CullingworthGNR Posted December 2, 2009 Share Posted December 2, 2009 We had a few threads on this topic on the old forum, I thought it worthwhile discussing the merits of AC (or DC) overhead layouts on the new facility. The classes left to be released (to superdetail / flywheel motor spec) are the following - Class 73 Class 76 Class 77 Class 81 Class 82 Class 83 Class 84 Class 85 Class 86 Class 87 Class 89 Class 90 Class 91 Class 92 Does anyone know how strongly the Hornby 87 has been selling? I haven't seen it in any bargain bins (unlike the 86) so I presume it has done reasonably well. Looking to build a new loft layout with some of that Electrotren catenary (very well priced and with a bit of adjustment looks ok for UK use). Hopefully I'll be able to populate it with top-spec electric locos in a couple of years! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold Burkitt Posted December 2, 2009 RMweb Gold Share Posted December 2, 2009 This thread might as well have been titled "UK Electrics, 4mm, what isn't left to produce?" Seeing as that would be a rather shorter list: 1)Heljan class 86 2)er 3)that's it. Hopefully they'll follow it up with an 87, which given the similarities between the classes seems almost certain given sufficient sales, and who knows where they'll go from there. There was speculation a while ago that the NRM might commission a 76 to follow on from their prototype Deltic, but the probable upcoming City of Truro announcement has scotched that for the moment. Though if it is from the NRM, it would show they are committed to expanding their range of models, so perhaps the 77 might be further down the list... Interestingly the list of EMU classes available or in the works as modern high-spec models is actually longer than for electric locos 373 Eurostar (Hornby) 390 Pendolino (Hornby) 395 Javelin (Hornby) 411 4-CEP (Bachmann) 416 2-EPB (Bachmann) 462 Networker (Hornby) Though the list of EMUs still to be done is even longer than for electric locos - I won't list them all as it would stretch on a bit! Paul Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
'CHARD Posted December 2, 2009 Share Posted December 2, 2009 To be pedantic, Hornby do the somewhat less useful sister to the 465, the 2-car 466. Also, from the locos, 71 and 74 are missing. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold Burkitt Posted December 2, 2009 RMweb Gold Share Posted December 2, 2009 To be pedantic, Hornby do the somewhat less useful sister to the 465, the 2-car 466. Pedantry noted and error duly corrected. Thanks Chard. Paul Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold Dagworth Posted December 2, 2009 RMweb Gold Share Posted December 2, 2009 We had a few threads on this topic on the old forum, I thought it worthwhile discussing the merits of AC (or DC) overhead layouts on the new facility. The classes left to be released (to superdetail / flywheel motor spec) are the following - Class 73 Class 76 Class 77 Class 81 Class 82 Class 83 Class 84 Class 85 Class 86 Class 87 Class 89 Class 90 Class 91 Class 92 Only the Heljan 86 fits the superdetail / flywheel motor spec, but look at it from the other end, of the list here the only ones that have never been done RTR at all are 82, 83, 84 and 85. Sods law says that the moment I fish my scratch 85 then someone will announce one. Once Heljan have the 86 it's a pretty short step to the 87, then they've got the bogies for the 90.... Andi Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
coachmann Posted December 2, 2009 Share Posted December 2, 2009 I painted a proprietary an AC electric loco in the 1990's for a job. Who produced it....Hornby? It was very attractive. Speaking as a fully paid up kettleman, I'de buy a good Class 83, the smartest thing on AC rails, just to look at. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
298 Posted December 2, 2009 Share Posted December 2, 2009 I painted a proprietary an AC electric loco in the 1990's for a job. Who produced it....Hornby? It was very attractive. Speaking as a fully paid up kettleman, I'de buy a good Class 83, the smartest thing on AC rails, just to look at. Sssshhh, you'll dispell the myth that the first generation AC's (81-85) all look the same. It's interesting looking over the insides of the classes as I have has the opportunity to do, although the works designers had to follow certain styling guidelines, their design team influences on the inside are quite noticeable. The 82 is the most like a steam loco...!! If they had been given a free reign, would the 83 have looked like a Baby Deltic, or the 84 like a class 22...? Personally, i'm a class 84 fan, but they're tricky to model. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Max Stafford Posted December 2, 2009 Share Posted December 2, 2009 Any of the early ACs would be nice. Like Larry, I like the 83s although the 84s are my favourites. But being Glasgow built, I would say that, wouldn't I...? ;-) Dave. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
coachmann Posted December 2, 2009 Share Posted December 2, 2009 The 83's were unique really with their chunky bogies and double relief battery boxes. I managed to photograph just one of them towards the end working parcels. LG Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wolf27 Posted December 2, 2009 Share Posted December 2, 2009 I personally think that if the Heljan 86 is a success in both sales and appearance, that logically they would go for the 87 and 90 as these would have a wider appeal. Would love to see the earlier locos produced but doubt that they will appear for at least 5-10 years, then it would most likely be an 81 or 85. It would be nice to have an 83 and 84 as I think these had the most character but thats my opinion. On the subject of sales I doubt that this is the main factor in deciding what should be produced as whatever is released is always going to sell initially. Heljan dont seem to have suffered through their speculative ventures yet, and as long as they continue to be a success there will always be hope thet they will come up with the goods in time. Meanwhile I shall continue with doing some proper modelling and make my own. cheers shane Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium pete_mcfarlane Posted December 2, 2009 RMweb Premium Share Posted December 2, 2009 Also, from the locos, 71 and 74 are missing. Also missing is the class 70, and to be really pedantic, the class 80, the Eurotunnel Bo-Bo-Bos and the various NER designs. I also suspect that a model of the Metropolitan Metro-Vick Bo-Bo would sell quite well if somebody did one. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Phil Posted December 2, 2009 Share Posted December 2, 2009 I personally think that if the Heljan 86 is a success in both sales and appearance, that logically they would go for the 87 and 90 as these would have a wider appeal. Would love to see the earlier locos produced but doubt that they will appear for at least 5-10 years, then it would most likely be an 81 or 85. It would be nice to have an 83 and 84 as I think these had the most character but thats my opinion. shane This has got me thinking. Wonder if an enterprising "cottage engineer" will produce some resin ends suitable for converting the Heljan 86 into an 87. Apart from bogies and some of the underframe detail (such as vacuum exhausters), I believe the main bodyshell and cabs is structurally very similar. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wolf27 Posted December 3, 2009 Share Posted December 3, 2009 It wouldn't be worth the effort to make new ends in resin. I have used the Hornby 86 body to make an 87 and its not to difficult. As you say there is also the bogies and underframe to correct. cheers Shane Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bloodnok Posted December 3, 2009 Share Posted December 3, 2009 It wouldn't be worth the effort to make new ends in resin. I have used the Hornby 86 body to make an 87 and its not to difficult. As you say there is also the bogies and underframe to correct. Though as I understand it, the critical dimensions (bogie wheelbase, bogie centres) are all identical - so the chassis block drive train and axles are all directly reusable, all that's needed is new cosmetic sideframes and underframe moulding. This is something that should Heljan choose not to make a class 87 themselves, an enterprising supplier could make... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CullingworthGNR Posted December 4, 2009 Author Share Posted December 4, 2009 Can any retailers shed any light on the sales of the Hornby 87, and even the Electrotren catenary? Given that they're not in bargain bins, I'd assume that they're fairly strong, or at least that they're carrying on with those lines. Along with the DVT, we'll possibly see a Virgin liveried 87 in 2010? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pete the Elaner Posted December 14, 2009 Share Posted December 14, 2009 I think there is a bigger hole in the market for AC EMUs. I know some of the more glamorous ones are available like Pendolino & Javelin, but the more common ones are not represented at all. Many of these share bodyshells with DC EMU's or DMU's...some of which are even currently available. WIth minimal re-tooling, I am sure these can be produced without too much trouble. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marcyg Posted December 16, 2009 Share Posted December 16, 2009 I think there is a bigger hole in the market for AC EMUs. I know some of the more glamorous ones are available like Pendolino & Javelin, but the more common ones are not represented at all. Many of these share bodyshells with DC EMU's or DMU's...some of which are even currently available. WIth minimal re-tooling, I am sure these can be produced without too much trouble. Agreed. The 319, 317 would be a huge boost, and Hornby releasing intermediate cars to make a 365 (Iknow it wouldn't be perfect) would be great too. Maybe Heljan releasing the 86 will spur a new interest in AC equipment Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.