Jump to content
 

Carflat from N Gauge Society


Revolution Ben
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • RMweb Premium

Hallo,

These would have been MK2Cs, now there's an interesting proposition. Picture this: a manufacturer finally decides to produce MK2Cs.........

hmmmmmm

es grüßt

pc

Mk2c,s would be nice but the Mk2s I've seen on Motorail photos all appear to be from earlier series...such as this train.

https://www.flickr.com/photos/96859208@N07/10021305963/in/pool-2259775@N23/

 

This is from the Motorail Flickr group https://www.flickr.com/groups/2259775@N23/pool/

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hallo,

Thanks for the reply and the link to the site. I have a copy of an earlier edition of Rail Express which featured Motorail services and the MK2s which were referenced in the article were identified as MK2Cs

 es grüßt

pc

 

Well they might of been referenced as being Mk2cs but there is the slight problem in that Mk2cs were air braked and NG carflats were vac braked. While some of the later carflats were air braked I don't think that any were used on motorail services i.e. the RL94xxx series.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well they might of been referenced as being Mk2cs but there is the slight problem in that Mk2cs were air braked and NG carflats were vac braked. While some of the later carflats were air braked I don't think that any were used on motorail services i.e. the RL94xxx series.

Not sure what you mean, BR had AB carflats - Tops code FVX, both air and vacuum braked. http://PaulBartlett.zenfolio.com/brmotorail/e124f4e5d

 

Paul

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure what you mean, BR had AB carflats - Tops code FVX, both air and vacuum braked. http://PaulBartlett.zenfolio.com/brmotorail/e124f4e5d

 

Paul

 

I very deliberately mentioned NG(V) not FVX. FVX are freight stock which is why I indicted I was not certain and I am happy for those who get interested in such things to expand on this.  I have no idea what period the reference to Mk2c is in the Rail express which is why I did not say that it was impossible just that (for later years when restored to passenger stock) it would not be likely to be seen together. The statement that the Mk2s mentioned by acg5324 were Mk2cs was not fully accurate; the photo evidence linked by acg5324 supports this, but does not exclude the odd use of Mk2b or c. Stock allocation of MK2cs, even prior to sectorisation means that FKs used on Motorail stock were Mk1s, Mk2zs and MK2as.

Edited by Bomag
Link to post
Share on other sites

I very deliberately mentioned NG(V) not FVX. FVX are freight stock which is why I indicted I was not certain and I am happy for those who get interested in such things to expand on this.  I have no idea what period the reference to Mk2c is in the Rail express which is why I did not say that it was impossible just that (for later years when restored to passenger stock) it would not be likely to be seen together. The statement that the Mk2s mentioned by acg5324 were Mk2cs was not fully accurate; the photo evidence linked by acg5324 supports this, but does not exclude the odd use of Mk2b or c. Stock allocation of MK2cs, even prior to sectorisation means that FKs used on Motorail stock were Mk1s, Mk2zs and MK2as.

 

You used the term CARFLAT. If you meant GUV - which is not what this topic is about, then there were airbraked Motorail lettered ones, NXA such as http://PaulBartlett.zenfolio.com/brnpccs/e2b492534 and NXX, with Motorail lettering http://PaulBartlett.zenfolio.com/brnpccs/eeb3bccb  If you look at your Longworth you will see there were 96 of these renumbered ones, But there are others including a little batch rated to run at 110mph which had modified end doors.

 

Paul

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have no idea what period the reference to Mk2c is in the Rail express which is why I did not say that it was impossible just that (for later years when restored to passenger stock) it would not be likely to be seen together. The statement that the Mk2s mentioned by acg5324 were Mk2cs was not fully accurate; the photo evidence linked by acg5324 supports this, but does not exclude the odd use of Mk2b or c. Stock allocation of MK2cs, even prior to sectorisation means that FKs used on Motorail stock were Mk1s, Mk2zs and MK2as.

 

Hallo again,

here the services and dates referenced with MK2c stock:

 

Olympia ->Perth 09.81

MK2C FK x5, BFK, Carflat x13

Olympia ->Perth 05.81

MK2c FK x4, MK1 RBR, MK2c FK, BFK, Carflat x12

 

All other "classic services" with carflats are referenced with MK1

 

Wonder if any of the RMWeb community can comment on the accuracy. I've always viewed Rail Express to provide reliable Information.

 

es grüßt

pc

Link to post
Share on other sites

You used the term CARFLAT. If you meant GUV - which is not what this topic is about, then there were airbraked Motorail lettered ones, NXA such as http://PaulBartlett.zenfolio.com/brnpccs/e2b492534 and NXX, with Motorail lettering http://PaulBartlett.zenfolio.com/brnpccs/eeb3bccb  If you look at your Longworth you will see there were 96 of these renumbered ones, But there are others including a little batch rated to run at 110mph which had modified end doors.

 

Paul

 

No I mean Carflats - NGVs 96250-96265 dia NG502 sector code IMRX (1989) based at EN. They were renumbered from wagons, apparently due to sectorisation, in 1985 until Carfalts were supplanted by an expanded fleet of NX GUVs (coupled with a reduction in traffic) in the late 1980s. You have a single picture of one on your website (B745645) which was not actually one of the renumbered vehicles (presumably it was condemned before it was renumbered).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hallo again,

here the services and dates referenced with MK2c stock:

 

Olympia ->Perth 09.81

MK2C FK x5, BFK, Carflat x13

Olympia ->Perth 05.81

MK2c FK x4, MK1 RBR, MK2c FK, BFK, Carflat x12

 

es grüßt

pc

 

Was there a date indicated in the mag?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lovely picture in the recent modern locomotives illustrated of a blue Warship hauling 4 China clay wagons and 5 empty motor rail wagons.

 

I'm sure there are other pictures out there, but If ever there was a reason to get these models, in my books, that picture is it.

 

Cheers

Dave

Link to post
Share on other sites

and of course I cannot remember where exactly, but I have seen a photo in the net of the Brockenhurst portion of the Motorail Service to Stirling with 4 coaches, 2 sleepers, and 2 day coaches

 

I've only just caught up on this thread, hence the late reply to this post. The book you saw the photo was "BR Blue No1, Southampton and the New Forest" by John Dedman. It was taken on 8th June 1980. There's the four coaches already mentioned of which the day coaches are an FK and a BFK. On the only carflat visible, incidentally fitted with B4 bogies, are a BMW 1602, Vauxhall Viva, Austin Allegro and what appears to be a VW Golf Mk1 partially obscured by a tree.

 

Regards

David

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've only just caught up on this thread, hence the late reply to this post. The book you saw the photo was "BR Blue No1, Southampton and the New Forest" by John Dedman. It was taken on 8th June 1980. There's the four coaches already mentioned of which the day coaches are an FK and a BFK. On the only carflat visible, incidentally fitted with B4 bogies, are a BMW 1602, Vauxhall Viva, Austin Allegro and what appears to be a VW Golf Mk1 partially obscured by a tree.

 

Regards

David

Hallo,

Post Nr. 77 has the link to the flickr site where I saw the photos.

Thanks for replying, must be the same photo

es grüßt

pc

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...
  • RMweb Gold

Hello all,

 

Just in time for the Warley National Model Railway Exhibtion at the NEC Farish have sent through CADs of the forthcoming Carflat. These are not the finished article, and there are some details to correct, but they seem like a prett decent start to me.

 

 

post-420-0-35022100-1480036099_thumb.png

 

We are doing versions as originally built in the early 1960s with BR1 bogies and vacuum braked, and as later fitted with faster B4 bogies and air-braked.

 

post-420-0-88330700-1480036116_thumb.png

 

Some versions are dual braked with both vacuum and air.

 

post-420-0-21124600-1480036129_thumb.png

 

The bogies, braking, Motorail placards and buffing plates (which are being finessed) are details that vary from model to model.

 

Cheers

 

Ben A.

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium

Looking good Ben.......the middle CAD image seems to have solid panels near the ends is that an optical illusion?

Pleased to see that they have cracked the Kinetic coupler issue.....I had to remove them with my scratchbuilt versions and revert to Talgo bogie fitted couplers.

Edited by acg5324
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Andy,

 

Good spot. I think those panels are for the Railease variant. See photo of the prototype here: https://goo.gl/images/tf72Bj

 

Cheers

 

Ben A.

This is the correct link http://paulbartlett.zenfolio.com/raileasecarflat/h5FC99F34#h5fc99f34

This http://PaulBartlett.zenfolio.com/raileasecarflat/e5fc9a872 shows the end board better.

 

Carflats are a nightmare. Fortunately the basic info given in our BR wagon book seems to have held, and the origin of each of the BR ones is given in

Longworth, Hugh (2013) B R Mark 1 and mark 2 coaching stock. Publ. OPC (Ian Allan) Herhsam Surrey ISBN 978 0 86093 650 3. Of course, the Privately owned ones just add to the complexity, not least the MAT ones which differed to all BR ones by using SR coach frames http://paulbartlett.zenfolio.com/matcarflat

 

Paul

Edited by hmrspaul
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Gang,

 

I'm assuming that much of the below sole bar detail is almost a direct read across from the Blue Riband coaches, so much of that detail should already be locked down. Of course the uppers will vary by era and lot number of modification, so careful study of available photographs will probably be needed for me to get the exact combination right for my requirements. The initial late blue with Motorail branding and B4 bogies may not stand up to close study, depending where to site them At the various ends of my modelling eras....

 

Later,

Stu from EGDL.

Edited by Stu from EGDL
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold

Hi Stu,

 

I should add that these were early CADs sent over to show members the overall "look" of the thing; the Farish designer was very clear that at the moment they represent something of a chimaera of details and exact combinations of branding/braking/bogies etc are yet to be specified for each livery variant.

 

But you're right about the commonality with the Mk 1s; I have no idea how the factory will handle them but I would assume they can use moulds they already have for parts like the trusses, brake parts, buffers etc.

 

cheers

 

Ben A.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium

I thought the Chinese factories liked to keep tooling for one project together. i.e. a new underframe tool will be made for the car-flat (as a copy and paste) that can then be kept with (or is part of) the rest of the tooling for the car-flat specific parts. That way the tooling required for a model isn't stored in another factory across town. For the car flat it would also mean that parts that aren't needed like battery boxes and dynamos don't have to be produced.

 

Happy modelling.

 

Steven B.

Edited by Steven B
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...