Jump to content
 

Where did the Gas Turbine GT3 run in the early 1960s?


Tallpaul69
 Share

Recommended Posts

Hi All,

I have seen a photo of the GT3 hauling a parcels train through Wendover in the early 1960s.

 

Was this a regular run, and if so what duty was the return?

 

Did this loco also run on the GW&GC through High Wycombe in the same period?

 

Where else and on what duties was it used during 1960-3?

 

Many thanks

Paul

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Tallpaul69 said:

Hi All,

I have seen a photo of the GT3 hauling a parcels train through Wendover in the early 1960s.

 

Was this a regular run, and if so what duty was the return?

 

Did this loco also run on the GW&GC through High Wycombe in the same period?

 

Where else and on what duties was it used during 1960-3?

 

Many thanks

Paul

 

Not sure that the ' parcels train' was exactly that - far more likely to have been a test train composed of spare NPCCS stock.

 

I'm not sure, after all this time, if GT3 ever ran in revenue service  - I think not.

 

CJI.

  • Like 1
  • Agree 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold
55 minutes ago, cctransuk said:

 

Not sure that the ' parcels train' was exactly that - far more likely to have been a test train composed of spare NPCCS stock.

 

I'm not sure, after all this time, if GT3 ever ran in revenue service  - I think not.

 

CJI.

I don't think that ever would have run in revenue service.  it was not owned by BR although they provided a railway for it to run on and things for it to haul on trials and test workings but that would have been it.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium
1 hour ago, The Stationmaster said:

I don't think that ever would have run in revenue service.  it was not owned by BR although they provided a railway for it to run on and things for it to haul on trials and test workings but that would have been it.

There are quite a few photos of it with passenger coaches

One had the reporting mark 1Z79 and it had express passenger disc code. Another with ECS for Marylebone also with XP discs.

 

If ECS shouldn't 1Z79 be 5Z79? Or was it different back then?

  • Informative/Useful 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, melmerby said:

There are quite a few photos of it with passenger coaches

One had the reporting mark 1Z79 and it had express passenger disc code. Another with ECS for Marylebone also with XP discs.

 

If ECS shouldn't 1Z79 be 5Z79? Or was it different back then?

"3" was ECS back when the Train Reporting Number was first implemented and, IIRC, into the 1980s.

 

The first digit is more about according a train priority at the necessary points along its route than a hard and fast means of identifying the train type.

 

"Z" denotes a special working, regardless of train class. Railtours are frequently coded 1Zxx.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold
11 hours ago, melmerby said:

There are quite a few photos of it with passenger coaches

One had the reporting mark 1Z79 and it had express passenger disc code. Another with ECS for Marylebone also with XP discs.

 

If ECS shouldn't 1Z79 be 5Z79? Or was it different back then?

Yes but with masses of spare coaches lying around all over the place back then it was simple matter to put together a train of empties for test runs.  The fact that a train is conveying coaches doesn't mean that it's a passenger train.  Class 1 would have just about seen part of the loco's final year on test running and it would have sometimes run as a Class 1 for regulating reasons on certain test runs - Class 1 did not necessarily mean that it was a passenger train.

  • Like 1
  • Informative/Useful 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold
On 27/07/2022 at 18:18, BrushVeteran said:

I only ever saw it emerging from Finchley Road tunnel when I was temporally living back in London during 1961/2 period. I saw it on at least four occasions on parcels workings.

 

22 hours ago, johnb said:

Can't help much but I once saw it running through Pinner station on the Metropolitan. Looked very strange in that brown livery

I'm fascinated to know what it sounded like?

  • Agree 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold
20 hours ago, melmerby said:

 

If ECS shouldn't 1Z79 be 5Z79? Or was it different back then?

When I was working around Crewe in the Crewe Works test train, usually for EE locos from Vulcan Foundry, was 1T60. It was normally booked to run in express passenger timings and regulated accordingly.  A link to Rail-online for a picture someone took outside our window when I worked there.

https://www.rail-online.co.uk/p642814889/h14210285

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold
2 hours ago, rodent279 said:

 

I'm fascinated to know what it sounded like?


Stand close to a early jet liner at full bore, such as a B707, VC10, DH Trident and prepare to have the wax removed from your ears.  Now you have some idea.

  • Funny 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold
12 hours ago, jools1959 said:


Stand close to a early jet liner at full bore, such as a B707, VC10, DH Trident and prepare to have the wax removed from your ears.  Now you have some idea.

But GT3 didn't have jet pipe at the back end of the turbines so it wouldn't sound the same as a jet aircraft turbine.

 

Probably more akin to something like this -

 

 

 

or this

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Everyone,

Lacking any firm information that will go contrary to this idea, I plan to run my GT3 (when it arrives!) on my GW & GC Layout with two or three grubby NPC vehicles and an odd BSK passenger brake as a test train in any slot in my timetable that takes my fancy. I might even as a talking point run it tender first!

Best regards

Paul

Edited by Tallpaul69
mistype!!
  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, rodent279 said:

 

I'm fascinated to know what it sounded like?

Cannot recall how it sounded unfortunately. I was at street level and the loco up on the bridge immedaitely to the north of Pinner station, it wasn't moving all that fast.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold
8 hours ago, The Stationmaster said:

But GT3 didn't have jet pipe at the back end of the turbines so it wouldn't sound the same as a jet aircraft turbine.


It may have done but from some of my ex LT Neasden depot mates who were there in the early 60’s, it was LOUD 

  • Friendly/supportive 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold
24 minutes ago, MyRule1 said:

Just a wild idea but would it have sounded like the APT-E? That had gas turbine engines.


It had four smaller gas turbines in each power car and I believe BR was aware of the impact of noise, so tried to keep it out of the built up environment’s.

 

Remember that Union Pacific we’re huge advocate’s of gas turbine technology but kept them out in the barren wasteland’s of the mid-west because of the noise.  Another reason they ran with 2-3 diesel units behind, was as they approached big cities, they shut the turbine down and ran in on the diesel to avoid a fine for breaking that city’s noise abatement limits.

  • Interesting/Thought-provoking 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...