Rail-Online
Members-
Posts
1,581 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Gallery
Events
Exhibition Layout Details
Store
Everything posted by Rail-Online
-
Hi Again, The attached is nothing to do with MR D299 opens but I cannot think of anywhere else it would be appreciated and it deserves to be shared. It was taken in Perth about 1925 and shown two former LNWR vehicles in LMS livery. The interesting one is to the right and is a LNWR Dia 45 Meat van in LMS livery which is not a livery varient shown in the LNWR wagon book. As can just be made out the LMS is in medium size script high up on the left side with Meat Van above it and presumably the wagon number and tare in a corresponding position to the right. The X on the lower right hand side designates it is a fitted vehicle (- did through piped vehicles also have this?) Anyway as an early LMS modeller I found it interesting......... Tony
-
I have always been told that the smell is not from the fish, it is from the polluted water running off them........ Tony
-
Yet another edge of a neg image, D299 I think but I cannot quite work out the wagon number. Initially it looks like 196753 but surely that is too many digits? Therefore I think the leading 1 may be a smudge. Willesden Jcn around 1928 - the coal tank has no LMS on its tender but 8261 in Crewe style hand painted script (but has lost its lamp sockets for lamp irons). The two railway staff are looking suspiciously into the wagon! What do you think the wagon number is? Cheers Tony
-
Whitwell Colliery was always owned by Shireoaks Colliery Co. and the wagons lettered as such. They worked down to London over both the MR and GC route. The owning company had three collieries, two only on the GCR and the other, Whitwell on the MR but with GCR running powers (the GCR collected three train loads of wagons a day just from Whitwell Colliery!), therefore I think Shireoaks Coll Co got favourable rates from the GCR so favoured them. The Durham Whilwell pit I know very little about but have seen a drawing of the headgear and it appeared very small - of course it may have been enlarged. Tony
-
Next time Tim comes ask him to bring some filler and paint so he can cover up that crosshead screw head on the reversing lever lifting link......... Tony
-
I was surprised to see colliery wagons from the Cannock coalfield tipping into barges on the Thames. Somehow I would have expected the load to travel all the way on a narrowboat. I guess the final destination must have been only river connected (or it was destined for a ships boiler?) otherwise the wagons would go straight into the location by rail. Do we know what colour the Asgill Goodman wagon was? Tony
-
Nothing like answering your own question! I missed the link to the actual report which I have now found............ The ballast brakes were Nos 840 and 832, the former possibly written off due to being 'Badly Smashed' I think it strange that the report lists the damaged wagons as 'Midland Ballast Wagon' etc rather than LMS etc - was this normal at this date I wonder? Tony
-
Stephen, A couple of questions, firstly are the numbers of the two ballast brakes recorded (I would guess the leading one was written off?), secondly given it is 1925 could some of the ballast wagons be from a non MR origin (or indeed were they al LMS)? Furthermore 3 plankers were all pooled and although they 'should' have been LMS wagons the engineering dept could have pinched someone elses wagon? Tony