-
Posts
1,122 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Gallery
Events
Exhibition Layout Details
Store
Blog Comments posted by Jim Martin
-
-
James
See reply to your post on the forum.
Jim
-
No worries. There's another, similar file that's linked from http://www.renfe.com/empresa/mercancias/intermodal/vagones.html which covers intermodal wagons, including the various 4-wheelers used for carrying swapbodies (the "catalogo vagones" link on the right). http://www.pecovasarenfe.com/EN/parque_vagones.html has some info on vehicle-carrying wagons (Pecovasa is Renfe's auto-business subsidiary).
When I went searching for this stuff a few years ago there were similar data sheets for hoppers and tank wagons, but I can't see them any more. It might be worth poking around the website though.
Jim
-
Hi. Go to http://www.renfe.com/empresa/mercancias/siderurgicos/parque_vagones.html and select the "Cerrados(PDF)" link at the top right of the page. It goes to a pdf of wagon data sheets, including number ranges. "Cerrados" are covered wagons, including coil wagons; "Abiertos" are opens and "plataforma" are flats.
I developed a minor side interest in Renfe after a trip to Port Bou a few years ago. It never went anywhere but I did find some interesting wagon data!
Jim
-
Hi Jonas
It's crossed my mind, but it's never really been close to happening. I know that someone did cast this type of wagon - there was a photo in issue 6 of Grahame Hedges' old N'spirations magazine - and if I'd known how long this project was going to take, I'd have been sore tempted myself. That said, I've always been keen to explore the different looks that the hoods of these wagons have; and that would require doing each one separately.
I did give serious thought to casting the core - essentially the part that I've just completed - for consistency of dimension and shape. I didn't follow it up because I had doubts about the adhesion of the filler to the resin.
-
Coming along very well. It has a definite Great Central look to it.
I think you've made the right choice with the splashers. I first saw that drawing years ago (in Tuplin, I suspect) and they never looked right to me as drawn. The continuous splasher definitely looks better, not to mention more in keeping with other designs of the same period.
Jim
-
I expect it'll work out for the best. At times like this I try to remember the Samuel Beckett quote:
Ever tried, ever failed
No matter
Try again, fail again
Fail better
I've started on the replacements and I'm happy, at this very early stage, that they're going to look better than the originals.
-
Dapol are producing a conversion kit which is supposed to allow you to retro-fit older models and non-Dapol stock with NEM pockets (and, by extension, with their couplers). This looks like a very well thought-out product, from what I've seen. I was planning to standardise on MicroTrains' couplers, but I'm now leaning towards Dapol instead, simply because this product is available and I think that Dapol couplers will work out cheaper than MT.
Jim
-
Simon
Airbrushing sits right up there with soldering as a thing that I did a few times (badly) many years ago and haven't mastered since, but if ever a livery was designed for the total beginner in mind, surely this is it? This is definitely on my long-term to-do list.Your blue looks spot-on: will you be adding white logos?
Martyn
I must admit to not having noticed the difference in the cab doors. I was thinking that it would be relatively straightforward to rebuild the ends of an FNW blue unit and renumber it, but in fact it would probably be easier to start with a 150/2 unit out of the box and just work out a way of marking out the gold star. I should have known it was too good to be true!
Jim
-
Interesting: I've been reading about Green Stuff and it sounds like a stickier version of Milliput. Is that a fair description? I have to say that I have minimal experience of Milliput too, but at least I have used it.
Is the superglue necessary to actually stick the putty to the base structure underneath, or does it form a surface that the GS adheres to better than it does to styrene? I dob (technical term) the filler on by hand and I'd be a bit hesitant about doing it that way with a load of superglue around. I don't fancy walking round with a wagon stuck to my hand!
Jim
-
The brickwork is excellent; and excellently painted, too.
Also, another thanks for posting the hackerspace link. I've been reading up on the one in Liverpool and I may well go down there to have a look round in the next few weeks. Coincidentally, it turned out that one of my work colleagues is actually a regular attender there and his photo is on their website
Jim
-
I only found your blog a couple of days ago, but I love what you're doing. My plans include a set of JMAs in N gauge, so I'm fascinated to see how you're going about designing these bogies. Brilliant work!
Jim
-
I hadn't noticed that in the photos, but now you mention it...
To be honest, it never occurred to me to only take off part of the rib. You're probably right about it not being absolutely necessary, but I was thinking about the wheel moving sideways slightly when the bogie swung on curves.
The chisel blade isn't a bad idea. At the very least you would always be working in towards the centre of the wagon, which would be a bit less stressful than doing it the way I did.
-
Good job! I was a bit unsure about the extra length, but it really doesn't show on the finished model. I guess that shows that you've captured the character of the thing.
Jim
-
That's an interesting idea. I'd like to see how that came out. I very much doubt that my printer (a cheap Hewlett-Packard) would do more than print the sheet in a red-oxidey shade with some bits left white as an impression of lettering, but that would probably be sufficient.
-
Thanks guys, for your kind words! To be honest, I was thinking of doing the underframes of the next batch - they're pretty easy to do - and then taking a break from IHAs and doing something else for a bit!
One thing that I forgot to put in the original post was that I haven't fitted the low-level lettering placards. I just couldn't see a way of adding them which would allow the wagon to get round any sort of curve. Even those ferry cleats are pushing it a bit, although it should handle about a 12" radius all right.
I also forgot to mention that the brake wheels are from the same TPM ferry wagon etch as the cleats etc. Because of the way I did the hood, I had to cut away part of the wheel and butt it up to the bottom of the filler.
Jim
-
Oh my God, they killed Clarabel!
-
Still loving the JMAs. Combining them with that particular mix of coil wagons that you mentioned (which is exactly the same as the one that I'm working towards), can I take it that your modelling interests lie somewhere in the Warrington-Liverpool area, maybe in 2002-ish?
Jim
-
Good job on this so far Jim. Any further progress to report?
cheers
Ben A.
In fact, there has been. I've finished the hood and detailed one of the ends, but I've been too busy to sit down and draft any deathless prose. I'm away from home at the moment, looking after my Ma, who's just come out of hospital; but once I get home I'm hoping to post an update and some photos pretty soon. I got hold of a couple of tippler underframes from Bernard Taylor, like you suggested: next job is to get them underway and start on the other three IHAs.
Jim
-
Very cool. Are you leaving the NP livery in place, or will you be daubing the logos out with whatever paint comes to hand, like EWS did after they bought the wagons?
Jim
-
I'm just guessing, but I don't think that you're treating the tagging system as seriously as you might.
Jim
-
That certainly looks a lot more like it. The 50s are my all-time favourite diesel class but I've never felt that the Farish model really caught the character of them properly.
I suppose it's too much to hope that you're going to paint it in large-logo blue, rather than NSE? LLB on a 50 is the finest loco / livery combination of my lifetime, in my view.
Jim
-
I have to admit that when I saw the first photo, I thought "how much must that thing weigh? He's made it out of breeze blocks!"
Jim
-
Will
Thanks for the kind words I'm going to try and do some of the other side so that rather than dipping between the supports, the hood bulges out slightly and comes back in towards the support. I think that's do-able. The other thing I'd like to try - if I could work out how to do it - is an effect like this, where there's a pronounced "pull" in the hood. I'm not sure that my filler-based method is that well-suited to it, though, because the filler can be a pain to work with. It might need something that can be "carved" more easily.
Jim
-
David
The train is great - I agree with Ben that some additional roof detailing would be worthwhile, but I take your point that it can be added at a later stage.
The base, though, is just insanely cool. I've never seen anything like that and it is brilliant.
Jim
GCR Class 18 Converted, Part I
in The GC and Met in OO
A blog by James Harrison in RMweb Blogs
Posted
A set of drawings for these locomotives and the class 18T altered (LNER classes J58 and J59) were published in Model Railway Constructor in December 1968. They were by C.A. Reddy, who did a lot of GCR locomotive drawings around that time.
Jim