Jump to content
 

ThePipersSon

Members
  • Posts

    266
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by ThePipersSon

  1. No

     

    To be pedantic :-

     

    No 1 was built with a lower front end and had a bus type interior with 69 seats.  Also, the only one with a single engine.

     

    Nos 2 - 4 kept the low front end, and had a buffet counter, two toilets and about 43 seats (?).

     

    Nos 5 - 16 had a different shaped front end, and the exterior doors switched from swing to sliding.  The interiors were similar within the series, but nos 10-12 had a toilet in place of a bay of seats (not in the same position as the buffet cars).  Nos 5 - 7 might be different as they were built in a different lot, but as far as I am concerned, the differences are a known unknown.

     

    That's all I can think of until someone contradicts me.

     

    Tom

  2. I had a quick browse through the 2 GWR Auto-trailer books by Wild Swan.  There are several examples of the engine attached to trailers at the chimney end, although I cannot be sure that these trains are operating in 'push-pull' mode.  However, one of the photographs was of the a train on the Brixham branch, with just an auto-trailer and loco, so I assume that would be operating in 'push-pull' mode.

  3. According to Model Rail no 49 (November 2002) all 5 types of Rail bus (including the track recording vehicle) were available as RTR in 1959.  The kit for an AC cars one was available in 1980.

    Sorry, not a positive sighting, but maybe someone else can provide one.

     

    Tom

  4. As far as I understand, the plan was to push for dieselisation region by region.  Originally, the western region was going to be third, of four, but then a new General Manager (Stanley Raymond?) was appointed who wasn't ex-GWR, and had a disliking for anything GWR.  He persuaded the BTC to change the order, making the western region the first in the queue for dieselisation.  So just a bit of internal politics!

  5.  

    Smithfield didn't handle containers - no room to lift them - so all traffic for there would have been loaded in vans of some sort.

     

    There's a picture in the GWR Engines book by Russell, showing one of the condensing panniers emerging from Paddington Suburban, and there appears to be several containers in the train.  Didn't the containers have doors, and  therefore could be unloaded without taking off the wagon?

     

    The picture is dated 1947.

  6. There is a good photograph of the facilities at Moreton-in-Marsh in the new book 'BR Parcels and Passenger-Rated Stock - Volume 3  Self propelled parcels vans, TPOs and car-carrying vehicles for motorail services'.  The reference on the photograph is Kidderminster Railway Museum ref 128203.  Presumably, the photograph is available from them, if you cannot get to see the book.

×
×
  • Create New...