Jump to content
 

Penrhos1920

Members
  • Posts

    1,283
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Penrhos1920

  1. On 02/06/2022 at 16:59, Penrhos1920 said:

    First a view from the middle of board 17 looking under the Blackbrook Rd bridge which crosses board 18. It shows the AD tracks on the left and Rhymney tracks through the middle.  In the background is the Rhymney Penrhos North signal box and the tracks spliting to Rhymney on the left and Caerphilly on the right.

     

    penrhos87s.jpg.f45a08812de0812df216429a8e5e3929.jpg

     

     

     

     

     

    Same road bridge but viewed from the other end of the junctions.  Looks like someone has filled the space with Rapido test prints.

     

    usatc-s160s-penrhosjunction-07apr1944-b.jpg.7478a4ff9e6c256497f0e33b49698454.jpg

     

    https://www.rmweb.co.uk/forums/topic/181073-usatc-s160-in-oo/page/2/

    • Like 3
  2. On 17/04/2024 at 07:42, Andy Keane said:

    Does anyone have a photo of an E19 to confirm the drawing that shows the narrow window on the the 5th compartment from the left hand end?

    https://gwrcoaches.org.uk/LowRoofs.shtml#E19

    It leads to a very shallow seat in that compartment.


    Sorry that’s a scanning error.  Most of the Jack Slinn drawings had to be scanned in 2 or 3 sections and then stitched together.  If you look at the compartment widths you’ll see it’s the same as the adjacent compartments.  Most Dean era coaches had the same width windows regardless of compartment width or class.  The exceptions are some Metro coaches, saloons and some corridor coaches.

    • Like 1
    • Informative/Useful 1
  3. On 14/04/2024 at 01:08, Schooner said:

    Two interesting photos, if one is interested in raising the profile of a certain class of tank engine...

    DSCF2091.JPG.775cd4172b42c891ce699a8030a

     

    😇

     

    Since you're all talking about the van at the backI'll chip in with my tuppence.  It has flat sides with no tumblehome and is possibly taller than the E40s in front of it.  So I'd say it wasn't built by the GWR.  It could be something they bought before 1870 or absorbed.

     

    Why is the train there?  Did Helston have a second platform at some time?

     

    What interests me is whatever is hiding behind the loco's chimney.  It that an eliptical roof?

     

    • Like 4
    • Agree 1
  4. 6 hours ago, Andy Keane said:

    As I potter on and wait for the new Rapido B set E140 coaches to arrive I have been wondering about what bogie coaches would have been used before the E140s got to Helston. I have a couple of photos of B-set like coaches at Helston and it would be good to know what diagrams they were. I think the first photo is E40. The second is rather like E19 but Russell's drawing of this does not show the bulge for brake handle next to the "slip" window on the end (I now see that the drawing of E19 on https://gwrcoaches.org.uk/LowRoofs.shtml#E19 does show the bulge so assume that must be what it is). Does anyone know better or have access to coach allocations for Helston in the Edwardian period?

    DSCF2091.JPG.775cd4172b42c891ce699a8030a5fc6b.JPG

    DSCF2072.JPG.b8e7bd8d0bcab052b7fd360f57ab662e.JPG


    E19 and E40 look about Wright. You’ll be very lucky to find any coach workings that early for Helston. You might consider a four coach set such as  T36 S9 U4 T47 or T49

    • Like 1
    • Informative/Useful 2
  5. On 19/03/2024 at 11:55, Coppercap said:

    It's hardly a 'variation' - I don't think anything you can see is common to the Kernow version. It would need to be a completely new model, and most unlikey to appear. These weren't very long lived when compared to the one we now have, limiting their appeal. Also, the fact that there isn't a 12" to the foot model to measure (only drawings, and photos) would make it even more unlikely.

     

     Alternately you could keep the power unit bogie and put the rest on eBay. I’m sure somebody would like to buy the body and convert it into an auto coach. 

    • Like 3
  6. On 16/03/2024 at 16:19, Guardian said:

    Dear All,

     

    As I recently aquired set 3 (choc/cream twin cities crest) of the Toplight City coaches, I am curious about the proper traction of such set prior to the introduction of GWR 61XX class in 1931.

     

    Was it simply the preceding sub-classes, I.e. classes 5101 and 3100/5100? Or (also) something completely different?

     

    Thank you.

     

    Best,

    Mark 

     

    Where the city trains hauled by Metropolitan electrics after the metropolitan was electrified around 1908?

  7. 1 hour ago, RapidoCorbs said:

    V17s being V16s fitted with screw couplings for working in France/Belgium. Although the couplings are not modelled, the van is painted as a V17 - converted back to V16 or X6 (later Y4) post-war.

     

     Didn’t they have the buffers packed out a couple of inches because the screw couplings are longer?   Other wagons that were fitted with screw couplings during the first world war for working in France definitely did. 

    • Like 1
  8. 17 minutes ago, Guardian said:

    Dear All,

     

    As I recently aquired set 3 (choc/cream twin cities crest) of the Toplight City coaches, I am curious about the proper traction of such set prior to the introduction of GWR 61XX class in 1931.

     

    Was it simply the preceding sub-classes, I.e. classes 5101 and 3100/5100? Or (also) something completely different?

     

    Thank you.

     

    Best,

    Mark 

     

     

    Metro tanks, eg 458 or County tanks

    • Like 3
    • Agree 2
  9. KT7/157  there’s no photographs. It is about the 20 ton wagons hired from the GWR. 

     

    KT6/115

     

    Gloucester wagons all red, white letters with black shading

    184 Bridgend 6 planks 

    1647, 1931, 2197 Bridgend 7 planks

    1055, 1145 Cardiff 7 planks.    all of these are from orders where the other numbers weren’t recorded. 

     

    In 1922 numbers 3300 to 3399 bought from Cambrian wagon works.   Numbers 3000 to 3599 also came from Cambrian in 1924. 

     

     

     

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1
    • Informative/Useful 2
  10. 12 hours ago, RapidoCorbs said:

    Who will be the first to carve theirs up to make this oddity?

     

    I've not found out the reason for some vans having this arrangement but I can confirm it is incredibly annoying when they show up in photos and you realise you can't use the running number.

     

    Y4post-36.JPG.d154360d8b30237f91ce1bdbc529299f.JPG

     

    The frame was built on a Friday afternoon?

  11. My father has recalled a time when he was young in a signal box.  2 panniers arrived at the home signal outside the box, uncoupled and running separately.  After the signalman set the road, Dad was told to pull off the signal, once the first pannier has moved off he returned the signal lever and a minute or so later he was told to pull it off again and once the 2nd pannier had left return the lever and then give 2-1 to the box down the line.

     

     

×
×
  • Create New...