RMweb Premium skipepsi Posted September 29, 2011 RMweb Premium Share Posted September 29, 2011 As it says on the tin really, prompted by a look at the jokes being stopped as this part of the forum is banned by the county council. Are the jokes that bad? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coldgunner Posted September 29, 2011 Share Posted September 29, 2011 I can understand the likes of Facebook being blocked as they are like black holes, people get sucked in. At my old work stuff like tech forums were blocked as well as Ebay. Lastly Hotmail was blocked too, but oddly enough live.com wasn't lol. You'll probably find your work uses a blocking system based on points, if a site contains certain content its given points and if a page exceeds a certain amount it will be blocked. Try again another day, you may find it will then work. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Talltim Posted September 29, 2011 Share Posted September 29, 2011 What I decide is blocked is blocked Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted September 29, 2011 Share Posted September 29, 2011 We're not allowed to look at amazon.com during work hours. However we can stare at amazon.co.uk all day long. Hooray for US-centric censorship Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold The Stationmaster Posted September 29, 2011 RMweb Gold Share Posted September 29, 2011 When they started putting internet access on our computers at work in the late 1990s I asked the IT Dept why it was being done as for most people it was totally unnecessary. they said it was to allow email but they couldn't explain why apart from saying that the ex BR Micromail system (which we used very heavily) was 'too expensive'. In retrospect I wonder if the staff time lost surfing the 'net by people who don't actually need internet access to do their work has ended up costing more than was saved by ditching Micromail for those who did use together with the added cost of physically transferring files which are too big for email but could be handled with ease by Micromail? Mind you as long as it does come out of my pension why should I still worry about it? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold beast66606 Posted September 29, 2011 RMweb Gold Share Posted September 29, 2011 More modern proxys - and forward thinking companies perhaps - will allow the user (IP address or user based) to surf most (ie non dodgy) sites for a maximum of say, 60 minutes, per day, accepting that people will always do it so limit rather than ban is preferred Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold John B Posted September 29, 2011 RMweb Gold Share Posted September 29, 2011 Current client is in the High-Tech sector (storage & data security). They ban: All personal email (Gmail, yahoo, msn etc) Any other company mail (my own company's secure email server, for example) Farcebook All photo storage (Flickr etc) Any pop-ups, or external banner ads (yay!) LinkedIn Narrow Gauge Railway Modelling Online They allow: RMWeb BBC Sport eBay Twitter (with Beast's "60 minute usage warning") FRMW Hattons Blogspot & Wordpress blogs Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium skipepsi Posted September 29, 2011 Author RMweb Premium Share Posted September 29, 2011 Mind you as long as it does? come out of my pension why should I still worry about it? I suspect it already has. The thing that struck me was RMWEB is allowed but the jokes were not. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
PLD Posted September 29, 2011 Share Posted September 29, 2011 (edited) As we (NHS) are dealing with a lot of sensitive data, the filtering is as much about stopping that data getting out into the wrong hands as it is about stopping time-wasting. Therefore virtually all sites where data could potentially be uploaded to or sent insecurely (all 'social networking' sites, file sharing sites, 'cloud' storage sites, U-tube and similar, most Web-Mail sites and many photo sharing sites) are blocked. There are also cases of sites which we can access but certain functionality is restricted; such as most newspaper sites and bloging sites we can view/read but can't add comments or upload files, some forums we can read but not sign-in, and many shopping sites (including thetrainline.com and Hattons as I recently found ) we can browse but not purchase ... The capability does exist to grant individual users access to specified sites - prime example is our sexual health team having access to some sites that most reasonable people would not even dare visiting on company time for perfectly ligitimate research! Edited September 29, 2011 by PLD Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Removed a/c Posted September 29, 2011 Share Posted September 29, 2011 I have access to every single website, well I do work for an Internet provider.......we call it research Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold beast66606 Posted September 29, 2011 RMweb Gold Share Posted September 29, 2011 As we (NHS) are dealing with a lot of sensitive data, the filtering is as much about stopping that data getting out into the wrong hands as it is about stopping time-wasting. Therefore virtually all sites where data could potentially be uploaded to or sent insecurely (all 'social networking' sites, file sharing sites, 'cloud' storage sites, U-tube and similar, most Web-Mail sites and many photo sharing sites) are blocked. I'd be more concerned about what Doctors and Consultants take home on their laptops if I were you Paul ... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Southernman46 Posted September 29, 2011 Share Posted September 29, 2011 I start with Amey soon and as long as RMweb / eBay / Hattons / MRD are allowed then I'll be happy. The GW main line runs past my window so plenty of entertainment there too Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mod5 Posted September 29, 2011 Share Posted September 29, 2011 If it was that bad in the jokes it would be removed. We do check them you know. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Q Posted September 29, 2011 Share Posted September 29, 2011 At the company I work at, at tea break and lunch, you can look at (offically) anything that is politically correct, ie no porn, racist sites/ jokes etc. but it isn't actually blocked in anyway.. The Q Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JeremyC Posted September 29, 2011 Share Posted September 29, 2011 At one point we had the curious situation where our own department's website was blocked. Jeremy Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AndrewC Posted September 30, 2011 Share Posted September 30, 2011 Depends on which client site I'm on. Some are wide open. Others vary. A few of the real secret squirrel ones have no external web access and my mobile goes into a sealed envelope when I arrive for the day. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Max Stafford Posted September 30, 2011 Share Posted September 30, 2011 If it was that bad in the jokes it would be removed. We do check them you know. Aye, but only after you've had a good laugh at them! Dave. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Horsetan Posted September 30, 2011 Share Posted September 30, 2011 .....The thing that struck me was RMWEB is allowed but the jokes were not. Maybe they thought RMWeb as a whole was a sufficient joke? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium Gwiwer Posted September 30, 2011 RMweb Premium Share Posted September 30, 2011 (edited) Blocked by default: All proxy sites such as Proxify All personal email sites All social networking sites Some national eBay sites including the US ABC Australia news service (but no others - no explanation offered) All "live" chat and similar services All "adult" sites or pages Links to the above embedded within permitted sites Blocked on an individual basis usually based on excessive time logged on to a non-work site or arising from a manager's request due to poor work performance: Any and all sites or pages specifically requested to have a ban applied in respect of named individual(s) up to and including a full ban on internet use (only Company intranet pages would remain) Not blocked except as above: Hobby and leisure forums except for "real time" chat functions Most eBay national sites News (except ABC Australia for reasons not made known) and weather sites worldwide Non work-related sites where "fair use" may be reasonable such as banking and personal (including hobby) shopping sites For all non-work activity a "fair use policy" applies. Limited use may be made of the internet and only in non-work time such as rostered breaks. "Limited" is not specifically defined. Permitted without restriction: Access to sites which support the work task but are not internal Company pages such as Google Maps and those of competitor businesses in the same field. All pages under the direct control of work via the intranet but only on a "need to know" basis. Accessing areas not required and which may contain sensitive or confidential detail can be a dismissal offence. Edited September 30, 2011 by Gwiwer Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium Welly Posted September 30, 2011 RMweb Premium Share Posted September 30, 2011 (edited) I can get RMWeb OK ( yet it downloads like porridge through straw on my workplace network! ) but not ebay. I couldn't care less about Tw@tter or Farcebook which are blocked anyway. Edited September 30, 2011 by Welly Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted September 30, 2011 Share Posted September 30, 2011 All pages under the direct control of work via the intranet but only on a "need to know" basis. Accessing areas not required and which may contain sensitive or confidential detail can be a dismissal offence. Surely it shouldn't be _possible_ to access confidential data you're not allowed to see? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tim V Posted September 30, 2011 Share Posted September 30, 2011 RMweb is blocked, however, I spend too much time on that already - so it's no great loss. After all, the world isn't going to stop if I don't reply..... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium Gwiwer Posted September 30, 2011 RMweb Premium Share Posted September 30, 2011 Surely it shouldn't be _possible_ to access confidential data you're not allowed to see? Customer's personal information is held and managed in accordance with our Privacy Act and data protection legislation. How those records are viewed and used depends upon ones' position in the organisation. In my area we cannot access a large part of the financial transaction history as we don't need to do so. The provisions are there in case someone decides they know better and attempts to (or succeeds in) gaining access to the details they don't need by what ever means. It is also possible, in theory, to hack into commercially sensitive business information which is not normally available to us and there is a written process in place to cover any such attempt. The words Summary Dismissal are writ large and in bold. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danemouth Posted October 1, 2011 Share Posted October 1, 2011 Customer's personal information is held and managed in accordance with our Privacy Act and data protection legislation. How those records are viewed and used depends upon ones' position in the organisation. In my area we cannot access a large part of the financial transaction history as we don't need to do so. The provisions are there in case someone decides they know better and attempts to (or succeeds in) gaining access to the details they don't need by what ever means. It is also possible, in theory, to hack into commercially sensitive business information which is not normally available to us and there is a written process in place to cover any such attempt. The words Summary Dismissal are writ large and in bold. Viewing data you are not entitled to see also constitutes an offence under the Computer Misuse Act 1990 Dave Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium Gwiwer Posted October 1, 2011 RMweb Premium Share Posted October 1, 2011 Legislation differs between nations. That's not one we have here. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now