Jump to content
 

CF MRC

RMweb Premium
  • Posts

    2,031
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by CF MRC

  1. As mentioned previously, I have taken some photos of the fabrication of the second somersault signal. The main components come from MSE (Wizard Models). The etch doesn’t quite manage the holes for the operating linkage so these were drilled out 0.2mm for the linkage and 0.3mm for the pivot. 
    IMG_9660.jpeg?width=960&height=720&fit=b

    The signal arm bracket requires a bit of work to help locate it on the doll. Working on the principle that it easier to drill a long 0.5mm hole through the doll rather than 0.3mm, the bracket was bushed with a length of Albion Alloys brass tube, OD 0.5mm, ID 0.3mm. This then acts as the pivot for the spectacle and back blind. The far end of the bracket also needed building out with a washer. These components were located in a vermiculite block using pins and soldered together.
    IMG_9661.jpeg?width=960&height=720&fit=b

    The pivot bush makes it easy to locate the bracket on the doll.

    IMG_9664.jpeg?width=960&height=720&fit=b
    Once in place, the front face of the pivot on the bracket was filed flush, as the spectacle has to work behind the signal arm.IMG_9666.jpeg?width=960&height=720&fit=b

    The spectacle was soldered to some 0.3mm brass rod and filed flush. It was then linked up with a length of thin phosphor bronze wire through the 0.2mm diameter hole in the actuator arm.IMG_9667.jpeg?width=960&height=720&fit=b

    The PB linkage was bent forward in the position of the application point on the signal arm.IMG_9670.jpeg?width=960&height=720&fit=b

    The three components were then chemically blacked to prevent soldering (but scraped off where the collars / back blind needed to be soldered on.

    IMG_9671.jpeg?width=960&height=720&fit=b

    Once on the bracket the pivot pins were retained with a collar  and the back blind, which was also used to connect the drive rod.IMG_9672.jpeg?width=960&height=720&fit=b

    IMG_9673.jpeg?width=960&height=720&fit=b

    This arm doesn’t quite pivot as vertically as the other one: the linkage length and pivot relationship is critical, but it is within the normal range. I am jolly glad that I don’t have any more to make as working arms on this signal bridge as my patience and eyes are pretty well exhausted. 
     

    Tim

     

     


     

    • Craftsmanship/clever 2
    • Round of applause 1
  2. Mick Nicholson has sent me this fascinating MRN article from 1935. 
    IMG_9658.jpeg?width=960&height=720&fit=b

    For our younger readers, here is a comparison picture of a current £1 coin compared to the half-crown (12.5p in ‘new’ money). 
    IMG_9659.jpeg?width=960&height=720&fit=b

    A little bit bigger than T gauge, but a very, very small prototype. 
     

    Tim

    • Like 15
    • Craftsmanship/clever 2
  3. We stopped at the Kilner Co offices, which received a third storey by the time we modelled them. The model was made by Tom Knapp in Hawaii. 
    07611C12-4C3D-4DD3-93C9-2B4143DE8EFA.jpe

    The south end operator is effectively sitting in the Regents canal. 
     

    Tim 

    • Like 12
    • Round of applause 3
  4. 1 hour ago, Caley Jim said:

    Can I ask why the gantry was so high and the signals suspended so far down from it?

     

    Jim

    It’s presumably to give sighting from the tunnel, Jim. They do seem quite extreme though.  Maintaining  them would have been a bit of a game. 
     

    Replying to David, we always use aerial photographs - originally ‘proper’ images in the 1980s. There are none of this area with decent resolution at this period. (1920s). There is nowadays a massive resource on-line which can be usefully image manipulated to yield lots of information. 
     

    Tim

    • Like 1
    • Informative/Useful 2
  5. Thanks for that David. They probably would have remained in GNR condition as the gantry was taken out of service in 1932 with the KX re-signalling. There is another signal in the vicinity which is rather fun. 
    IMG_0067.jpeg?width=960&height=720&fit=b

    The image also shows step pegs on the nearer dolls and only partial railing on the gantry at high level. The more you look the more you see…

     

    Tim
     

     

    • Like 10
  6. In fact, the loco is currently being charged-up to see how it performs (I will probably be in touch with Giles Favell to compare notes on ‘tuning’.) It really is a pretty engine and deserves to get the Joy valve gear made and finished: trouble is there is a 2mm loco also in the works at the moment…

    On the layout front, I am about to acquire four superb baseboards made by the late Mike Randall for an erstwhile 2mm scale layout. These will fit Lynton perfectly, but the 2mm stuff on top will need removing and then tidying up the box beam frames. The new layout will be a fitting tribute to Mike, who was responsible for the CF structural build.

    The plan is well sorted and the turnouts were made by Keith Armes (one of his last projects). I have just ordered a stock of sleepers from Marcway for the remaining plain track (i.e. most of it).

    One of the biggest psychological stumbling blocks was the station and goods shed tiled rooves. I am using the Outback Models kits as a basis, and the printed tiles just don’t work - I can get a good stone effect, but the tiles need more work. I think I now have a solution from Scale Model Scenery. 

    It’s good to have lots of projects…

    Tim

    • Like 2
  7. The ECMs, I recall, had three settings of feedback on them. Even so, they weren’t very kind to Graham Farish motors (which were in the majority of mechanisms in the early days).  The mechanisms were slowly replaced and all our locos now have coreless motors. The ECMs were replaced by Pentrollers in the early ‘90s which Stewart Hine developed for Pendon.  These also had three feedback settings depending on the motors in use: we always used the coreless settings. These have been replaced on the mainlines by PICtrollers in the last ten years, which automatically sense the motor type and adjust feedback accordingly.

     

    Tim

     

    • Like 3
    • Informative/Useful 3
  8. On 15/04/2024 at 11:19, Captain Kernow said:

    Would you mind saying what kind of controller you use with the coreless motors, please?

    Thanks. 

     

    These were originally controlled with ECMs running on a low feedback setting (not ideal for any N gauge motors) then with Pentrollers, when they became available, and more recently PICtrollers. For testing locos I use a straight DC controller. 
     

    Tim

    • Like 3
    • Thanks 1
    • Informative/Useful 2
×
×
  • Create New...