Jump to content
 

Peterborough North


great northern
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • RMweb Premium

The 1605 was very much a secondary service with portions and all mark 1s in the carriage workings apart from the RB, although I imagine the odd Gresley or Thonpson carriage would have stood in. The RB is shown as a standard Gresley teak, but I think this was the service which Clive Carter claimed had one if the more exotic buffets in his backtrack article (d.275 or 258 from memory - I’m away at the moment and can’t check).

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium
10 minutes ago, thegreenhowards said:

The 1605 was very much a secondary service with portions and all mark 1s in the carriage workings apart from the RB, although I imagine the odd Gresley or Thonpson carriage would have stood in. The RB is shown as a standard Gresley teak, but I think this was the service which Clive Carter claimed had one if the more exotic buffets in his backtrack article (d.275 or 258 from memory - I’m away at the moment and can’t check).

Dia 275 Andy. I just happened to have the article within easy reach.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium
4 minutes ago, great northern said:

Dia 275 Andy. I just happened to have the article within easy reach.

 

It’s a bit like a gospel isn’t it. Mine lives near my modelling bench. The wonders of ECML catering c.1958 - almost every train is different! 

 

I have had a pair of D.275 sides on order from Bill Bedford for quite a while now for my take on the train. 

 

 

  • Agree 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium
Just now, thegreenhowards said:

 

It’s a bit like a gospel isn’t it. Mine lives near my modelling bench. The wonders of ECML catering c.1958 - almost every train is different! 

 

I have had a pair of D.275 sides on order from Bill Bedford for quite a while now for my take on the train. 

 

 

I've just looked. He shows two sets of dia 275 sides. One is shown as available, and the other "work needed". I can't fathom out what the difference between the two may be.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium
12 hours ago, davidw said:

Any chance you can let me know the consist of the 4.05. Did it contain a triplet?

As promised David. It was as follows:-

 

BSO CK SK SK CK BSO BCK TSO SK RB FK BSK.

 

As Andy says, all are specified as MK1, except the buffet car.

 

According to the summer 58 book, the only West Riding trains containing a triplet were the 1020 Down, and the coresponding Up working at 5.33pm from Leeds.

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium
On 28/06/2019 at 21:34, jazzer said:

 

I just love this thread . Almost every picture has something memorable or fascinating

Prince Of Wales 60054 : fresh from the works with not just any old double chimney but a Kychap. At first the Kychap arrangement was patented and subject to a heavy licence  fee so at first only four A4's had them but they were so successful that once the patent expired all the A4's and A3's were retro fitted together with the Peppercorn Pacifics and I am pretty certain that the double chimneyed V2's were Kylchap fitted to give them extra performance on the heavy  Scottish freights. 

The greatest success was on the A3's though. Kychap exhausts were fitted to the A3's at a cost of around £230 , a sizeable sum in the late '50's but so successful were  they in improving both performance and economy  that the cost was quickly recovered . It was said that Kychap fitted A3's were never short of steam even with poor coal and a relatively inexperienced fireman and even though only rated 7P top shed used then interchangeably with 8P rated  A4's on all but the most prestigious Top Link duties. The secret of the Kychap exhaust was the way it mixed smokebox gasses more efficiently , using three separate nozzles , but the downside was that it reduced the blast, which in turn lead to the fitting of the German style smoke deflectors on the A3's which some think ruined their appearance but personally I think looks great. 

I hope this little digression is of interest to some but it brings be to  something I was unaware of. 

Until Gilberts caption I had no idea that some A3's were fitted with A4 boilers in later years which I suppose may well have been partly responsible for their improved performance when fitted together  with Kychap exhausts. So, first question, is there any difference in outward appearance to identify whether it is an A3 or A4 boiler? At a guess, after studying photos I imagine it might be something to do with the  taper from the firebox down the first half of the boiler,  but its not clear so can anyone enlighten me (and no doubt others) on this ?

Secondly, the dome.  In Gilberts picture  Prince of Wales has a banjo dome but other boilers had a round dome. Most A3's had boiler changes in there lives ( Flying Scotsman apparently had 15 boilers in all ) so almost all of them had banjo domes at some times and round domes at other times in their lives, as boilers changed.  So My question is what was hidden away in the banjo domes that wasn't in the traditional round domes and what was the point of them ? It couldn't have been anything desperately important otherwise they would all have been fitted with one type or the other. Anyone know the answer ?

 

P. Dantic.

 

EDIT : Its actually Kylchap , not Kychap but my spell check is rather argumentative !

I've now had time to get some more detail on these queries. The easy one first:-

 

According to Peter Coster in the Book of the A3 Pacifics, there were two differences which identified the Dia 107 boilers. The easy one is the firebox inspection doors, which are level on a Dia 94, but inclined upwards toward the cab on a Dia 107. That's what I always look for. Also on a 107 the dome sat slightly further forward, but Coster says that it is difficult to see that difference.

 

As to types of dome, the original  A1s had a round dome to dia 94. When the A3s appeared they had a perforated steam collector, which came to be known as a banjo dome. If Tony Wright looks in on this, he can tell you more about the (mis)use of the term "banjo". These boilers were to Dia 94A, and were eventually fitted to the whole class by BR times I believe. However, our old friend Edward Thompson apparently preferred the appearance of the simple dome, and ordered nine more, to Dia 94HP.  Dia 107 started to be used in late 1954, so in later years there were three types, mainly 94A, just those nine 94HP, and a gradually increasing number of 107. They were interchanged at general overhaul, so it is essential to use Yeadon plus reliably dated pictures if one can find them when choosing what to model.

  • Informative/Useful 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, great northern said:

As promised David. It was as follows:-

 

BSO CK SK SK CK BSO BCK TSO SK RB FK BSK.

 

As Andy says, all are specified as MK1, except the buffet car.

 

According to the summer 58 book, the only West Riding trains containing a triplet were the 1020 Down, and the coresponding Up working at 5.33pm from Leeds.

What and unusual mix!

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, great northern said:

I've now had time to get some more detail on these queries. The easy one first:-

 

According to Peter Coster in the Book of the A3 Pacifics, there were two differences which identified the Dia 107 boilers. The easy one is the firebox inspection doors, which are level on a Dia 94, but inclined upwards toward the cab on a Dia 107. That's what I always look for. Also on a 107 the dome sat slightly further forward, but Coster says that it is difficult to see that difference.

 

As to types of dome, the original  A1s had a round dome to dia 94. When the A3s appeared they had a perforated steam collector, which came to be known as a banjo dome. If Tony Wright looks in on this, he can tell you more about the (mis)use of the term "banjo". These boilers were to Dia 94A, and were eventually fitted to the whole class by BR times I believe. However, our old friend Edward Thompson apparently preferred the appearance of the simple dome, and ordered nine more, to Dia 94HP.  Dia 107 started to be used in late 1954, so in later years there were three types, mainly 94A, just those nine 94HP, and a gradually increasing number of 107. They were interchanged at general overhaul, so it is essential to use Yeadon plus reliably dated pictures if one can find them when choosing what to model.

Quite right, Gilbert,

 

I do look in from time to time............

 

The only LNER locomotives fitted with 'banjo' domes* were the last batch of A3s built - WINDSOR LAD to FIRDAUSSI; then (probably) only up to their first boiler change, when (if a 94A boiler were refitted) they received 'streamlined' domes.

 

What was underneath was a perforated steam collector, as fitted to the A4s, the V2s, the P2s, the four A2/1s, the rebuilt A2/2s and all Peppercorn's Pacifics as built. Most (if not all) other Thompson Pacifics got one; eventually. The device was better than a plain dome in that it limited 'surging' - water going into the dome. 

 

Beware the 'Bibles'. Yeadon gets it a bit wrong, Coster muddles up most dome descriptions, as does the RCTS. 

 

Beware even more the drawings - Roche, Skinley, Beattie and others. 'Banjo' domes appear all over the place. 

 

Regarding A3s with A4 boilers, I'm friendly with David Somers (son of Jack Somers, one time shedmaster at New England). The first time 35A got to know that A3s were being fitted with A4 boilers was when re-tubing a boiler, they found the new ones were too long! 

 

* the two V4s had a 'sort of' 'banjo' dome. 

 

Regards,

 

Tony.

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
  • Informative/Useful 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium
5 hours ago, Tony Wright said:

Quite right, Gilbert,

 

I do look in from time to time............

 

The only LNER locomotives fitted with 'banjo' domes* were the last batch of A3s built - WINDSOR LAD to FIRDAUSSI; then (probably) only up to their first boiler change, when (if a 94A boiler were refitted) they received 'streamlined' domes.

 

What was underneath was a perforated steam collector, as fitted to the A4s, the V2s, the P2s, the four A2/1s, the rebuilt A2/2s and all Peppercorn's Pacifics as built. Most (if not all) other Thompson Pacifics got one; eventually. The device was better than a plain dome in that it limited 'surging' - water going into the dome. 

 

Beware the 'Bibles'. Yeadon gets it a bit wrong, Coster muddles up most dome descriptions, as does the RCTS. 

 

Beware even more the drawings - Roche, Skinley, Beattie and others. 'Banjo' domes appear all over the place. 

 

Regarding A3s with A4 boilers, I'm friendly with David Somers (son of Jack Somers, one time shedmaster at New England). The first time 35A got to know that A3s were being fitted with A4 boilers was when re-tubing a boiler, they found the new ones were too long! 

 

* the two V4s had a 'sort of' 'banjo' dome. 

 

Regards,

 

Tony.

I knew I could rely on you Tony. You've explained it to me before, but of course I forgot.

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium
1 hour ago, great northern said:

Tonight we see D201 starting away towards London, perhaps with the crew being trained already thinking that the comfort of the diesel cab is a good place to be. They won't though when they find out that a good Pacific can beat it every time. I shall leave Clive to supply the appropriate accompanying noises.

 

 

 

I can look up "Whistle while you work" on You Tube if you want Gilbert. :whistle:

  • Funny 7
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold

That last shot really shows how well those new sidings frame the picture, just lovely.

 

I do like the O2 as well, such a workhorse looking loco.

 

Cheers
Tony

  • Like 1
  • Agree 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

On 30/06/2019 at 21:40, great northern said:

Tonight we see D201 starting away towards London, perhaps with the crew being trained already thinking that the comfort of the diesel cab is a good place to be. They won't though when they find out that a good Pacific can beat it every time. I shall leave Clive to supply the appropriate accompanying noises.

 

 

1403992351_7201leaving.JPG.a4d63859dcf4be6e5d409a9c5751ee38.JPG

 

Hard on modernisation's heels came some more coal.

 

 

356001722_8morecoal.JPG.0e913ad4bfb9f6d1283717c4dac0e898.JPG

 

 

 

 

O.S. Nock would certainly concur with your assessment of an A4 over a class 40. According to him the 2450 drawbar horsepower that he recorded by Mallard pulling 415 tons gross at 80 mph UP Stoke Bank in 1963, was a1000dhp more than the type 4 things could deliver. 

  • Informative/Useful 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...