RMweb Gold Zero Gravitas Posted November 26, 2016 RMweb Gold Share Posted November 26, 2016 Well, it's here. Edited by Karl Crowther. Contents:Canada Street - Peter JohnsonGWR Narrow Gauge Point Drawings - Peter KazerSmall Suppliers ForumBaseboards for Rugged Terrain - Peter TatlowThe Ultimate 4mm K3 - Tom MallardThe Maunsell 58ft Rebuilt Coach - Philip HallLettersDiaryLet the seriousness commence!(Edited because it's Canada Street, not Canada Road. You really can't get the staff these days) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold Zero Gravitas Posted November 26, 2016 Author RMweb Gold Share Posted November 26, 2016 Just for the record, Canada Street is unbelievably good. To quote from the text, there is not going to be any "assuming it is invited" to exhibitions about it. I suspect Peter Johnson will be fighting off invitations with a stick. (Quick sanity check - was that serious enough?) (Edited - Canada Street, not Canada Road) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium t-b-g Posted November 26, 2016 RMweb Premium Share Posted November 26, 2016 I have seen Canada Road a couple of times at shows and the quality of the modelling is just stunning. the most recent time was at Hull show a couple of weeks ago. I was there all weekend and able to spend a deal of time looking at it and it is one of those layouts where each time you look you see something that you didn't spot before. It will be interesting to see how well it photographs when I get my copy but photos are a good way of being able to search out all the little gems that you may miss on a short viewing at a show. I am glad to see that the 2 thread MRJ approach is carrying on. I think it works well. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold Zero Gravitas Posted November 26, 2016 Author RMweb Gold Share Posted November 26, 2016 It will be interesting to see how well it photographs when I get my copy but photos are a good way of being able to search out all the little gems that you may miss on a short viewing at a show. I am glad to see that the 2 thread MRJ approach is carrying on. I think it works well. I think it photographs wonderfully - look at the top photograph on page 293 when your copy arrives. It's one of those "that must be the prototype" moments. There's even a track plan (yes, I know that's verging on the not-quite-serious) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Poggy1165 Posted November 26, 2016 Share Posted November 26, 2016 Weathering of those mineral wagons on the cover; absolutely awesome. Fantastic layout. It doesn't get much better than this, if at all. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold Dan Randall Posted November 26, 2016 RMweb Gold Share Posted November 26, 2016 Weathering of those mineral wagons on the cover; absolutely awesome. Agreed. The open top-flap door is a nice touch as well. Regards Dan Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold Captain Kernow Posted November 27, 2016 RMweb Gold Share Posted November 27, 2016 I read the whole Canada Street article last night and took such pleasure from it and the accompanying photos. It is just stunningly well done. Another key piece for me was the article by Philip Hall on the Hornby L&SWR coaches, some really subtle treatment of already excellent RTR. I haven't yet really tackled the Tom Mallard piece yet, his work is just so good as to be actually intimidating. The Small Suppliers forum had one item of interest, in that I hadn't realised that the Brassmasters Easichas for the Bachmann Midland 1F had only just come out, for some reason I thought it had been out for some time. The photo of the 2mm 64XX was also pretty impressive. A non-nonsense comment from Richard Chown in one of his letters, to the effect that exhibitors are there to entertain the public, so just 'get on with it'. Strong words, and clearly correct on one level. I was aware of Not Jeremy's plans for a continental-themed show in Bradford-on-Avon, but wasn't aware that it will be in 2018, and not next year. So will this be in lieu of LarkRail for that year, Simon? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
enginelane Posted November 27, 2016 Share Posted November 27, 2016 I have seen Canada Road a couple of times at shows and the quality of the modelling is just stunning. the most recent time was at Hull show a couple of weeks ago. I was there all weekend and able to spend a deal of time looking at it and it is one of those layouts where each time you look you see something that you didn't spot before. It will be interesting to see how well it photographs when I get my copy but photos are a good way of being able to search out all the little gems that you may miss on a short viewing at a show. I am glad to see that the 2 thread MRJ approach is carrying on. I think it works well. Can confirm that it will be at the Wakefield Model Railway Show Nov 2017. I saw it at York couple of years ago and it looked and operated great. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium Izzy Posted November 27, 2016 RMweb Premium Share Posted November 27, 2016 I have yet to see 251 but for those craving more shots of Canada Street you can always visit here and enjoy a feast of quality modelling: http://www.emgauge70s.co.uk/ Izzy Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Talltim Posted November 27, 2016 Share Posted November 27, 2016 I've been on that site before, but this time I've just discovered the Eastwell Iron company, which impressed me at an exhibition many years ago but had forgotten its name Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
westerner Posted December 1, 2016 Share Posted December 1, 2016 I loved the article on Canada Street, the industrial architectural modelling is superb, but could someone tell me how the uncoupling is done on the layout. Never having seen it one would believe on a shunting layout there is coupling and uncoupling but, unless I've missed it, it wasn't mentioned in the article. I ask because the high buildings, particularly in the dock area, would make the hand of God shunting difficult and if done from the front quite intrusive for the viewer. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jwealleans Posted December 1, 2016 Share Posted December 1, 2016 I've seen the layout and been quite bowled over by it, but I cannot at all recall how the uncoupling was done. All I can say is that it wasn't intrusive. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium CloggyDog Posted December 1, 2016 RMweb Premium Share Posted December 1, 2016 Canada Road used 3-link/screw couplings (magnetic lower link, IIRC). So, on the assumption that Canada Street uses the same stock... (I say assumption, I'm 99% certain it's the same stock - many of the em70s group share stock and certainly their layouts that I've seen/helped operate were all 3-link/screw coupled) 'tis a bloody nice layout, no question about that! As for keeping the public entertained at exhibitions, I think the context of the show itself might also be a factor - at a ma, pa & urchins show then yes, keep the trains running (even if demonstrably way beyond line capacity or prototypicalness). At a 'scale' show, where the attendees will probably have a higher level of knowledge, I'd sooner see a layout operated prototypically, especially with regard to things like signally capacity, line speed and the rule book. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jol Wilkinson Posted December 2, 2016 Share Posted December 2, 2016 Canada Road used 3-link/screw couplings (magnetic lower link, IIRC). So, on the assumption that Canada Street uses the same stock... (I say assumption, I'm 99% certain it's the same stock - many of the em70s group share stock and certainly their layouts that I've seen/helped operate were all 3-link/screw coupled) 'tis a bloody nice layout, no question about that! As for keeping the public entertained at exhibitions, I think the context of the show itself might also be a factor - at a ma, pa & urchins show then yes, keep the trains running (even if demonstrably way beyond line capacity or prototypicalness). At a 'scale' show, where the attendees will probably have a higher level of knowledge, I'd sooner see a layout operated prototypically, especially with regard to things like signally capacity, line speed and the rule book. My experience is that not just mater, pater and sprogs who demand a continual steam of trains. Many so called "modellers" want the same but they often do not appreciate or recognise the effort that goes into creating a detailed model. Conversely, they would soon complain about a lack of "background". Yes, it is different at the finescale shows, but how many of us actually know about prototypical operation for models of railways depicting a scene fifty, sixty or one hunded years ago? How many layout, unless modelled on a particular location are sufficiently accurate to the locality, company or period for correct operation? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold Captain Kernow Posted December 2, 2016 RMweb Gold Share Posted December 2, 2016 Yes, it is different at the finescale shows, but how many of us actually know about prototypical operation for models of railways depicting a scene fifty, sixty or one hunded years ago? Well, we'll just have to rely on the wisdom of Bob Essery I suppose. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold Captain Kernow Posted December 2, 2016 RMweb Gold Share Posted December 2, 2016 How many layout, unless modelled on a particular location are sufficiently accurate to the locality, company or period for correct operation? Well, I suppose that comes under the heading of 'research', but 'operations' has long been a somewhat neglected part of this hobby. If you have sufficient information, photos etc., you can reproduce exactly the pattern of rust and weathering on your authentically-painted pagoda shelter, but who knows whether the little goods yard just up the line was served by the pick-up goods in just the Up direction only? ** ** Edit - Bob Essery might have written about it somewhere. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium ELTEL Posted December 2, 2016 RMweb Premium Share Posted December 2, 2016 Canada Street will be at the Stafford Exhibition on 4th & 5th February 2017 along with a number of other EM & P4 layouts. Full information of Layouts and Traders attending can be found on our website www.staffordrailwaycircle.org.uk/exhb I will be posting updates of our exhibition now that Warley is over for another year following the Manchester exhibition. I will be on the Stafford Railway Circle club stand at Manchester or operating Crimson Road a club Members layout. Terry Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold Not Jeremy Posted December 2, 2016 RMweb Gold Share Posted December 2, 2016 Well, we'll just have to rely on the wisdom of Bob Essery I suppose. Ahem, might Martin Nield possibly provide some assistance in that new book wot he has wrote? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold Captain Kernow Posted December 3, 2016 RMweb Gold Share Posted December 3, 2016 Ahem, might Martin Nield possibly provide some assistance in that new book wot he has wrote? And there he takes the opening so kindly provided! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold Not Jeremy Posted December 3, 2016 RMweb Gold Share Posted December 3, 2016 And there he takes the opening so kindly provided! You are indeed too kind…. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hroth Posted December 3, 2016 Share Posted December 3, 2016 I like the festive appearance of the front cover! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
John_Hughes Posted December 6, 2016 Share Posted December 6, 2016 I like the festive appearance of the front cover! Indeed - but there's no Christmas competition! Otherwise the issue is, one might say, a proper cracker! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lightning Posted December 19, 2016 Share Posted December 19, 2016 But seriously though, and in all seriousness may I wish all you serious modellers a very merry Christmas. P.s. try not to be too serious! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Porcy Mane Posted December 19, 2016 Share Posted December 19, 2016 I wish all you serious modellers a very merry Christmas. Oi! Stay on topic or you'll be red carded. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
olivegreen Posted December 19, 2016 Share Posted December 19, 2016 As for keeping the public entertained at exhibitions, I think the context of the show itself might also be a factor - at a ma, pa & urchins show then yes, keep the trains running (even if demonstrably way beyond line capacity or prototypicalness). At a 'scale' show, where the attendees will probably have a higher level of knowledge, I'd sooner see a layout operated prototypically, especially with regard to things like signally capacity, line speed and the rule book. … and one train per day in each direction... (Hat, coat etc etc…) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.