Jump to content
Users will currently see a stripped down version of the site until an advertising issue is fixed. If you are seeing any suspect adverts please go to the bottom of the page and click on Themes and select IPS Default. ×
RMweb
 

Black Country Blues


Indomitable026

Recommended Posts

Works Traffic

 

The fictional history of Trafalgar works has it, by 1971, as a rod and bar mill and light section mill re-rolling billets supplied from Lackenby and Scunthorpe.

 

Traffic in would be 4” x 4” steel billets.  These would have slightly rounded corners so any suitable styrene section would be suitable.  Tamiya used to do a 3mm x 3mm square section rod which would be ideal if still available.

 

Traffic out would be light sections;  solid rounds and rectangles from the bar mill and  I, C, H, L and narrow, flat, sections up to about 8” max in a single dimension, from the section mill.   A small mill like this might also roll quite complex special sections and Bulb sections but in 4mm they’re going to be difficult to model and the differences hardly visible anyway.

 

No plate, the only plate roller in the Black Country was Patent Shaft who had a small plate mill, max. width 2250mm, and small mills, like Trafalgar, would have specialised, they wouldn’t roll plate and small sections.

 

 

Colour & Texture

 

Both traffic in and out is hot rolled, so has a relatively coarse surface finish and therefore a matt finish.  Cold rolling is used to give the highest quality surface finish e.g. on steel sheet.

 

For the load on the Guy, I used Humbrol Metalcote ‘Polished Steel’.  It shouldn’t be polished, though I did draw it once through a dry rag just to impart a slight sheen to the narrow edges.  It naturally dries to a nice matt, blue/grey colour.

 

I did try ‘Gunmetal’ Metalcote, but it’s too black, the Polished Steel is just right.

 

As for length, I’d make the billets either 30’ or 40’ long.

 

Sections out,  again 30’ was a widely used length, but make some variety, cutting to length was a simple procedure; whatever the customer wanted, or was prepared to handle.

 

Clearly, passing traffic could encompass anything.

 

 

 

Mark, I'm happy to put together a few loads, I'll wait until you post your requirements

Edited by Arthur
  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Snip!

 

Traffic in would be 4” x 4” steel billets.  These would have slightly rounded corners so any suitable styrene section would be suitable.  Tamiya used to do a 3mm x 3mm square section rod which would be ideal if still available.

 

Snip!

 

Arthur, 4" = 1.33mm in 1:76, or 3mm would be 9" ??

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A Ha, spotted the deliberate (Not!!) mistake.  You are of course correct, my error.

 

Now, if Tamiya did 1.3 mm square rods we'd be there....

I wonder if such relatively small-section rods would give the right impression. My recollection of trains of 4" bar, slowly passing Old Castle crossing at the start of their journey to the Midlands, is of fairly chunky pieces of steel, loaded in such a fashion that they looked almost like one solid piece. Might it produce a better looking result to have some longitudinally-scribed pieces of plastic sheet of the appropriate thickness?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This might be of some use, wagons loaded with sections at Dorman Longs Lackenby works on Teesside in 1966.  These are generally larger sections than Trafalgar would handle, most are probably off the Universal Beam Mill, a very expensive bit of plant, Cargo Fleets cost £4 million in 1962.

 

post-6861-0-38456600-1358878124_thumb.jpg

 

To give a bit more scope for modelling these sections, the mill could produce sections up to 1ft (4mm, I believe!!) and flat strip up to 18" (6mm).

Edited by Arthur
  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold

A Ha, spotted the deliberate (Not!!) mistake.  You are of course correct, my error.

 

Now, if Tamiya did 1.3 mm square rods we'd be there....

Or if somebody did 50 thou square stock.

 

Such as North Eastern scale lumber #NE3030 .048" X .048". Available from P & H.

Near enough?

 

Mike.

Edited by Enterprisingwestern
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree Chris, that one looks nicely different from the norm, the base does look a little modern though, probably all that safety railing round the ladders!

I installed a water treatment tower as part of our (Derby) factory expansion in 1968/9. The access ladders were fitted with the safety hoops.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quick posting today, here's the painted footplate, wasp striping is next;

 

post-6861-0-05426400-1358885316_thumb.jpg

 

The body, with it's adjusted rain strips, has had it's yellow coat and is being allowed to dry.

 

Next update will be Thursday.

 

TBC

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium

The building has now arrived at Chez Spams...here it is prior to the setting in (in purposefully made to socket a little on the small side to take account of the ins and outs etc)

 

post-6675-0-15163900-1358885879_thumb.jpg

 

post-6675-0-14059400-1358885902_thumb.jpg

 

post-6675-0-98531900-1358885926_thumb.jpg

 

post-6675-0-39484900-1358885981_thumb.jpg

 

post-6675-0-43332600-1358885954_thumb.jpg

 

Well done Stu...

 

 

  • Like 19
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium

Right, thanks for the additional info an offers of help.

 

For our bolster fleet we'll initially be using (mainly) twin bolsters and bogie bolster Cs (to be supplemented by (longer) Bogie Bolster Ds and (shorter) Bogie Bolster Es as/when time allows).

 

The bolsters on the twin bolsters will accept a load of up to 22mm wide to a maximum length of 145mm (approx 36').  The bogie bolster Cs will support a load of either 16mm or 30mm depending on where we place the stanchions and up to a maximum length of 180mm (45').

 

My initial thoughts on material would be to use something like 2mm or 3.2mm I or H section, plus the square strip which Mike and Paul suggest above.  One concern however is that those which I've made before have bowed slightly so no longer sit flat on the bolsters thoughts on how to prevent this would be appreciated.

 

As ever, Paul Bartlett's website provides all the prototype inspiration we might need, such as:

http://paulbartlett.zenfolio.com/brbco/h18bb9dd#h12f45402

http://paulbartlett.zenfolio.com/brbco/h18bb9dd#he085936

http://paulbartlett.zenfolio.com/brbco/h18bb9dd#hdfd549e

http://paulbartlett.zenfolio.com/brbco/h18bb9dd#h17e46b00

http://paulbartlett.zenfolio.com/brbcv/h4eed9c50#h63ac521

http://paulbartlett.zenfolio.com/brbcv/h4eed9c50#h26cdea6

http://paulbartlett.zenfolio.com/brbcv/h4eed9c50#h1efc92f9

 

A more unusual shaped section:

http://paulbartlett.zenfolio.com/brbco/h18bb9dd#h12f45402

 

In our period I gather our the loads would (mainly) be chained rather than strapped.  However, we need the loads to be removable to swap between inbound and outbound loads - so I need to give some thought to how we represent the chains.

 

Cheers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium

Bolster uprights (stanchions) were normally movable across the width of the wagon; one BR diagram showed all the potential positions and spacings, which Lima took at face value when doing the Bolster E..Instead of two stanchions per bolster, there were a dozen or so, with no space for the load.

i'd never thought about that being the reason behind the Lima bolsters with all those stanchions :good:

Another 'metals' traffic which hasn't been mentioned yet was Pig Iron for the many foundries in the area; this might be conveyed in the specialist wagons built for it, or in Plate wagons. It could be represented by bits of sprue offcuts- a search for 'Pensnett' might produce photos of it.

Some Plates loaded with pig iron here:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/richard_davies_collection/6531212441/

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium

Looks good on-site, nicely done Stubby! 

 

Quite a large model, but on site it emphasises and makes one realise the size of the BCB project.

 

Yup, it's a monster, emphasised now buildings are arriving. Stu's building is a not so small 415 x 100mm and is dwarfed by the surroundings.

 

It's now planted.

 

A few minor adjustments...

post-6675-0-49054200-1358888743_thumb.jpg

 

And it's in...

post-6675-0-81759900-1358888705_thumb.jpg

 

post-6675-0-64554200-1358888719_thumb.jpg

 

post-6675-0-58989700-1358888761_thumb.jpg

 

post-6675-0-66458900-1358888778_thumb.jpg

 

post-6675-0-47154800-1358888790_thumb.jpg

 

post-6675-0-93513200-1358888814_thumb.jpg

 

post-6675-0-10359700-1358888831_thumb.jpg

 

 

Footpath to add next!

  • Like 17
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...