Coupling
No, wait.....not that kind!
Whilst waiting until I can start track laying, I have been having an experiment with couplings. As Ropley will essentially be end-to-end, there is no need for me to make allowances for stock negotiating sharp curves. The led to me wonder if there was scope for closing the gap between the new Farish Mk.1 coaches. I'll let the photos below do most of the talking but others may find the results of this tinkering useful?
Photo 1: This is the standard distance between the new Mk.1s. Better than the cavernous gap of old, but still not brilliant:
Photo 2: The coach on the right of the photo has been fitted with a shank Farish coupling (379-402) and the difference speaks for itself, but, will they make it round a corner without buffer lock and the inevitable disaster that follows?
Photo 3: Thanks to the close coupling system Farish put on, yes, they will! This is a bog standard Uni Track curve but I'm sure they will make it round a second radius Peco setrack curve too. 1st Radius might be pushing it though.
Photo 4: So what about coach to engine? I tried the 3MT first but because of the way the NEM pocket is fixed to the leading bogie a short coupler just won’t fit due to it being set back slightly, but when coupled to a coach with a short coupler the gap isn’t too bad:
Photo 5: The black five has no such issues and when coupled short to short closes the gap nicely and still negotiates the curves without buffer lock:
Photos 6 & 7: The 4MT is probably the tightest of all three when you have a short to short coupling and the buffers do touch on the curves, but there is no buffer lock as the close coupling system of the coach pushes them apart as they exit the curve. This means the gap between loco and coach is getting on for being almost scale-ish. There is a similar problem to the 3MT at the front, however the NEM pocket isn't set quite so far back so the short coulings just fit:
Photo 8: Running engine first with a short to short coupling the gap is slightly greater so there are no problems here at all:
So, hopefully Ropley will feature stock coupled at a more scale distance without the need to replace the bog standard Rapido. It’s still not the prettiest solution around but it does make coupling/uncoupling much easier!
Cheers all,
Tom.
- 2
9 Comments
Recommended Comments
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now