Jump to content
 

1. Dover Priory, Kent.


David Todd
 Share

Recommended Posts

I woke this morning,to a few emails,

One Wag,of which,commented on the video of the Dover Ranilway Rebuild.

"Wow! That’s one heck of a project. Are you going to hang fire and rebuild it like that?"

I am 5 years ahead of them, my b/ boards were built in a similar method, abliet much like the wooden trestle.

 

doveryardmodel024.jpg

 

_40731197_shakespearetunnel203-1.jpg

Edited by David Todd
  • Like 6
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hahah -first time I've been called a WAG - bring on the fake tan and toy dogs!

 

*edit* By the way, the track work looks brilliant and I'm not jealous in any way shape or form

Edited by freebs
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold

Hi Cliff, I hope this might help. if you print this out you could use an adjustable bevel or protactor for the angles, even two strips of thick card secured with a drawing pin would suffice. All the best Adrian

ps the angle from the bottom right of the portal is 65 degrees

post-17489-0-22243100-1459880066.jpg

post-17489-0-85280600-1459880077.jpg

Edited by westerhamstation
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

A protractor on one of your pictures from near 12 chain should give you the angle, as it is pretty much the same all along.  Google would give you where the erosion has bitten deeper.  

 

.....................    Failing that - a scope on top of a tripod and one of your grandchldren with a striped pole should suffice  ....   then all you have to do is a load of fore-shortening  ...    :drag:

 

J

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Cliff, I hope this might help. if you print this out you could use an adjustable bevel or protactor for the angles, even two strips of thick card secured with a drawing pin would suffice. All the best Adrian

ps the angle from the bottom right of the portal is 65 degrees

 

Thanks Adrian, I am not really concentrating at the moment. Botox.

Singing,last week, Tennis elbow, the week before.

 

We should really call you,the "Restoration Man", ah, but that;s been done on Tv.

One of dh's (RunsasRequired) student's,you know,                along with, The Hairy Biker's. :O

Edited by David Todd
Link to post
Share on other sites

A protractor on one of your pictures from near 12 chain should give you the angle, as it is pretty much the same all along.  Google would give you where the erosion has bitten deeper.  

 

.....................    Failing that - a scope on top of a tripod and one of your grandchldren with a striped pole should suffice  ....   then all you have to do is a load of fore-shortening  ...    :drag:

 

J

post-13585-0-07752500-1459927261.png

 

J. Managed to get hold of an ace scope,with fitted camera.

 

As you can see, I have been arrested.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What I need, is some wizard,

To take the 3D cliff profile, from the graphics of the vid. shewn earlier.

 

*snip*

 

With permission,

 

 

DT - I would advocate simplicity....

 

westerham in post #5406 has nailed the angle - and I'd imagine as the material is the same, that would also be the angle of the cliff that tops Shakey Tunnel, on the perpendicular face.

 

I know it might go against the grain, but for my 2p, I would imagine a less tall, but more correctly angled cliff face will, in the long run, give you more satisfaction than a full height one, that does not quite capture that distinctive angle...

 

Scott

Link to post
Share on other sites

As you know, the grandchildern are here.

 

After shewing them, how to do grass trees and bushes, yesterday afternoon,

 

They ask if they could use, "a bit of the Flock", to practice with, while I made them, their Dinner,

 

Here are the result's,  Hmm,

 

Tricked you, was their cry.

 

Poundland Sheep,are only  "representative" and not to scale.

 

26307185695_e0c5867b8c_k.jpgP1330985 by David Todd 2012, on Flickr

 

26240918521_2313af197e_k.jpgP1330986 by David Todd 2012, on Flickr

 

26034287510_98f7459d22_k.jpgP1330988 by David Todd 2012, on Flickr

 

:angel:   :no:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  • Like 5
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Thanks Westerham & Jukebox.

 

 



Hi Cliff, I hope this might help. if you print this out you could use an adjustable bevel or protactor for the angles, even two strips of thick card secured with a drawing pin would suffice. All the best Adrian

ps the angle from the bottom right of the portal is 65 degrees

 

 



DT - I would advocate simplicity....

 

westerham in post #5406 has nailed the angle - and I'd imagine as the material is the same, that would also be the angle of the cliff that tops Shakey Tunnel, on the perpendicular face.

 

I know it might go against the grain, but for my 2p, I would imagine a less tall, but more correctly angled cliff face will, in the long run, give you more satisfaction than a full height one, that does not quite capture that distinctive angle...

 

Scott

 

 

I have removed the other section's which made it all look odd.

This first section, I have left in, there just seem's to be a tad to shave off, mostly at the top of the section to give the correct fall. (if pushed).

 

26015494264_8c816af0a3_b.jpg

 by David Todd 2012, on Flickr

 

26594512776_700a8bfda0_b.jpg

 by David Todd 2012, on Flickr

 

26527845132_27cd93d69d_b.jpgP1360660 by David Todd 2012, on Flickr

 

26620576265_4d9969da3b_h.jpg

 by David Todd 2012, on Flickr

 

26347346420_6695e98437_k.jpgP1360652 by David Todd 2012, on Flickr

 

26620588345_0466189ca9_k.jpgP1360654 by David Todd 2012, on Flickr

Edited by David Todd
  • Like 8
Link to post
Share on other sites

Progress this evening,  the angle has now been shaved down, to 65 degrees, although the photos will not shew this.

The 3 pieces of celotex, are fixed together with wooden barbie skewer's.

I have also sealed the rear of the celotex,with a diluted solution of PVA,to stop the dust.

 

The front's will be eventually covered with a thin plaster and the join's covered with strip's of Modroc.

 

26577275941_7656666763_h.jpgP1360830 by David Todd 2012, on Flickr

 

26549497552_e75afbc191_k.jpgP1360831 by David Todd 2012, on Flickr

 

26039259183_6d15421b1b_k.jpgP1360833 by David Todd 2012, on Flickr

  • Like 8
Link to post
Share on other sites

He would have to hire a boat [the Tiger Moth is in for servicing this month.] to get face on pictures  ......  :locomotive:

 

........   or does the Sweat-shop have software to un-perspectivitize the pictures already taken?

 

J

Link to post
Share on other sites

........   or does the Sweat-shop have software to un-perspectivitize the pictures already taken?

Yup

A pic from each end then overlaid and manipulated on known base and height dims until something good enough for a bomb aimer/gunner to be guided by

(give or take a few joke sheep as collateral)

HTH

dh

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi David

Just having a catch up. The angle of the PIR looks pretty much spot on now for the angle of the cliffs. The height as well certainly gives the impression of the real location. Will certainly look impressive once the carving begins. Just standby for some serious mess. Even though I've cleaned my loft up twice since I've finished I still keep finding bits of the damn stuff in the oddest of locations! Although nowhere near as bad as polystyrene.

Cheers

Marcus

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh, my goodness, yes!    ....................

 

Hi David
Just having a catch up. The angle of the PIR looks pretty much spot on now for the angle of the cliffs. The height as well certainly gives the impression of the real location. Will certainly look impressive once the carving begins. Just standby for some serious mess. Even though I've cleaned my loft up twice since I've finished I still keep finding bits of the damn stuff in the oddest of locations! Although nowhere near as bad as polystyrene.
Cheers
Marcus

 

...............    so much better to shape the stuff standing up!  .....  :angel: :angel:

 

J

Link to post
Share on other sites

These photos are of a mock up, in it's raw state.

The celotex has not been sealed yet.

After sealing,a thin coat of plaster will be applied,as a base.

 

Because of the limited depth of my b/board,the actual depression section/staircase, is not achievable.

 

Previously,

 

the second (middle) section, is the staircase section.

there should be 2 sections after the tunnel mouths,but,have left one out,because the footbridge span,would be too long.

 

26203864773_15dc5e2598_z.jpg

Picture 1291 by David Todd 2012, on Flickr

 

 

Today,

 

26714551862_6ba2bf9a99_b.jpg

Picture 1292 by David Todd 2012, on Flickr

 

 

26524657390_2e9da56c6b_k.jpgP1380487 by David Todd 2012, on Flickr

 

26714551372_c71c30e1bf_b.jpg

Picture 1294 by David Todd 2012, on Flickr

 

 

26535791220_e8728450fd_k.jpgP1050849 by David Todd 2012, on Flickr

Edited by David Todd
  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...