Mark Pelham Posted December 9, 2012 Share Posted December 9, 2012 Good Afternoon, I am thinking of modelling a WCML Mark 3 set with a failed Class 90 being hauled by a Class 57. The DVT will be visible at the rear so my main question is would the DVT need a tail lamp or could the Class 57 provide power for the normal tail lighting? Would it depend on the extent of the defect with the 90 as to whether the pantograph could remain raised for electrical train supply or would it have to be lowered as a standard practice? Thanks in advance, Mark Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
6Y99 Posted December 9, 2012 Share Posted December 9, 2012 The train would require a tail lamp as the BIS on the loco would be switched out if the train is being dragged then its pantograph would be down and secured Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold beast66606 Posted December 9, 2012 RMweb Gold Share Posted December 9, 2012 Tail lamp imho Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marcyg Posted December 9, 2012 Share Posted December 9, 2012 Definatly a tail lamp. Just been watching a video that happens to have a drag on it and the trail definalty had a seperate tail lamp Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tim Horn Posted December 9, 2012 Share Posted December 9, 2012 I know it's not wcml, but this surprised me when checking my photos for a pic to help 47714 & 86223 TJH17 Whitlingham Junction 2nd August 2003 Copyright Tim Horn by Tim Horn, on Flickr I would say tail lamp as well, but why both on this one? Cheers, Tim Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
45125 Posted December 9, 2012 Share Posted December 9, 2012 As the DVT would be trailing a tail lamp wouldn't be required. The in built tail light is sufficent, howver if the 90 iis trailing the BIS would be out and a tail lamp would be required. The only time a tail lamp would be required on the DVT in this situation when trailing would be if the batteries were u/s. Al Taylor. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
45125 Posted December 9, 2012 Share Posted December 9, 2012 The tail lights are both lit as this is the current requirement, ie lamp failure. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold big jim Posted December 9, 2012 RMweb Gold Share Posted December 9, 2012 I agree with 45125s post above, the batteries on the DVT should be sufficiant to power the tail lights even with the pantograph is down on the 90 The battery switch on the DVT has 3 positions, normal, isolated and off, NORMAL is as it says the normal position when running which allows power to everything, ISOLATED position will leave the tail lights lit running via the batteries and the OFF position switches everything off which is when you will need a tail light Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Supaned Posted December 9, 2012 Share Posted December 9, 2012 also consider that if the diesel doing the dragging provides electric train heat then the DVT batteries should charge via this supply. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark Pelham Posted December 10, 2012 Author Share Posted December 10, 2012 Thanks for all your replies, I think I will go with just the DVT lights as it will be easier to just fit a function decoder rather than deactivating the tail lights and installing a tail lamp. Thanks Tim for the photo, it is the first I have seen of the rear of a failed train but I guess most people who take photos are more interested in what's at the front! I wonder if the tail lamp may have been fitted in that instance as "a matter of course" or whether it was pre-emptive of loss of the DBSO battery, do you recall if the tail lamp was working by any chance? It never occurred to me that the DVT would have batteries which could also be used solely for the tail lights under those circumstances. Cheers, Mark Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Edwin_m Posted December 10, 2012 Share Posted December 10, 2012 Many years ago I was waiting on Derby station and two or three class 47s coupled together were standing in platform 6. I noticed the flashing tail light was out and told the driver, who disappeared into the rear cab (no engine running on this loco) and turned on the built-in lights. I guess this would have been OK until it ran the battery flat! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Glorious NSE Posted December 11, 2012 Share Posted December 11, 2012 As per Al's post above - both these from drags between Birmingham and Nuneaton, 2005 No lamp when they DVT's at the back: Lamp when the loco's at the back: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
roythebus Posted December 12, 2012 Share Posted December 12, 2012 It depends whether the rear vehicle has battery power for the built in lamps. On the SW, we used to have a formation that was (variable) 4VEP/33/4TC. Sometimes it was 8VEP/4TC, in which case the TC would need a tail lamp as there was no ETH feed to run the lights, so a tail lamp was needed. There were reported intances of a 33+4TC arriving at New Street from Cardiff or Southampton; the New Street staff would moan about having to run round; the southern driver would change ends and prepare to drive away, having thrown away the oil tail lamp in disgust saying it wasn't needed as the red blinds on the TC were illuminated! This was before the days when push-pull working was common. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.