Jump to content
 

Waukegan Harbor and Marine


Robatron86
 Share

Recommended Posts

So, I have thought about the car float over and over and over, almost to the brink of insanity, and it isn't inspiring me at all.

I don't know why.

And the roundhouse idea didn't do it for me really either.

So, I have been doing some more experimenting and have hit upon what I enjoy most, and that is inglenooks.

I present the latest idea, a full 5-3-3 inglenook, which have just spent the best part of an hour switching, and good god it was fun!

20170125_204703_HDR.jpg

20170126_215844.jpg

Sorry for all the dithering. I'm sure I will come back to the float one day.

Edited by Robatron86
  • Like 8
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium

So, I have thought about the car float over and over and over, almost to the brink of insanity, and it isn't inspiring me at all.

 

I don't know why.

 

And the roundhouse idea didn't do it for me really either.

 

So, I have been doing some more experimenting and have hit upon what I enjoy most, and that is inglenooks.

 

I present the latest idea, a full 5-3-3 inglenook, which have just spent the best part of an hour switching, and good god it was fun!

 

20170125_204703_HDR.jpg

 

20170126_215844.jpg

 

Sorry for all the dithering. I'm sure I will come back to the float one day.

i am starting to worry I have laid out an Inglenook Ok with a kick back siding as well but the ATSF is one of my four interchangeable groups of stock. The main difference is mine is my first DCC layout so it isn't wired and powered up yet and playing hasn't started. SOO, Conrail and WP and SP are the others.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ah good, the process begins again! I was wondering how long it would be before you started a new layout Rob!

 

Can't wait to see what you do with it. :)

 

P.s. Would it kill you to have a Southern boxcar adrift in that sea of ATSF? :P

Link to post
Share on other sites

i am starting to worry I have laid out an Inglenook Ok with a kick back siding as well but the ATSF is one of my four interchangeable groups of stock. The main difference is mine is my first DCC layout so it isn't wired and powered up yet and playing hasn't started. SOO, Conrail and WP and SP are the others.

Just stick with the Soo :yes: you know it makes sense :lol:

 

One thing about Inglenooks - they are often promoted as 'space savers' with the idea of shoe-horning them into very small spaces. Heck, I've done it myself!! But an Inglenook stretched out not only has the deceptively complex operating potential that belies the simplicity of tbe plan itself, it also has some real distance to make each move take up a fair bit of time, as well.

That's more or less the 'Mindheim Philosophy' - simple but fairly long track plans make for interesting operating, without the need for 'switching puzzles'. ;)

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I do wonder sometimes Jordan if you are on commission ;)

 

Well stretching out an inglenook is easy to do with NA stock. I was talking to a chap at the Guildford show and he had built an UK based inglenook with 4 wheel wagons. Obviously that could be fairly compact, but with our long and shiny boxcars (especially with 89 footers) you could stretch a simple inglenook out over quite a few feet. Well, five 89 ft cars is nearly 6 foot!

 

When I am running it properly, I will be running at scale speed, with correct pauses for switches to be set, brake tests, etc. How very Mindheim!

Edited by Robatron86
  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Come on man, even I have a Southern boxcar, and the flavour of the month on my trainset is Great Northern ;)

 

If I was building that layout, I would look at using some lovely long turnouts, probably #8s since those are easily sourced, and that makes a big difference to the appearance. I'd put the 5 road in the middle too and declare it the main, so you could (if and when space is available, eg at exhibitions) add staging on either end and run through trains as well as the switching fun.

What the hell, make it modular compatible too ;)

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I know, I should have some SP....

 

I had the points handy, code 100 medium left and a wye, found in a box in the loft.

 

The track is not fixed, so I could swap the the middle 3 and 5 over.

 

Using code 100 rules me out of playing with the Freemo boys....maybe you should build it ;)

Edited by Robatron86
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium

Dear aunty rob,

When I drained the bath this morning I found this car float thingy. Could you put a recess in the LH front of your board and stick it there, with a lead onto it?

Soapy Sam from Sault Sainte Superior.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dear aunty rob,

When I drained the bath this morning I found this car float thingy. Could you put a recess in the LH front of your board and stick it there, with a lead onto it?

Soapy Sam from Sault Sainte Superior.

Hi Soapy Sam,

 

I am going to leave the float in the bath...

Link to post
Share on other sites

I know, I should have some SP....

 

I had the points handy, code 100 medium left and a wye, found in a box in the loft.

 

The track is not fixed, so I could swap the the middle 3 and 5 over.

 

Using code 100 rules me out of playing with the Freemo boys....maybe you should build it ;)

Maybe I will... How big is the baseboard, actually?
Link to post
Share on other sites

Rob - What is the problem with the carfloat? - if you are building a carfloat layout, simply build it barse-ackwards - ie. the carfloat forms the sidings and the tail track forms the yard - possibly with a couple of dummy tracks to make it look busy. See http://www.rmweb.co.uk/forum/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=29306 and http://www.rmweb.co.uk/community/index.php?/topic/112913-ingleferry-wharf-went-to-a-further-exhibition/ Granted mine was a 3-2-2- but that was due to the constraints of the layout having to fit into the shoebox - a 5-3-3 should be no problem and it is fun to operate, not to mention the scenic possibilities with warehouses, containers and trucks, dock-workersers, food vans, etc.

Edited by shortliner
Link to post
Share on other sites

Rob - What is the problem with the carfloat? - if you are building a carfloat layout, simply build it barse-ackwards - ie. the carfloat forms the sidings and the tail track forms the yard - possibly with a couple of dummy tracks to make it look busy. See http://www.rmweb.co.uk/forum/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=29306 and

I know it seems simple, but I attacked the design over and over, and in my mind none of the designs really made me happy.

 

If I am being honest, using the Walthers kit as intended does require a lot of room, at least 2 reacher cars, plus a sizable fiddle yard and I think I would have had to extend the layout by another 3 feet.

 

If I had made my own float like you did, I could have made it my own and not had to use reacher cars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The 'problem' as I see it with a car float is the lack of realistic operating potential. In reality stock gets shoved on, and pulled off - that's it. It isn't a place for 'blocking' cars as in a normal yard; neither does it really have or need seperate 'car spots'. It's only real use is as an interesting scenic addition-come-fiddleyard. For operations, it's rather dull. Just IMHO. ;)

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

One possibility might be to forget the reach cars - The NYCHRR shipped its Alcos across the harbour on the car-float for refuelling and servicing, so, provided you ensure that the float is balanced, there is no reason that you cannot do the same - I realise that the fact that you will need turnouts will extend the layout, but I'd have thought one/they could be fitted on the float-bridge ,or one on the bridge and one in the yard before it, but I appreciate that you have the Walthers bits, and I don't.  :no:

Edited by shortliner
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Looks like a nice little project, Rob.

 

Having built a few inglenook type layouts myself, I do find them fun to operate. However,  I prefer using 3 turnouts to provide an additional spur to give more operational interest.

 

I'll be following with interest.

 

 

Mal  ..... (currently planning an Alcanman 2017 layout and can't stop thinking about including a run-around!  .. oh dear!)

 

ps  another vote for feet and inches from me!

Edited by Alcanman
  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

FWIW, what is currently "track-down" chez Shortliner,  is this  http://model-railroad-hobbyist.com/node/27661   -  http://model-railroad-hobbyist.com/node/28070  -  http://model-railroad-hobbyist.com/node/28444  ,  but there is also a "Thunk" going on regarding this, which I keep coming back to  http://iholmes.com/pages/journal/planning_06.html   Decisions! Decisions!! Decisions!!!

Edited by shortliner
  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...