, and higher revving in general cf brushed - from many years 'playing' with R/C cars and trucks!

    I don't think use of a BL motor would be a benefit to a heavy goods locomotive with a general need for low down torque, not top speed.

    Al.

    • Interesting/Thought-provoking 2
  4. How about .....

    Starting a trend to model diecast warbird aircraft in 1:76.2, not just the current 1:72?

    On a similar lateral thinking front, how about a modern rendition of Minic cars and trucks - making a flexible system which can utilise existing Oxford model cars as well?

    These of course could drive onto wagons ... self powered, or transporting slots to advance all at fixed speeds.

    Al.

    • Like 1
  5. Each to their own opinions, all perfectly valid.

    Many have been brought up commuting using MU's, whether 'D', 'E' or hybrid.

     

    These are very hard-working units and a mainstay on the mainlines of UK, but personally I find them totally without character and frankly boring.

    HST, 220/221, 390, 395 excepted.

    Model railways has always been exaggerated with an excessive number of locomotives hauling coaches or wagons for me, however invalid.

     

    Al.

  6. On 17/12/2021 at 12:33, ianwales said:

    Just about to put my LMS one up for sale on Ebay, what sort of price is reasonable to expect?

     

    Ian

    I'd be careful to avoid silly replies, but I'd just look at Clarks, Hattons and others, plus of course Ebay itself to see what they're going for in similar condition to your own.

    Al.

    • Agree 1
  7. This is definitely one of those rare beasts which is 'so extreme' it's a definite must have - biggest, most powerful - always a justification somewhere!!

    Who doesn't want to see 'how many' they can haul as well?  😄

    Even if sat in a siding much of the time, the immense size just dwarfs 'normal' medium-sized locomotives.

    Al.

    • Like 3
    • Agree 1
×
×
  • Create New...